Advertisement


Jorge E. Cortes, MD, on CML: Efficacy and Safety of Vodobatinib

2022 ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition

Advertisement

Jorge E. Cortes, MD, of Georgia Cancer Center at Augusta University, discusses new findings on vodobatinib, which was administered to patients with chronic-phase Philadelphia chromosome–positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and appeared to be efficacious and safe in people who had received therapy with two or three prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Vodobatinib remains a potential option for these highly refractory patients. A phase II study (NCT02629692) of vodobatinib is ongoing in CML patients whose disease has failed to respond to three or more TKIs, including ponatinib (Abstract 84).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
In this study, we looked at vodobatinib, a new tyrosine kinase inhibitor. It's an ATP competitive inhibitor of Bcr-Abl in patients that had refractory or relapsed chronic myeloid leukemia. This study is a phase one study where we had a dose escalation part and then a dose expansion part. We are combining both the dose escalation and the dose expansion cohort for this analysis, and the analysis is focused specifically on the efficacy and safety. According to the number of tyrosine kinase inhibitors that the patients had received previously. The design required that patients had received at least three prior TKIs or were unable to receive an additional TKI for whatever reason. We divided the cohorts into those that had received two or fewer tyrosine kinase inhibitors previously, or who had received three or more prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We also looked specifically at patients that had received prior ponatinib. Most of them were in the three TKI priors, and we even have a handful of patients, three, that had received prior asciminib. What we found on these analysis is that vodobatinib is very effective. We had a very high rate of major cytogenetic response, and it's very similar between the patients with the two or less TKIs previously and the three or more TKIs previously, approximately a 40% response rate in both arms. That includes the patients that had received prior ponatinib, but it was a little over 40% in those patients. Very importantly, major molecular response was seen in approximately 50% of patients, including a little over 50% of patients who had received the prior ponatinib. One of the patients that had received asciminib, who also had received ponatinib, also achieved a complete cytogenetic response. High levels of response, durable responses, and it reflects on a very good overall survival of more than 60% at three years. The safety profile was very favorable. Some diarrhea, but very little in terms of grade three toxicity, and very importantly, we really did not see any arterial occlusive events of significance. There were really a very low rate of items, and most of these were just like cold hands and very little. No concerns about the arterial occlusive events, perhaps because it's a very selective drug. It does not have VGF receptor inhibition, it doesn't have PDGF receptor inhibition, so it's a very selective, and it reflects in the safety. What we conclude from this analysis is that the drug is a very good agent that has good levels of efficacy in both patients that have received two or fewer tyrosine kinase inhibitors and three or more, including patients that had received prior ponatinib with a very good safety profile. That's important because there's an ongoing pivotal study for patients that have received three or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors, including ponatinib. It's enrolling, but it offers a good option for those patients who otherwise may not have too many other treatment alternatives.

Related Videos

Leukemia

Mark R. Litzow, MD, on ALL: Consolidation Therapy With Blinatumomab Improves Overall Survival

Mark R. Litzow, MD, of the Mayo Clinic, discusses phase III results from the ECOG-ACRIN E1910 Trial, which show that adding blinatumomab to consolidation chemotherapy resulted in a significantly better overall survival in adult patients aged 30 to 70 years with newly diagnosed B-lineage acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) who were measurable residual disease–negative after receiving intensification chemotherapy. The authors believe this may represent a new standard of care for this population (Abstract LBA-1).

Multiple Myeloma
Genomics/Genetics
Immunotherapy

Francesco Maura, MD, on Genomic Determinants of Resistance in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Treated With Targeted Immunotherapy

Francesco Maura, MD, of the University of Miami, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses his team’s findings in which they defined a comprehensive catalogue of genomic determinants of response to DKRd (carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. The researchers have identified a number of new genomic alterations that explain resistance to the agents currently used in combination regimens (Abstract 470).

 

Multiple Myeloma

Paul G. Richardson, MD, on Multiple Myeloma: Mezigdomide Plus Dexamethasone in Relapsed and Refractory Disease

Paul G. Richardson, MD, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses preliminary results from the dose-expansion phase of the CC-92480-MM-001 Trial, which showed promising efficacy in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, including those with prior BCMA-targeted therapies. Patients in these two groups had an overall response rate of 40% and 50%, respectively. The results support the development of mezigdomide, currently being evaluated in combination with standard therapies in multiple myeloma as part of a large, ongoing phase I/II trial (NCT03989414) and planned phase III studies (Abstract 568).

Hematologic Malignancies
Immunotherapy

Joseph Schroers-Martin, MD, on Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorders: Tumor Microenvironment Determinants of Immunotherapy Response

Joseph Schroers-Martin, MD, of Stanford University, discusses immunogenomic features reflecting divergent biology in posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD). These include evidence of mismatch repair defects in Epstein-Barr virus–positive PTLD, tumor microenvironment depletion, and MYC pathway enrichment in certain patients (Abstract 72).

Leukemia

Andrew Matthews, MD, on AML: Real-World Effectiveness of 7 + 3 Intensive Chemotherapy vs Venetoclax and a Hypomethylating Agent

Andrew Matthews, MD, of the Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, discusses findings from a large, multicenter study that showed superior outcomes with 7 + 3 chemotherapy (cytarabine continuously for 7 days, along with short infusions of an anthracycline on each of the first 3 days) vs venetoclax in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this real-world data set, the 7 + 3 cohort outperformed historical benchmarks in overall survival and early mortality, perhaps reflecting improved later lines of therapy and patient selection. Prospective studies (such as NCT04801797) must confirm the superiority of intensive chemotherapy (Abstract 426).

 

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement