Jorge E. Cortes, MD, on CML: Efficacy and Safety of Vodobatinib
2022 ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition
Jorge E. Cortes, MD, of Georgia Cancer Center at Augusta University, discusses new findings on vodobatinib, which was administered to patients with chronic-phase Philadelphia chromosome–positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and appeared to be efficacious and safe in people who had received therapy with two or three prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Vodobatinib remains a potential option for these highly refractory patients. A phase II study (NCT02629692) of vodobatinib is ongoing in CML patients whose disease has failed to respond to three or more TKIs, including ponatinib (Abstract 84).
Transcript
Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
In this study, we looked at vodobatinib, a new tyrosine kinase inhibitor. It's an ATP competitive inhibitor of Bcr-Abl in patients that had refractory or relapsed chronic myeloid leukemia. This study is a phase one study where we had a dose escalation part and then a dose expansion part. We are combining both the dose escalation and the dose expansion cohort for this analysis, and the analysis is focused specifically on the efficacy and safety. According to the number of tyrosine kinase inhibitors that the patients had received previously. The design required that patients had received at least three prior TKIs or were unable to receive an additional TKI for whatever reason. We divided the cohorts into those that had received two or fewer tyrosine kinase inhibitors previously, or who had received three or more prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We also looked specifically at patients that had received prior ponatinib. Most of them were in the three TKI priors, and we even have a handful of patients, three, that had received prior asciminib.
What we found on these analysis is that vodobatinib is very effective. We had a very high rate of major cytogenetic response, and it's very similar between the patients with the two or less TKIs previously and the three or more TKIs previously, approximately a 40% response rate in both arms. That includes the patients that had received prior ponatinib, but it was a little over 40% in those patients. Very importantly, major molecular response was seen in approximately 50% of patients, including a little over 50% of patients who had received the prior ponatinib. One of the patients that had received asciminib, who also had received ponatinib, also achieved a complete cytogenetic response. High levels of response, durable responses, and it reflects on a very good overall survival of more than 60% at three years.
The safety profile was very favorable. Some diarrhea, but very little in terms of grade three toxicity, and very importantly, we really did not see any arterial occlusive events of significance. There were really a very low rate of items, and most of these were just like cold hands and very little. No concerns about the arterial occlusive events, perhaps because it's a very selective drug. It does not have VGF receptor inhibition, it doesn't have PDGF receptor inhibition, so it's a very selective, and it reflects in the safety.
What we conclude from this analysis is that the drug is a very good agent that has good levels of efficacy in both patients that have received two or fewer tyrosine kinase inhibitors and three or more, including patients that had received prior ponatinib with a very good safety profile. That's important because there's an ongoing pivotal study for patients that have received three or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors, including ponatinib. It's enrolling, but it offers a good option for those patients who otherwise may not have too many other treatment alternatives.
The ASCO Post Staff
Eunice S. Wang, MD, of Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses the outcomes of patients newly diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who were treated with cytarabine plus daunorubicin plus gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO). These patients experienced higher rates of measurable residual disease–negative complete remission and complete remission with incomplete count recovery, compared to those treated with cytarabine plus idarubicin daunorubicin alone. Although adding GO was not associated with improved overall survival, longer follow-up is warranted to determine an absolute survival advantage of this regimen (Abstract 58).
The ASCO Post Staff
Abdul Rahman Al Armashi, MD, of Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western University, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, discusses a retrospective analysis, using a CDC database, in one of the largest subgroup-based racial population studies analyzing mortality trends in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Between 2000 and 2019, AML mortality was the highest in Whites and the lowest in American Indians or Alaska Natives. The highest rate of increase in mortality was seen in Asians or Pacific Islanders. Dr. Al Armashi talks about the many variables that might contribute to these inequalities (Abstract 600).
The ASCO Post Staff
Joseph Schroers-Martin, MD, of Stanford University, discusses immunogenomic features reflecting divergent biology in posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD). These include evidence of mismatch repair defects in Epstein-Barr virus–positive PTLD, tumor microenvironment depletion, and MYC pathway enrichment in certain patients (Abstract 72).
The ASCO Post Staff
Paul G. Richardson, MD, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses preliminary results from the dose-expansion phase of the CC-92480-MM-001 Trial, which showed promising efficacy in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, including those with prior BCMA-targeted therapies. Patients in these two groups had an overall response rate of 40% and 50%, respectively. The results support the development of mezigdomide, currently being evaluated in combination with standard therapies in multiple myeloma as part of a large, ongoing phase I/II trial (NCT03989414) and planned phase III studies (Abstract 568).
The ASCO Post Staff
Irene Roberts, MD, of Oxford’s Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, discusses children with Down syndrome, who have a more than 100-fold increased risk of developing acute myeloid leukemia before their fourth birthday compared to children without Down syndrome. Their risk of acute lymphoblastic leukemia is also increased by around 30-fold. Dr. Roberts details current knowledge about the biologic and molecular basis of this relationship between leukemia and Down syndrome, the role of trisomy 21 in leukemogenesis, and the clinical implications of these findings.