Advertisement


Mark R. Litzow, MD, on ALL: Consolidation Therapy With Blinatumomab Improves Overall Survival

2022 ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition

Advertisement

Mark R. Litzow, MD, of the Mayo Clinic, discusses phase III results from the ECOG-ACRIN E1910 Trial, which show that adding blinatumomab to consolidation chemotherapy resulted in a significantly better overall survival in adult patients aged 30 to 70 years with newly diagnosed B-lineage acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) who were measurable residual disease–negative after receiving intensification chemotherapy. The authors believe this may represent a new standard of care for this population (Abstract LBA-1).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Blinatumomab is a bispecific T-cell engager molecule that's been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for patients with relapsed and refractory B-lineage, acute lymphoblastic leukemia. And then more recently was approved for the treatment of patients who have measurable residual disease or MRD positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The aim of our study was to see if adding blinatumomab to chemotherapy had benefit for patients with MRD negative disease, who we overall think have a better prognosis. The design of the trial was to take patients between the ages of 30 and 70 with B-lineage ALL and newly diagnosed, and give them induction chemotherapy, standard chemotherapy, to get them into remission. Patients who achieved a conventional morphologic remission then had a cycle of intensification therapy to provide prophylaxis for their central nervous system. After that treatment, then they had a bone marrow biopsy and we assessed their MRD status by flow cytometry in a centralized lab. And patients that were MRD negative at that point were then randomized to either get four cycles of consolidation chemotherapy, followed by one to two years of maintenance chemotherapy or get randomized to receive that same four cycles of chemotherapy, but also have four cycles of blinatumomab intertwined with the cycles of chemotherapy. Patients who are randomized to blinatumomab plus chemotherapy, received two monthly cycles of blinatumomab, recall that that's given by continuous infusion for four weeks. They then got several more cycles of the consolidation chemotherapy, then got another cycle of blinatumomab, then the fourth cycle of consolidation chemotherapy, and then another cycle of blinatumomab, and then went on to maintenance therapy. And the goal of the study was to see if we could improve their overall survival. We enrolled 488 patients in the trial. 81% of those patients achieved a conventional morphologic complete remission. Some of them unfortunately relapsed shortly after that or had to be taken off study because of toxicity. But at the randomization for the MRD negative patients, we were able to randomize 224 patients, so 112 patients to each of the two arms, the chemotherapy alone or the chemotherapy plus blinatumomab. And what we found was that the survival was much improved with blinatumomab and chemotherapy arm. And this was based on less relapses in that arm. Even though these patients are MRD negative, we know that they can still relapse and could still have residual disease. At three and a half years of follow up, the survival in blinatumomab plus chemotherapy arm was 83% versus 65% in the patients who got chemotherapy, and this was from the time of randomization. We also showed a benefit for relapse-free survival as well. We're very excited about these results. We think they represent a new standard of care and that blinatumomab should be considered to be added to consolidation chemotherapy for patients for standard of care. We are discussing now how to build on these studies. We think that adding blinatumomab earlier in the treatment course may be beneficial, and there are studies that are beginning to look at that. We're also incorporating this into the other new modalities of therapy that you all are aware of, that are involved in the treatment of B-lineage ALL.

Related Videos

Leukemia
Issues in Oncology

Abdul Rahman Al Armashi, MD, on AML: Racial Disparities in Mortality Trends

Abdul Rahman Al Armashi, MD, of Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western University, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, discusses a retrospective analysis, using a CDC database, in one of the largest subgroup-based racial population studies analyzing mortality trends in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Between 2000 and 2019, AML mortality was the highest in Whites and the lowest in American Indians or Alaska Natives. The highest rate of increase in mortality was seen in Asians or Pacific Islanders. Dr. Al Armashi talks about the many variables that might contribute to these inequalities (Abstract 600).

Leukemia

Andrew Matthews, MD, on AML: Real-World Effectiveness of 7 + 3 Intensive Chemotherapy vs Venetoclax and a Hypomethylating Agent

Andrew Matthews, MD, of the Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, discusses findings from a large, multicenter study that showed superior outcomes with 7 + 3 chemotherapy (cytarabine continuously for 7 days, along with short infusions of an anthracycline on each of the first 3 days) vs venetoclax in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this real-world data set, the 7 + 3 cohort outperformed historical benchmarks in overall survival and early mortality, perhaps reflecting improved later lines of therapy and patient selection. Prospective studies (such as NCT04801797) must confirm the superiority of intensive chemotherapy (Abstract 426).

 

Lymphoma

Paolo F. Caimi, MD, on DLBCL: Outcomes After R-ICE Chemoimmunotherapy

Paolo F. Caimi, MD, of the Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, discusses new findings showing that patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who achieve a complete response after salvage therapy with rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (R-ICE) can achieve long-term disease control, regardless of the time to relapse from initial therapy, particularly if they proceed to autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). These results suggest that second-line chemotherapy followed by ASCT and/or CAR T-cell therapy for chemosensitive and chemorefractory patients may maximize patient outcomes, regardless of time to relapse (Abstract 156).

Multiple Myeloma

Paul G. Richardson, MD, on Multiple Myeloma: Mezigdomide Plus Dexamethasone in Relapsed and Refractory Disease

Paul G. Richardson, MD, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses preliminary results from the dose-expansion phase of the CC-92480-MM-001 Trial, which showed promising efficacy in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, including those with prior BCMA-targeted therapies. Patients in these two groups had an overall response rate of 40% and 50%, respectively. The results support the development of mezigdomide, currently being evaluated in combination with standard therapies in multiple myeloma as part of a large, ongoing phase I/II trial (NCT03989414) and planned phase III studies (Abstract 568).

Multiple Myeloma

Julie Côté, MD, on Multiple Myeloma: Real-World Results of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Newly Diagnosed Patients

Julie Côté, MD, of CHU de Québec–Université Laval, discusses findings from the Canadian Myeloma Research Group database, which showed that integrating bortezomib and lenalidomide into the autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) sequence produces a median overall survival rate ≥ 10 years in most patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. These observations highlight the contribution of post-ASCT maintenance, particularly lenalidomide given until disease progression, when used in multiple patient groups including those with and without high risk, as well as those requiring a second induction regimen (Abstract 117).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement