Advertisement


Xin Gao, MD, on Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: LY4101174

ASCO 2026

Advertisement

Xin Gao, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, discusses initial results from the phase I EXCEED trial of LY4101174, a Nectin-4–targeting antibody-drug conjugate, for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (Abstract 4517).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
This is a clinical trial that was performed as a dose-escalation study in patients with advanced metastatic urothelial carcinoma as well as other solid tumors known to express Nectin-4. The background for this study is that we know that enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab have really revolutionized the treatment for patients with advanced and metastatic urothelial cancers. But unfortunately, treatment resistance and treatment intolerability become an issue. Patients do need additional treatments beyond EV plus pembrolizumab, and unfortunately, at this time, the standard of care remains unclear and prognosis remains poor for patients who need another therapy beyond EV and pembrolizumab. We conducted this phase 1 clinical trial with a dose-escalation design. Eighty-six patients in total had metastatic urothelial cancers, and we looked at various dose levels, starting with low doses, Q2-week dosing as well as Q3-week dosing, which was explored after patients developed DLTs at the third dose level of Q2-week dosing. The vast majority of patients were heavily pretreated patients. Median lines of prior therapy was 3; 88% of patients had received prior platinum-based chemotherapy, 92% had received prior enfortumab vedotin, and all patients had received prior immune checkpoint inhibitors. So I think this was a study that really captured, you know, what's going on in the real world when patients need to think about another therapy beyond EV plus pembrolizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy. What we saw was that there was antitumor activity, particularly at the highest dose level of 4 mg/kg Q3-week dosing. We saw an objective response rate of 36% with the dose, with a disease control rate of 76%. However, we also ran into dose-limiting and significant hematologic toxicities, including grade 3 or higher anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, as well as febrile neutropenia at the highest dose level despite use of G-CSF prophylaxis. So the EXCEED study was a proof of concept that further targeting of Nectin-4 remains a viable and important clinical strategy for patients with treatment-refractory metastatic urothelial cancers after enfortumab vedotin. I think future work will be needed to continue to develop and study newer, other kinds of Nectin-4-targeting drugs with different payloads, different linkers, that hopefully will be able to find a dose that's both efficacious and tolerable for patients.

Related Videos

Prostate Cancer

Adam Kibel, MD, on PROTEUS Trial in High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Surgical Oncologist’s Perspective

Adam Kibel, MD, of Brigham and Women's Hospital, discusses findings from the phase III PROTEUS trial, which evaluated perioperative (neoadjuvant and adjuvant) apalutamide and androgen deprivation therapy vs placebo and ADT with radical prostatectomy in patients with high-risk localized or locally advanced prostate cancer. Dr. Kibel talks about how the regimen of apalutamide and ADT affects both the surgical procedure itself as well as patient outcomes postprocedure (Abstract LBA1).

Breast Cancer

Sara A. Hurvitz, MD, FACP, on Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: More Results From ASCENT-03

Sara A. Hurvitz, MD, FACP, of Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, provides an update focusing on progression-free survival after next line of treatment and subsequent therapies among patients enrolled in the ASCENT-03 trial. The study compared sacituzumab govitecan vs chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (Abstract 1001).

Breast Cancer

Erika P. Hamilton, MD, FASCO, on HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Maintenance Therapy Comparison

Erika P. Hamilton, MD, FASCO, of Sarah Cannon Research Institute, talks about a comparison of the efficacy and safety of tucatinib vs placebo combined with trastuzumab and pertuzumab as maintenance therapy for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer by stratified subgroups (Abstract 1005).

Leukemia

Daniel A. Ermann, MD, on Two Agents in Treatment-Naive Patients With CLL: Real-World Treatment and Survival Outcomes

Daniel A. Ermann, MD, of Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, reviews data from a retrospective analysis that compared the real-world effectiveness of monotherapy first-line treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) based on overall survival and time to next treatment (Abstract 7045). 

Lung Cancer

Jonathan W. Goldman, MD, on RET Fusion–Positive NSCLC: Adjuvant Selpercatinib

Jonathan W. Goldman, MD, of the University of California, Los Angeles, presents event-free survival data from the primary analysis of the phase III LIBRETTO-432 trial, which investigated the efficacy of the kinase inhibitor selpercatinib in patients with stage IB–IIIA RET fusion–positive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (Abstract LBA3).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement