Advertisement


Shilpa Gupta, MD, on Locally Advanced/Metastatic Urothelial Cancer: Phase III MAIN-CAV Trial

ASCO 2026

Advertisement

Shilpa Gupta, MD, of Taussig Cancer Institute, discusses findings from the phase III MAIN-CAV study (Alliance A032001) of maintenance cabozantinib and avelumab vs avelumab after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial cancer (Abstract 4514).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
In locally advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer, platinum based chemotherapy has been the standard of care for decades until recently when EV pembro showed that it was better than platinum in the frontline setting. Back in 2020, maintenance avelumab was approved for patients who did not progress on frontline platinum based chemotherapy and it improved survival compared to best supportive care. We wanted to build upon the avelumab backbone to see if we can help patients who don't have durable response and we designed this cooperative group trial to build on avelumab backbone with a VEGF TKI, cabozantinib or the MAIN-CAV trial was built on that. It was a very timely study at the time. We designed it to enroll 654 patients and randomized them to maintenance avelumab versus maintenance avelumab and cabozantinib, limiting the total duration of two years for each arm. Primary endpoint was overall survival and we hypothesized that we could build upon the median 21 month overall survival with the avelumab to 28 months with combination. And while the planned enrollment was for 654 patients, unfortunately we could not accrue the patient because of the new standard with EV and pembro. So we closed the trial after 68 patients were enrolled because EV pembro was approved in the US and we analyzed the patients enrolled and we found that you know 33 and 35 patients were enrolled in avelumab versus avelumab cabozantinib arm. Unfortunately we did not see differences in the progression-free survival or overall survival. But this is an underpowered study which was closed prematurely. So it's difficult to make that determination. But in the limited numbers we have, we did not see a difference and we did not see that cabozantinib even added to the response rate seen when avelumab. As far as toxicities were concerned, there were no new safety signals and there was more toxicity in the combination arm as expected with an IO and TKI. So at this time, we are working on the translational work for this study to guide future development around VEGF.

Related Videos

Breast Cancer

Martine J. Piccart-Gebhart, MD, PhD, on Personalizing Treatments in HR-Positive/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer

Martine J. Piccart-Gebhart, MD, PhD, of Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles, reviews multiple abstracts discussing avenues of personalized treatment for patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, including genomic testing and systemic therapy.

Gynecologic Cancers

Noelle Cloven, MD, on RAINFOL-03: Actively Recruiting Trial in Pretreated Endometrial Cancer

Noelle Cloven, MD, of Texas Oncology, discusses the actively recruiting RAINFOL-03 (ENGOT-EN-31/GOG-3128) study, a global, phase III, open-label, randomized study of rinatabart sesutecan vs investigator’s choice of chemotherapy in patients with endometrial cancer after receipt of platinum-based chemotherapy and PD-L1 inhibition (Abstract TPS5646).

Bladder Cancer

Xin Gao, MD, on Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: LY4101174

Xin Gao, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, discusses initial results from the phase I EXCEED trial of LY4101174, a Nectin-4–targeting antibody-drug conjugate, for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (Abstract 4517).

Leukemia

Daniel A. Ermann, MD, on Two Agents in Treatment-Naive Patients With CLL: Real-World Treatment and Survival Outcomes

Daniel A. Ermann, MD, of Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, reviews data from a retrospective analysis that compared the real-world effectiveness of monotherapy first-line treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) based on overall survival and time to next treatment (Abstract 7045). 

Breast Cancer

Kevin Kalinsky, MD, MS, FASCO, on Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: More Results From ASCENT-04

Kevin Kalinsky, MD, MS, FASCO, of Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, provides an update focusing on progression-free survival after next line of treatment and subsequent therapies among patients enrolled in the ASCENT-04 trial. The study compared sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab in patients with previously untreated PD-L1–positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (Abstract LBA1000).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement