Advertisement


Shilpa Gupta, MD, on Locally Advanced/Metastatic Urothelial Cancer: Phase III MAIN-CAV Trial

ASCO 2026

Advertisement

Shilpa Gupta, MD, of Taussig Cancer Institute, discusses findings from the phase III MAIN-CAV study (Alliance A032001) of maintenance cabozantinib and avelumab vs avelumab after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial cancer (Abstract 4514).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
In locally advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer, platinum based chemotherapy has been the standard of care for decades until recently when EV pembro showed that it was better than platinum in the frontline setting. Back in 2020, maintenance avelumab was approved for patients who did not progress on frontline platinum based chemotherapy and it improved survival compared to best supportive care. We wanted to build upon the avelumab backbone to see if we can help patients who don't have durable response and we designed this cooperative group trial to build on avelumab backbone with a VEGF TKI, cabozantinib or the MAIN-CAV trial was built on that. It was a very timely study at the time. We designed it to enroll 654 patients and randomized them to maintenance avelumab versus maintenance avelumab and cabozantinib, limiting the total duration of two years for each arm. Primary endpoint was overall survival and we hypothesized that we could build upon the median 21 month overall survival with the avelumab to 28 months with combination. And while the planned enrollment was for 654 patients, unfortunately we could not accrue the patient because of the new standard with EV and pembro. So we closed the trial after 68 patients were enrolled because EV pembro was approved in the US and we analyzed the patients enrolled and we found that you know 33 and 35 patients were enrolled in avelumab versus avelumab cabozantinib arm. Unfortunately we did not see differences in the progression-free survival or overall survival. But this is an underpowered study which was closed prematurely. So it's difficult to make that determination. But in the limited numbers we have, we did not see a difference and we did not see that cabozantinib even added to the response rate seen when avelumab. As far as toxicities were concerned, there were no new safety signals and there was more toxicity in the combination arm as expected with an IO and TKI. So at this time, we are working on the translational work for this study to guide future development around VEGF.

Related Videos

Skin Cancer

Hannah L. Kenny, MD, and Joseph M. Curry, MD, on BCC of the Head and Neck: Neoadjuvant Cemiplimab

Hannah L. Kenny, MD, and Joseph M. Curry, MD, both of Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, discuss results of a phase II trial of neoadjuvant cemiplimab-rwlc in patients with hedgehog inhibitor–naive basal cell carcinoma (BCC) of the head and neck (Abstract 9515). 

Bladder Cancer

Ronald C. Chen, MD, MPH, FASCO, on High-Risk Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma: HRQoL With Pembrolizumab vs Observation

Ronald C. Chen, MD, MPH, FASCO, of the University of Kansas Medical Center, presents health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data from the AMBASSADOR trial, which showed that in patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma after radical surgery, adjuvant pembrolizumab for 1 year approximately doubled disease-free survival, causes fatigue and dyspnea which modestly impacted physical function and ability to perform certain roles (such as work and hobbies), without impact on overall quality of life (Abstract 4513).

Gynecologic Cancers

Ramez N. Eskander, MD, on Endometrial Cancer: Pembrolizumab Plus Carboplatin/Paclitaxel

Ramez N. Eskander, MD, of UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, presents an updated overall survival analysis and examination of subsequent therapy in patients with endometrial cancer treated with pembrolizumab plus carboplatin/paclitaxel as compared to carboplatin/paclitaxel plus placebo in the NRG-GY018 trial (Abstract 5502). 

Breast Cancer

Walter Weber, MD, on Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Techniques After Mastectomy

Walter Weber, MD, of University Hospital Basel, presents data from the international randomized phase III PREPEC trial (OPBC-02), which found prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) significantly and relevantly improved long-term quality of life—at the cost of a higher risk of loss or replacement of expander or implantcompared to subpectoral IBBR (Abstract 504). 

Lung Cancer

Laura Alder, MD, on New Data on Combination Therapy, Immunotherapy, and ADCs in Small Cell Lung Cancer

Laura Alder, MD, of Duke University Medical Center, highlights emerging data discussed in the meeting’s oral abstract session on small cell lung cancer, including increased toxicity without efficacy benefit from concurrent chemoradiation and immunotherapy, the intracranial activity of tarlatamab-dlle, and early data for a SEZ6-targeting antibody-drug conjugate. 

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement