Advertisement


Julie R. Brahmer, MD, FASCO, on Previously Untreated Advanced Squamous NSCLC: HARMONi-6 Trial

ASCO 2026

Advertisement

Julie R. Brahmer, MD, FASCO, of the Bloomberg–Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, provides expert commentary on the overall survival results from the phase III HARMONi-6 trial presented in this year’s Plenary Session. The study compared ivonescimab plus chemotherapy vs tislelizumab plus chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with advanced squamous non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (Abstract LBA4).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
This trial was a first-line advanced non–small cell lung cancer trial that randomized patients with squamous non–small cell lung cancer to either ivonescimab plus paclitaxel plus carboplatin or tislelizumab, which is a PD-1 antibody, and chemotherapy. And then the primary overall survival, which was previously presented, was progression-free survival. And today, we heard the interim overall survival analysis that was made possible because the prior progression-free survival was positive. Now, this study is a study of ivonescimab, which is a VEGF/PD-1 bispecific antibody. So it has both a VEGF antibody toward VEGF combined with a PD-1 antibody. And this combination is felt to have an advantage because it pulls the antibody into the tumor microenvironment and it increases the affinity of that antibody to PD-1. And the hope is that it increases antitumor immunity but potentially cuts down on VEGF systemic toxicity. But that's unclear right now. But today, Dr. Liu and colleagues presented the overall survival advantage. Now, this study didn't make an interim cut, so this is an early look, but it was preplanned. And because it showed an improved survival in these patients, it's important for us to know these data. And so the hazard ratio was 0.66. So that is nearly a 40% reduction in death for those patients who received ivonescimab plus chemotherapy. And then also the median overall survival was approximately 28 months in the experimental arm, but in the control arm, it was about 24 months. Now, the median follow-up was about 21 months. And with that, it does give us a little bit of pause because there was a lot of censoring and the hazard ratio and the median survival numbers may change over time when we see the final analysis. But it's exciting to see. And the curves, the survival curves, continued to widen over time. So we hope that this is a true reflection of the power of a bispecific antibody that blocks both VEGF and PD-1. Now, it does come along with side effects. The VEGF antibodies are known to have side effects, and these are VEGF-related, typically proteinuria, that means protein spilling into your urine from the kidneys, as well as a risk of bleeding, a risk of hypertension, and then a very rare risk of clotting. And we did see overall increased treatment-related adverse events as well as serious adverse events that were treatment-related compared with the standard arm. But in general, the treatment-related deaths, though, were exactly the same. So, you know, ivonescimab did not increase the risk of death due to side effects. Now, when we look at the VEGF antibody and those side effects in general, the high-grade, or grade 3 and higher, side effects were relatively uncommon except for proteinuria that occurred in about 6% to 8% in grade 3 or higher. But you also have to pay attention to the grade 2 side effects, and the grade 2 side effects were present, and grade 2 side effects, even when they are anti-VEGF-related, then you do have to treat those. So it was important to understand that overall, in my take, you know, these are significant findings, but they are for a Chinese patient population. This study was only performed in China, and the Chinese patient population typically does better with all treatments that have been tested recently in general compared with a global patient population. So we have to take that in context. So my key takeaways were that this combination, ivonescimab plus chemotherapy, will be practice-changing for a squamous lung cancer patient population in China. Based on the interim survival results, we see adverse events that were mainly VEGF-related, and they were higher in the ivonescimab arm, and there is some uncertainty about how best to pick those patients for treatment and how those patients were enrolled. And then lastly, you know, how applicable will this be to our global lung cancer patient population? We need to await the global studies to resolve that.

Related Videos

Skin Cancer

Danny Rischin, MD, on Adjuvant Cemiplimab for High-Risk CSCC

Danny Rischin, MD, of Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, talks about data from the disease-free survival analyses of the C-POST study, which were conducted per high-risk criteria and start time after radiotherapy. C-POST evaluated adjuvant cemiplimab-rwlc for patients with high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) (Abstract 6083).

Lymphoma

Dai Chihara, MD, on a Regimen for Older, Unfit, or Frail Patients With Newly Diagnosed DLBCL

Dai Chihara, MD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, reviews results from an open-label, single-arm, phase II trial that investigated the combination of epcoritamab with R-miniCVP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone) in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) classified as unfit or frail per geriatric assessment or not eligible for anthracycline chemotherapy due to reduced ejection function or prior exposure (Abstract 7002). 

Lymphoma
Leukemia

Supriya Gupta, MD, on Investigational CAR T-Cell Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory NHL and CLL

Supriya Gupta, MD, of the University of Minnesota, presents data on azercabtagene zapreleucel, an investigational anti-CD19 allogeneic chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, in combination with low-dose interleukin-2 in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (Abstract 7012). 

Breast Cancer

Peter Schmid, MD, PhD, FRCP, on ER-Positive HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer: Giredestrant by Menopausal Status

Peter Schmid, MD, PhD, FRCP, of Queen Mary University of London, shares more data from the phase III lidERA BC clinical trial. This analysis focused on the efficacy and safety of giredestrant in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer, looking at both premenopausal and postmenopausal populations (Abstract 502).

Breast Cancer

Elizabeth McDonald, MD, PhD, on GLP-1 Agonists and Breast Cancer Incidence

Elizabeth McDonald, MD, PhD, of the University of Pennsylvania, discusses results from a retrospective cohort study that showed that the use of GLP-1 treatment was associated with a significantly lower incidence of breast cancer, after accounting for age, race, ethnicity, BMI, breast density, and type 2 diabetes status (Abstract 10506).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement