Advertisement


Jason R. Westin, MD, FASCO, on Updated Safety and Efficacy From the SUNMO Trial in LBCL

ASCO 2026

Advertisement

Jason R. Westin, MD, FASCO, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, provides an update on the safety and efficacy data from the phase III SUNMO trial, which compared mosunetuzumab and polatuzumab vedotin vs rituximab, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) (Abstract 7007).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
SUNMO is a study comparing a new combination called mosunetuzumab and polatuzumab, or Mosun-Pola. Mosun-Pola is a combination of a bispecific antibody and an antibody-drug conjugate. That combination has looked very promising in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma, and the SUNMO trial evaluated it in a randomized fashion against R-GemOx, a chemotherapy backbone that's used commonly around the world for patients with relapsed large cell lymphoma. We presented last year the initial results and published them in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, the initial primary analysis. But at this ASCO meeting, we're now presenting an important update to those results. What we've shown with longer follow-up is that Mosun-Pola is still superior to R-GemOx, and we're hopeful this will translate into approvals for Mosun-Pola so that this treatment can be available to patients both within the United States as well as globally if they have relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma. Specifically, what we found in this trial was that in patients who have relapsed large cell lymphoma and are transplant ineligible, the combination of Mosun-Pola had an improvement in overall response rate, complete response rate, progression-free survival, and quality of life for the patients. Patients actually felt better and did better receiving this novel treatment versus chemotherapy. Mosun-Pola is given as an outpatient. The mosunetuzumab part can be given subcutaneously, the polatuzumab part is given intravenously, and it's a fixed-duration treatment. It's not something that has to go on for a long time. It's given for a prescribed number of cycles, and then that stops. And what we found is that it doubled the complete response rate and had a massive improvement in progression-free survival. The interim analysis of overall survival is presented as well, and those data need to mature a bit more to see if there's a true difference in overall survival. But thus far, the results show a very significant improvement in patient outcomes for Mosun-Pola. An important point about the SUNMO trial, as we look at the toxicity profile for Mosun-Pola, is that bispecific antibodies and CAR T-cell therapies have a toxicity called cytokine release syndrome, which can be quite difficult to manage in sites that don't have experience managing this. What we saw for Mosun-Pola was that more than 95% of patients did not have significant cytokine release syndrome, which is a major difference from other bispecific antibodies in the same space. So if community oncologists are looking to choose whether they should use treatment A or treatment B for their patient, the lack of significant toxicities for Mosun-Pola could be a significant advantage for using this regimen over other regimens. That very low rate of cytokine release syndrome will be favorable for patients. So the message that oncologists should take away from this video is that if they're looking for treatments for patients who are ineligible for standard-of-care stem cell transplant with relapsed large cell lymphoma, the bispecific antibody mosunetuzumab and the antibody-drug conjugate polatuzumab, Mosun-Pola, should be an option they should consider for their patients, especially when comparing it to chemotherapy like R-GemOx.

Related Videos

Bladder Cancer

Ronald C. Chen, MD, MPH, FASCO, on High-Risk Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma: HRQoL With Pembrolizumab vs Observation

Ronald C. Chen, MD, MPH, FASCO, of the University of Kansas Medical Center, presents health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data from the AMBASSADOR trial, which showed that in patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma after radical surgery, adjuvant pembrolizumab for 1 year approximately doubled disease-free survival, causes fatigue and dyspnea which modestly impacted physical function and ability to perform certain roles (such as work and hobbies), without impact on overall quality of life (Abstract 4513).

Breast Cancer

Kevin Kalinsky, MD, MS, FASCO, on Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: More Results From ASCENT-04

Kevin Kalinsky, MD, MS, FASCO, of Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, provides an update focusing on progression-free survival after next line of treatment and subsequent therapies among patients enrolled in the ASCENT-04 trial. The study compared sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab in patients with previously untreated PD-L1–positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (Abstract LBA1000).

Lung Cancer

Jonathan W. Goldman, MD, on RET Fusion–Positive NSCLC: Adjuvant Selpercatinib

Jonathan W. Goldman, MD, of the University of California, Los Angeles, presents event-free survival data from the primary analysis of the phase III LIBRETTO-432 trial, which investigated the efficacy of the kinase inhibitor selpercatinib in patients with stage IB–IIIA RET fusion–positive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (Abstract LBA3).

Lillian L. Siu, MD, on Liquid KRAS Mutation Screening in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Lillian L. Siu, MD, of Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, discusses the clinical utility of liquid biopsy testing for common KRAS variants to facilitate matching patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to appropriate early-phase trials (Abstract 3049).

Leukemia

Daniel A. Ermann, MD, on Two Agents in Treatment-Naive Patients With CLL: Real-World Treatment and Survival Outcomes

Daniel A. Ermann, MD, of Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, reviews data from a retrospective analysis that compared the real-world effectiveness of monotherapy first-line treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) based on overall survival and time to next treatment (Abstract 7045). 

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement