Advertisement


Jason R. Westin, MD, FASCO, on Updated Safety and Efficacy From the SUNMO Trial in LBCL

ASCO 2026

Advertisement

Jason R. Westin, MD, FASCO, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, provides an update on the safety and efficacy data from the phase III SUNMO trial, which compared mosunetuzumab and polatuzumab vedotin vs rituximab, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) (Abstract 7007).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
SUNMO is a study comparing a new combination called mosunetuzumab and polatuzumab, or Mosun-Pola. Mosun-Pola is a combination of a bispecific antibody and an antibody-drug conjugate. That combination has looked very promising in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma, and the SUNMO trial evaluated it in a randomized fashion against R-GemOx, a chemotherapy backbone that's used commonly around the world for patients with relapsed large cell lymphoma. We presented last year the initial results and published them in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, the initial primary analysis. But at this ASCO meeting, we're now presenting an important update to those results. What we've shown with longer follow-up is that Mosun-Pola is still superior to R-GemOx, and we're hopeful this will translate into approvals for Mosun-Pola so that this treatment can be available to patients both within the United States as well as globally if they have relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma. Specifically, what we found in this trial was that in patients who have relapsed large cell lymphoma and are transplant ineligible, the combination of Mosun-Pola had an improvement in overall response rate, complete response rate, progression-free survival, and quality of life for the patients. Patients actually felt better and did better receiving this novel treatment versus chemotherapy. Mosun-Pola is given as an outpatient. The mosunetuzumab part can be given subcutaneously, the polatuzumab part is given intravenously, and it's a fixed-duration treatment. It's not something that has to go on for a long time. It's given for a prescribed number of cycles, and then that stops. And what we found is that it doubled the complete response rate and had a massive improvement in progression-free survival. The interim analysis of overall survival is presented as well, and those data need to mature a bit more to see if there's a true difference in overall survival. But thus far, the results show a very significant improvement in patient outcomes for Mosun-Pola. An important point about the SUNMO trial, as we look at the toxicity profile for Mosun-Pola, is that bispecific antibodies and CAR T-cell therapies have a toxicity called cytokine release syndrome, which can be quite difficult to manage in sites that don't have experience managing this. What we saw for Mosun-Pola was that more than 95% of patients did not have significant cytokine release syndrome, which is a major difference from other bispecific antibodies in the same space. So if community oncologists are looking to choose whether they should use treatment A or treatment B for their patient, the lack of significant toxicities for Mosun-Pola could be a significant advantage for using this regimen over other regimens. That very low rate of cytokine release syndrome will be favorable for patients. So the message that oncologists should take away from this video is that if they're looking for treatments for patients who are ineligible for standard-of-care stem cell transplant with relapsed large cell lymphoma, the bispecific antibody mosunetuzumab and the antibody-drug conjugate polatuzumab, Mosun-Pola, should be an option they should consider for their patients, especially when comparing it to chemotherapy like R-GemOx.

Related Videos

Bladder Cancer

Xin Gao, MD, on Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: LY4101174

Xin Gao, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, discusses initial results from the phase I EXCEED trial of LY4101174, a Nectin-4–targeting antibody-drug conjugate, for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (Abstract 4517).

Leukemia

Mazyar Shadman, MD, on CLL/SLL: Sonorotoclax and Zanubrutinib

Mazyar Shadman, MD, of the University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, describes the safety and efficacy results of the all-oral first-line combination regimen of sonrotoclax and zanubrutinib for patients with treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), as well as the doublet’s effect on measurable residual disease (Abstract 7043). He also discusses the phase III BGB-11417-304/CELESTIAL-TNCLL-2 trial; this ongoing study is evaluating sonrotoclax plus zanubrutinib vs venetoclax and acalabrutinib in treatment-naive patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (Abstract TPS7099).

Leukemia

Angimar Uriepero-Palma, MD, on CLL: Impact of SGLT2 Inhibitors on Patients With Diabetes

Angimar Uriepero-Palma, MD, of Jefferson Einstein Philadelphia Hospital, discusses a study that showed use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors was associated with longer 3-year overall survival and a lower risk of cytopenias and infections among diabetic patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) receiving Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Abstract 7051).

Breast Cancer

Yashasvini Sampathkumar, MD, on Job Retention Intervention for Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Therapy: Digital vs Print Format

Yashasvini Sampathkumar, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, presents data on Talking to Employers and Medical Staff about Work (TEAMWork), an English/Spanish intervention. The English/Spanish intervention, delivered as a booklet or mobile app, was developed to improve work outcomes among women undergoing breast cancer therapy. Dr. Sampathkumar discusses whether the digital vs print format was preferable among this population (Abstract 11060). 

Breast Cancer
Genomics/Genetics

Paolo Tarantino, MD, PhD, on HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Overall Survival by Genomic Profile

Paolo Tarantino, MD, PhD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, reviews the results of a large clinicogenomic database study that looked at overall survival by genomic profile among patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Patients with mutations in key DNA repair genes experienced a numerically worse prognosis, representing an unmet need for drug development, say researchers (Abstract 1045). 

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement