Frank A. Sinicrope, MD, on Adjuvant Treatment Strategies for Stage III dMMR Colon Cancer
2025 ASCO Annual Meeting
Frank A. Sinicrope, MD, of Mayo Clinic Rochester, reviews findings from the randomized Alliance A021502/ATOMIC trial, which studied standard chemotherapy alone or combined with atezolizumab as adjuvant therapy for patients with stage III DNA mismatch repair–deficient (dMMR) colon cancer (LBA1).
Transcript
Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
ATOMIC was for patients with deficient mismatch repair stage 3 colon cancer. All of these patients had undergone a surgical resection with curative intent and all were found to have deficient mismatch repair tumors by immunohistochemistry. Patients were randomized 1 to 1 to FOLFOX chemotherapy plus atezolizumab given for six months, with the atezolizumab continued for an additional six months. This was compared to FOLFOX alone for six months. Atezolizumab, as we know, is an anti–PD-L1 antibody. The objective of this study was to see whether or not the immunotherapy would improve outcomes compared to chemotherapy alone. At the second interim analysis of this trial, with 75% of events, the trial was stopped. The results were reported out at a median follow-up of 37.2 months. The chemoimmunotherapy was associated with a hazard ratio of 0.5, indicating that there was a reduction in recurrence or death by 50% compared to the FOLFOX arm. So these are impressive results we regard as practice-changing, and I would comment that the treatments were well tolerated and not associated with really any adverse events that would not be expected with each of the agents. So we regard this treatment as a new standard of care for this patient population, and it really demonstrates that taking immunotherapy that we're commonly using in this population in the metastatic setting now can be moved to earlier-stage or stage 3 disease to benefit these patients also. So we think this is a very clinically meaningful result for patients, and we're very excited to continue to see if the guidelines will now be adopting this new regimen for our patients.
The ASCO Post Staff
Elena Elez, MD, PhD, of Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, presents updated overall survival data as well as progression-free survival data from the BREAKWATER trial of the first-line use of encorafenib, cetuximab, and mFOLFOX6 in BRAF V600E–mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (LBA3500).
The ASCO Post Staff
Hope S. Rugo, MD, FASCO, of City of Hope, and Rebecca Alexandra Dent, MD, FASCO, of National Cancer Centre Singapore, review the results of a biomarker analysis of the DESTINY-Breast06 trial, which evaluated trastuzumab deruxtecan after endocrine therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer (Abstract 1013). They also discuss findings from the SERENA-6 and EMBER-3 trials, also presented at ASCO 2025, and what all this new data means for the sequencing of endocrine therapy in patients with breast cancer.
The ASCO Post Staff
Neil M. Iyengar, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, reviews several studies that aimed to answer two questions: does menopausal hormone therapy (HRT) impact overall survival and breast cancer–specific mortality in younger women diagnosed with high-risk disease (Abstract 10506); and do GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), a class of weight-loss medications, have cancer risk reduction properties (Abstracts 10507 and 10508).
The ASCO Post Staff
Andrew Kuykendall, MD, of Moffitt Cancer Center, discusses findings from the phase III VERIFY trial, which compared the efficacy of rusfertide vs placebo in patients with polycythemia vera who continue their current standard of care therapy (Abstract LBA3).
The ASCO Post Staff
Jamie E. Chaft, MD, FASCO, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, reviews results of the NeoADAURA trial, which looked at neoadjuvant osimertinib with or without chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone in patients with resectable EGFR-mutated non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (Abstract 8001).