Advertisement


Violaine Randrian, MD, PhD, on Lynch Syndrome, Genetics, and Immunotherapy

2025 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Violaine Randrian, MD, PhD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and CHU/Université de Poitiers, reviews gene-specific outcomes in patients with Lynch syndrome treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced cancer (Abstract 10504). 



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
As you may know, Lynch syndrome is a genetic predisposition, meaning it's defined by a germline mutation in an MMR protein. The different proteins affected are MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2. Patients affected by Lynch syndrome actually develop tumors in gastrointestinal sites, endometrial sites, urological, or pancreas-biliary. The question we asked in that study is, could the different variants affected actually impact the response to immune checkpoint blockade? Because right now, immune checkpoint blockades are the reference treatment in metastatic cancers affecting the Lynch syndrome patients. What we observed is that yes, but no. I'm going to develop that. First part is yes, because when we take the whole cohort, we have a retrospectively collected cohort at Memorial Sloan Kettering throughout 10 years, including Lynch syndrome patients with advanced tumors treated by at least one dose of immune checkpoint blockade, and we considered only the first tumor treated by immune checkpoint blockade. Our primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes were progression-free survival and radiological response rates. Of course, we were also interested in tumor mutational burden and MSI score. When we looked at our primary outcome, which was overall survival, indeed, PMS2 carriers were doing less well than the others. They had a median overall survival of about 21 months, while the other ones were plateauing with about 9 to 10 years of overall survival in advanced tumors. When we looked at median progression-free survival, it was pretty much the same. PMS2 patients had significantly shortened median PFS of 7.2 months, while the others were far longer. Again, with the radiological response rates, we could see a gradient. Only 9% of the PMS2 carriers experienced complete response in that setting, while MSH6 carriers were about 22% to experience that, and the other germline carriers were above 40% of complete response rates, which is amazing in the advanced tumor setting. But we actually saw in our cohort that many of the PMS2 variant carriers actually displayed MSS tumors. They were not MSI-high for 63% of them. So we chose to select only the MSI-high tumors, and then all the effects on the PMS2 carriers were erased. They had the same overall survival, they had the same median progression-free survival, and they experienced about 30% complete response rates. So this means that tomorrow, for PMS2 carrier patients diagnosed with an advanced tumor, we really need to analyze its tumor thoroughly with MSI score and MMR staining to make sure that the tumor is MMR-D/MSI-high. If this tumor is confirmed MSI-high, he has an outstanding prognosis, as good as the other patients. If it's MMR-P/MS-stable tumors, he's not going to respond to immune checkpoint blockade and we should have him under standard-of-care treatment. So that's a small question maybe, but so important for patients that are affected by Lynch syndrome.

Related Videos

Breast Cancer

Hope S. Rugo, MD, FASCO, and Rebecca Alexandra Dent, MD, FASCO, on Breast Cancer Data Highlights: Sequencing of Endocrine Therapy

Hope S. Rugo, MD, FASCO, of City of Hope, and Rebecca Alexandra Dent, MD, FASCO, of National Cancer Centre Singapore, review the results of a biomarker analysis of the DESTINY-Breast06 trial, which evaluated trastuzumab deruxtecan after endocrine therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer (Abstract 1013). They also discuss findings from the SERENA-6 and EMBER-3 trials, also presented at ASCO 2025, and what all this new data means for the sequencing of endocrine therapy in patients with breast cancer. 

Breast Cancer

Erika Hamilton, MD, on ER-Positive HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Vepdegestrant vs Fulvestrant

Erika Hamilton, MD, Director, Breast Cancer Research at Sarah Cannon Research Institute, reviews data from the global, randomized, phase III VERITAC-2 study, which compared vepdegestrant, an oral PROTAC (PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera) estrogen receptor degrader, to fulvestrant among patients with ER-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Vepdegestrant is the first PROTAC to be evaluated in a phase III trial (Abstract LBA1000). 

Pancreatic Cancer

Asaf Maoz, MD, on Pancreatic Surveillance Eligibility Criteria

Asaf Maoz, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Mass General Brigham/Harvard Medical School, discusses the sensitivity of age and family history criteria for determining eligibility for pancreatic cancer surveillance among individuals with a hereditary risk for the malignancy (Abstract 10500). 

Breast Cancer

Giuseppe Curigliano, MD, PhD, on Patient-Reported Outcomes From EMBER-3

Giuseppe Curigliano, MD, PhD, of Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, University of Milano, discusses patient-reported outcomes from the phase III EMBER-3 trial, which investigated treatment with imlunestrant, investigator’s choice of standard endocrine therapy, or imlunestrant plus abemaciclib in patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (Abstract 1001).  

Gastrointestinal Cancer

Yelena Y. Janjigian, MD, on Gastric/GEJ Cancer: Immunotherapy Plus FLOT

Yelena Y. Janjigian, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, presents event-free survival data from the phase III MATTERHORN trial of the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab plus FLOT (fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel chemotherapy) in patients with resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer (LBA5). 

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement