Elena Elez, MD, PhD, on Updated Survival Data From the BREAKWATER Trial
2025 ASCO Annual Meeting
Elena Elez, MD, PhD, of Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, presents updated overall survival data as well as progression-free survival data from the BREAKWATER trial of the first-line use of encorafenib, cetuximab, and mFOLFOX6 in BRAF V600E–mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (LBA3500).
Transcript
Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
We know that between 8 to 12% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer have BRAF V600E–mutated metastatic colorectal cancer. What we know from these illnesses is that it's a poor prognosis group of patients, so the first-line treatments that we have have really limited efficacy, and this was the basis for developing a phase three clinical trial in this patient population. We know as well that encorafenib is an ATP-competitive BRAF inhibitor that, combined with cetuximab, was approved for treatment in the second and third line of metastatic colorectal cancer in this patient population. What we are doing now is exploring the combination of encorafenib, cetuximab, and FOLFOX in frontline therapy for this patient population, compared to encorafenib and cetuximab alone or the standard of care, which is chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab or not. The dual primary endpoint of this clinical trial was progression-free survival and overall response rate, and the secondary objective of this clinical trial was overall survival. Indeed, the results of the BREAKWATER trial were presented at the beginning of 2025. We had the results of overall response rate—the study met one of its primary endpoints—and what we are presenting now at ASCO 2025 are the results of progression-free survival, the other dual primary endpoint, and results on overall survival. Regarding the patient population, it was well balanced. It's nice to see that we have a representation of patients with high tumor burden, meaning three or more metastatic sites of metastasis as well as liver metastasis. Regarding the results on overall survival, the combination of FOLFOX, encorafenib, and cetuximab was statistically significant and clinically meaningful, superior compared to the standard of care. In this case, we found 30 months of overall survival for the patients treated with encorafenib, cetuximab, and FOLFOX, and 15 months for those patients treated with the standard of care. This represents a paradigm change in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer harboring a BRAF V600E mutation, and this regimen will be a new standard of care in the frontline setting for this patient population.
The ASCO Post Staff
Martin Reck, MD, PhD, of LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Germany, discusses data from the phase III AEGEAN trial that studied perioperative durvalumab and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients who were MRD-positive after surgery had significantly worse disease-free survival compared to MRD-negative patients. In addition, mutations in KEAP1 and KMT2C were associated with MRD positivity and reduced benefit from the regimen, identifying a small high-risk subgroup with poor prognosis (Abstract 8009).
The ASCO Post Staff
Erika Hamilton, MD, Director, Breast Cancer Research at Sarah Cannon Research Institute, reviews data from the global, randomized, phase III VERITAC-2 study, which compared vepdegestrant, an oral PROTAC (PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera) estrogen receptor degrader, to fulvestrant among patients with ER-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Vepdegestrant is the first PROTAC to be evaluated in a phase III trial (Abstract LBA1000).
The ASCO Post Staff
Heinz-Josef Lenz, MD, of the University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, reviews analyses from the CheckMate 8HW trial, which evaluated nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs chemotherapy or nivolumab monotherapy for microsatellite instability–high/mismatch repair–deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (Abstract 3501).
The ASCO Post Staff
Praful Ravi, MBBChir, MRCP, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, presents findings from an ICECaP individual patient-data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on a treatment strategy used in high-risk localized prostate cancer (Abstract 5013).
The ASCO Post Staff
Andrew J. Armstrong, MD, MS, of Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke University School of Medicine, discusses the 5-year overall survival analysis of the ARCHES trial, which investigated enzalutamide plus androgen-deprivation therapy in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (Abstract 5005).