Advertisement


Axel Hauschild, MD, on Melanoma: Findings From the PIVOTAL Trial of Daromun vs Surgery

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Axel Hauschild, MD, of Germany’s University of Kiel and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, discusses phase III study results on neoadjuvant intralesional daromun vs immediate surgery for patients with fully resectable, locally advanced melanoma (Abstract LBA9501).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
I'd like to report about a study which was called PIVOTAL. It's a clinical trial on Daromun, a new agent which was not discovered so far in a Phase III trial. The trial design is very simple. It was a one-to-one randomization of 260 patients. In one arm is surgery alone for fully resectable stage III melanoma patients with either lymph node or skin metastases. The other arm was a prior treatment, prior to surgery, with four consecutive injections intratumorally, for the skin and lymph nodes with Daromun. I need to explain Daromun briefly because the agent is new. It's a composition of an L19 antibody directed to fibronectin, which is a crucial molecule for the development of neovascularization, particularly in tumors. And this is linked to interleukin 2, which enhances the number of tumor infiltrating lymphocyte in the tumor, and in addition to another antibody, which is linked to the drug, which is very important for the tumor necrosis, the tumor necrosis factor alpha. It's two component brought to one injection, and this has been done four consecutive times. The result of the study is that the primary endpoint, which is relapse three survival is positive. A positive randomized phase III trial and the hazard ratio is 0.59, corresponding to a more than 40% reduction of the risk for recurrence and the risk of death. Secondary endpoints as distant metastasis-free survival were also positive. In the same ballpark, the hazard ratio here is .60, so 40% reduction in the risk to develop distant metastases. I need to mention that there was a study amendment which allowed us to evaluate the tumor specimens, which have been treated by Daromun, and the rate of pathologically confirmed complete responses is 21%. Further read shots on this is following. Of note, there was almost no systemic toxicity. All of the toxicities were local. It was very well tolerated, it was manageable, and the mean number of administered cycles was three, the median number was four. Almost all patients got the full package of four injections. In general, I need to say and conclude, positive phase III trial, met the primary endpoint and it will be submitted primarily to the European medical agencies very soon and we will see what happens. But I hope that we will have a new drug in our treatment armamentarium for stage three melanoma patients with fully resectable disease in the neoadjuvant intention.

Related Videos

Skin Cancer

Christian U. Blank, MD, PhD, on Melanoma: Potentially Practice-Changing Results From the NADINA Trial

Christian U. Blank, MD, PhD, of the Netherlands Cancer Institute, discusses findings of an investigator-initiated phase III trial showing that neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab followed by response-driven adjuvant treatment improved event-free survival in patients with macroscopic, resectable stage III melanoma compared with adjuvant nivolumab (LBA2)

Skin Cancer

Pauline Funchain, MD, and Caroline Robert, MD, PhD, on Melanoma: New Data on Encorafenib, Binimetinib, Ipilimumab, and Nivolumab

Pauline Funchain, MD, of Stanford University, and Caroline Robert, MD, PhD, of Gustave Roussy, discuss phase II findings showing that combining encorafenib and binimetinib followed by ipilimumab and nivolumab vs ipilimumab and nivolumab can improve progression-free survival in patients with BRAF-V600E/K-mutated melanoma characterized by high lactate dehydrogenase and liver metastases (Abstract LBA9503).

Bladder Cancer

Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, on Urothelial Carcinoma: The DESTINY-Pan Tumor02 Study and New Findings on Sacituzumab Govitecan

Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, of Barts Cancer Institute and the University of London, and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, discuss clinical outcomes of sacituzumab govitecan-hziy after prior exposure to enfortumab vedotin-ejfv in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma, as well as the safety and efficacy of fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki in patients with HER2-expressing bladder tumors (Abstracts 4502 and 4509).

Gynecologic Cancers

Katherine C. Fuh, MD, PhD, on Ovarian Cancer: New Data on Batiraxcept and Paclitaxel

Katherine C. Fuh, MD, PhD, of the University of California, San Francisco, discusses phase III findings of the AXLerate-OC trial, showing that batiraxcept with paclitaxel compared to paclitaxel alone improved progression-free and overall survival in patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer whose tumors were AXL-high in an exploratory analysis (LBA5515).

Leukemia
Lymphoma

William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, on CLL/SLL: Updated Findings on Ibrutinib and Venetoclax

William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses up to 5.5 years of follow-up data from the phase II CAPTIVATE study, showing that in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), fixed duration ibrutinib plus venetoclax continues to provide clinically meaningful progression-free disease in those with high-risk genomic features as well as in the overall population (Abstract 7009).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement