Advertisement


Axel Hauschild, MD, on Melanoma: Findings From the PIVOTAL Trial of Daromun vs Surgery

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Axel Hauschild, MD, of Germany’s University of Kiel and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, discusses phase III study results on neoadjuvant intralesional daromun vs immediate surgery for patients with fully resectable, locally advanced melanoma (Abstract LBA9501).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
I'd like to report about a study which was called PIVOTAL. It's a clinical trial on Daromun, a new agent which was not discovered so far in a Phase III trial. The trial design is very simple. It was a one-to-one randomization of 260 patients. In one arm is surgery alone for fully resectable stage III melanoma patients with either lymph node or skin metastases. The other arm was a prior treatment, prior to surgery, with four consecutive injections intratumorally, for the skin and lymph nodes with Daromun. I need to explain Daromun briefly because the agent is new. It's a composition of an L19 antibody directed to fibronectin, which is a crucial molecule for the development of neovascularization, particularly in tumors. And this is linked to interleukin 2, which enhances the number of tumor infiltrating lymphocyte in the tumor, and in addition to another antibody, which is linked to the drug, which is very important for the tumor necrosis, the tumor necrosis factor alpha. It's two component brought to one injection, and this has been done four consecutive times. The result of the study is that the primary endpoint, which is relapse three survival is positive. A positive randomized phase III trial and the hazard ratio is 0.59, corresponding to a more than 40% reduction of the risk for recurrence and the risk of death. Secondary endpoints as distant metastasis-free survival were also positive. In the same ballpark, the hazard ratio here is .60, so 40% reduction in the risk to develop distant metastases. I need to mention that there was a study amendment which allowed us to evaluate the tumor specimens, which have been treated by Daromun, and the rate of pathologically confirmed complete responses is 21%. Further read shots on this is following. Of note, there was almost no systemic toxicity. All of the toxicities were local. It was very well tolerated, it was manageable, and the mean number of administered cycles was three, the median number was four. Almost all patients got the full package of four injections. In general, I need to say and conclude, positive phase III trial, met the primary endpoint and it will be submitted primarily to the European medical agencies very soon and we will see what happens. But I hope that we will have a new drug in our treatment armamentarium for stage three melanoma patients with fully resectable disease in the neoadjuvant intention.

Related Videos

Leukemia
Lymphoma

William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, on CLL/SLL: Updated Findings on Ibrutinib and Venetoclax

William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses up to 5.5 years of follow-up data from the phase II CAPTIVATE study, showing that in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), fixed duration ibrutinib plus venetoclax continues to provide clinically meaningful progression-free disease in those with high-risk genomic features as well as in the overall population (Abstract 7009).

Multiple Myeloma

Thierry Facon, MD, on Multiple Myeloma: Results From the IMROZ Study on Isatuximab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone

Thierry Facon, MD, of the University of Lille and Lille University Hospital, discusses phase III findings showing for the first time that isatuximab, an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, when given with the standard of care (bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone, or VRd) to patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are transplant-ineligible, may reduce the risk of disease progression or death by 40.4% vs VRd alone (Abstract 7500).

Lung Cancer

Heather Wakelee, MD, on NSCLC: IMpower010 Survival Results After Long-Term Follow-up of Atezolizumab vs Best Supportive Care

Heather Wakelee, MD, of Stanford University Medical Center, discusses phase III findings showing that the disease-free survival benefit with adjuvant atezolizumab continues to translate into a positive overall survival trend vs best supportive care in patients with stage II–IIIA non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These results further support the use of adjuvant atezolizumab in PD-L1–selected populations, according to Dr. Wakelee (LBA8035).

Breast Cancer

Reshma Jagsi, MD, and Christian F. Singer, MD, MPH, on Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Adding a Vaccine to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy

Reshma Jagsi, MD, DPhil, of Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, and Christian F. Singer, MD, MPH, of the Medical University of Vienna, discuss the MUC-1 vaccine tecemotide. When added to standard neoadjuvant systemic therapy for patients with early-stage breast cancer, this vaccine improved distant relapse–free and overall survival rates. Despite the exploratory nature of this observation, says Dr. Singer, this is the first long-term survival benefit of an anticancer vaccine in breast disease reported to date (Abstract 587).

Palliative Care

Joseph A. Greer, PhD, on Lung Cancer: Telehealth vs In-Person Palliative Care

Joseph A. Greer, PhD, of Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, discusses study findings showing the merits of delivering early palliative care via telehealth vs in person to patients with advanced lung cancer. Using telemedicine in this way may potentially improve access to and more broadly disseminate this evidence-based care model (LBA3).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement