Advertisement


Don S. Dizon, MD, on Ovarian and Other Extrarenal Clear Cell Carcinomas: Update on Nivolumab and Ipilimumab

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Don S. Dizon, MD, of Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University and Lifespan Cancer Institute, discusses final phase II results of the BrUOG 354 trial showing that, for patients with ovarian and other extrarenal clear cell cancers, nivolumab and ipilimumab warrant further evaluation against standard treatment, given the historically chemotherapy-resistant nature of the disease (LBA5500).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
I will be presenting BrUOG 354 which is a two-arm randomized non-comparative clinical trial that enrolled people with extrarenal clear cell carcinoma. And tested two regimens, both of them immunotherapeutic. One used nivolumab alone, and the other used nivolumab plus ipilimumab. We enrolled 46 people to this trial, 44 of whom were treated. All of these patients had a diagnosis of clear cell cancers of the gynecological tract. And that's important because clear cell cancers when you compare them to the more common serous type cancers, are associated with a worse prognosis. They do not respond as well to our standard chemotherapies, are prone to relapse more frequently. And unfortunately in the context of recurrent disease, they do not respond as well to treatment. So the prognosis is actually quite poor. This prompted this clinical trial. And it was actually based on some very preliminary data where people were seeing clinical complete responses in folks with clear cell cancers. To this point, before this trial was presented, there had been two trials of immunotherapy in ovarian cancer. One suggesting that clear cell cancer was associated with a five-fold higher response rate compared to other histologies. Although that clinical trial which was done by NRG Oncology group, only enrolled 12 people with clear cell. For that, suggestion was made. And the other was a SWOG clinical trial that enrolled 18 people with ovarian cancer and showing that the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab was effective with some durability, again, based on a very small number of patients. So our trial which enrolled 46 people, is the largest trial in this very rare cancer population. What we can report is that both single-agent nivolumab, and nivolumab and ipilimumab have activity in clear cell cancers, and both are associated with survival outcomes although the one with combination therapy is longer. The overall response rate with single-agent nivolumab is 13%, which includes two partial responses. Median progression free survival is two months, and median overall survival in this trial was less than six months. With the combination therapy, the overall response rate was 33% with five complete responders. Median progression free survival in that arm was 17 months, and median overall survival is 24 months. And importantly for those who responded to the combination, the response was durable. And we had several patients who remain on study past two years, including up to today.

Related Videos

Leukemia

Mazyar Shadman, MD, MPH, on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Update on BTK Inhibitors

Mazyar Shadman, MD, MPH, of Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, discusses a network meta-analysis showing that zanubrutinib appears to be the most efficacious Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor for patients with high-risk relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. It offers delayed disease progression and favorable survival and response, compared with alternative BTK inhibitors (Abstract 7048).

 

Lung Cancer

Minesh P. Mehta, MD, on NSCLC: Tumor Treating Fields for Brain Metastases

Minesh P. Mehta, MD, of Miami Cancer Institute, part of Baptist Health South Florida, discusses results from the METIS (EF-25) trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of tumor treating fields therapy following stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with mutation-negative non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases. Tumor treating fields therapy prolongs time to intracranial disease progression and may postpone whole-brain radiation therapy without declines in quality of life and cognition (Abstract 2008).

Issues in Oncology

Andrew Srisuwananukorn, MD, and Alexander T. Pearson, MD, PhD, on Artificial Intelligence in the Clinic: Understanding How to Use This 21st Century Tool

Andrew Srisuwananukorn, MD, of The Ohio State University, and Alexander T. Pearson, MD, PhD, of the University of Chicago, discuss the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the clinic, its potential benefits in diagnosis and treatment, resources available to help physicians learn more about AI, and what’s coming for the next generation of medical school students.

Lung Cancer

Tony S.K. Mok, MD, on NSCLC: Adagrasib vs Docetaxel in KRAS G12C–Mutated Disease

Tony S.K. Mok, MD, of The Chinese University of Hong Kong, discusses phase III findings from the KRYSTAL-12 study, which showed that adagrasib improved progression-free survival and overall response rate over docetaxel in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer harboring a KRAS G12C mutation who had previously received a platinum-based chemotherapy with anti–PD-(L)1 treatment.

Breast Cancer

Emily L. Podany, MD, on Metastatic Breast Cancer: Racial Differences in Genomic Profiles and Targeted Treatment Use

Emily L. Podany, MD, of Washington University, St. Louis, discusses disparities in the use of PI3K inhibitors for Black patients with estrogen receptor–positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer while other drugs that do not require genomic profiling were similarly used (Abstract 1017). 

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement