Ovarian Cancer 2024: Year at a Glance, Part 1
Thematic Newsreels
Over the past year, several important studies in ovarian cancer have been presented at multiple oncology meetings and published in a number of peer-reviewed publications. In this installment of a two-part discussion for The ASCO Post Newsreels, Ursula A. Matulonis, MD, and Joyce F. Liu, MD, MPH, discuss antibody-drug conjugates and clinical trials including PRIMA and ATHENA. In part two of this feature, Dr. Matulonis and Dr. Liu talk about low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma and an important recently published study.
Filmed November 22, 2024
In hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, co-occurring ESR1 and PIK3CA mutations create therapeutic complexity. Oral SERDs, including elacestrant, retain activity despite PIK3CA co-mutation and may offer an efficacy–toxicity balance compared with PI3K/AKT pathway inhibitors. Treatment selection should incorporate molecular profile, anticipated efficacy, toxicity, and shared decision-making, states Neil M. Iyengar, MD.
The ASCO Post Staff
Erika Hamilton, MD, Director, Breast Cancer Research at Sarah Cannon Research Institute, provides a look at “where we stand in 2025” in the field of oral selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) for patients with estrogen receptor–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. She discusses the first and only FDA-approved oral SERD, elacestrant, indicated for use after CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy in patients with ESR1 mutations; reviews agents still being tested in clinical trials, such as imlunestrant and camizestrant; and highlights the role of oral SERDs as both monotherapies and in novel combinations. As Dr. Hamilton explains, “there haven’t been novel endocrine backbones [for these patients] since fulvestrant.”
Jennifer Gile, MD, of Willamette Valley Cancer Institute, reviews findings from the POLARIX study, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, international phase III trial that evaluated pola-R-CHP—a modified regimen of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP), in which vincristine was replaced with polatuzumab vedotin—as compared with standard R-CHOP, in patients with previously untreated intermediate-risk or high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). With a 5-year update from the trial being published recently, Dr. Gile discusses long-term results, the regimen’s performance in key high-risk subgroups, and how the study altered the front-line management of this disease.
The ASCO Post Staff
Raajit K. Rampal, MD, PhD, Director of the Center for Hematologic Malignancies and the Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Program at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, discusses management strategies for these two conditions often associated with myelofibrosis. He discusses the role of Janus kinase inhibitors; using older therapies in novel ways; how stem cell transplantation is considered; and more.
References
- Marrone M, Morere L, Oladapo A, et al: Hematologic improvement experienced by pacritinib-treated patients with myelofibrosis in real-world clinical settings. Blood 144 (suppl 1):3814, 2024.
- Rampal RK, Verstovsek S, Devlin SM, et al: Safety and efficacy of combined ruxolitinib and thalidomide in patients with myelofibrosis: A phase II study. Blood 134 (suppl 1):4163, 2019.
Benjamin P. Levy, MD, of Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, reviews currently available therapies for patients with KRAS G12C–mutated non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), noting the importance of genomic testing to identify individuals eligible for treatment with these agents. He discusses the two FDA-approved second-line drugs in this space—sotorasib and adagrasib—touching on their efficacy and associated adverse events. He also mentions divarasib, an investigational next-generation KRAS G12C inhibitor, which showed superiority over both sotorasib and adagrasib in a recent head-to-head phase III trial.
