Advertisement


Nikhil Khushalani, MD, on Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatment in CSCC

Thematic Newsreels

Advertisement

Nikhil Khushalani, MD, Vice Chair for the Department of Cutaneous Oncology at Moffitt Cancer Center, reviews advances in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC). He discusses the possibility of de-escalating therapy for patients who respond positively to presurgical agents; how to best select postoperative regimens; and ongoing trials in both spaces. 

References 

  1. Gross ND, Miller DM, Khushalani NI, et al: Neoadjuvant cemiplimab for stage II to IV cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma. N Eng J Med 387:1557-1568, 2022.
  2. Gross ND, Miller DM, Khushalani NI, et al: Neoadjuvant cemiplimab and surgery for stage II-IV cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma: Follow-up and survival outcomes of a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 11:1196-1205, 2023.
  3. Breukers SE, Traets JJH, van Dijk SW, et al: Neoadjuvant ipilimumab and nivolumab in resectable cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: A randomized phase 2 trial. Nature Medicine. October 8, 2025 (early release online).
  4. Ladwa R, Lee JH, McGrath M, et al: Response-adapted surgical and radiotherapy de-escalation in resectable cutaneous squamous cell cancer using pembrolizumab: The De-Squamate study. J Clin Oncol 26:2888-2986, 2025.
  5. Porceddu SV, Bressel M, Poulsen MG, et al: Postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: The randomized phase III TROG 05.01 trial. J Clin Oncol 13:1275-1283, 2018.
  6. Rischin D, Porceddu S, Day F, et al: Adjuvant cemiplimab or placebo in high-risk cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma. N Eng J Med 393:774-785, 2025.
  7. Koyfman SA, Lee JHJ, Mortier L, et al: Phase 3 randomized trial (KEYNOTE-630) of adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo for high-risk locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma following surgery and radiation. 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting. Abstract 6000. Presented May 31, 2025. 



Related Videos

Lung Cancer

Benjamin P. Levy, MD, on Emerging Options for KRAS G12C–Mutated NSCLC: First-Line and Combination Therapies

Benjamin P. Levy, MD, of Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, discusses research into moving KRAS G12C inhibitors from the second to the first line, as well as combining them with immunotherapies and EGFR antibodies. Some potential combinations under investigation include KRAS G12C inhibitors (such as olomorasib, fulzerasib, divarasib, and adagrasib) and single-agent immunotherapy (pembrolizumab) or EGFR-targeting therapies (cetuximab). 

Lymphoma

Matthew Lunning, DO, FACP: How Does CAR T-Cell Therapy Factor in With Tafasitamab in DLBCL?

Access to second-line chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy remains suboptimal in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Matthew Lunning, DO, FACP, of the University of Nebraska Medical Center, explains that prior tafasitamab exposure may theoretically affect CD19 detection or antigen persistence, but clinical evidence demonstrating impaired subsequent CAR T-cell efficacy is lacking. Real-world data have not established CD19 loss, supporting continued consideration of CAR T-cell therapy following tafasitamab-based treatment. 

Prostate Cancer

Oral vs Injectable Agents for Androgen-Deprivation Therapy in Prostate Cancer

Atish D. Choudhury, MD, PhD, a medical oncologist and clinical/translational investigator at the Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses forms of hormonal therapy for patients with prostate cancer, with a focus on the HERO trial, which evaluated oral relugolix vs injectable leuprolide in patients with advanced hormone-sensitive disease. Dr. Choudhury touches on additional analyses from HERO as well, including the effects seen with relugolix on major cardiovascular events.

References

1. Shore ND, Saad F, Cookson MS, et al: Oral relugolix for androgen-deprivation therapy in advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 382:2187-2196, 2020.

2. Saad F, George DJ, Cookson MS, et al: Relugolix vs leuprolide effects on castration resistance-free survival from the phase 3 HERO study in men with advanced prostate cancer. Cancers 15:4854, 2023.

3. Tombal B, Collins S, Morgans AK, et al: Impact of relugolix versus leuprolide on the quality of life of men with advanced prostate cancer: Results from the phase 3 HERO study. Eur Urol 6:579-57, 2023.

4. Spratt DE, George DJ, Shore ND, et al: Efficacy and safety of radiotherapy plus relugolix in men with localized or advanced prostate cancer. JAMA Oncol 5:594-602, 2024.

 

Lymphoma

Matthew Lunning, DO, FACP, on DLBCL: Are frontMIND Data Top of Mind?

The phase III frontMIND trial demonstrated improved outcomes vs R-CHOP in high-risk patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), paralleling the POLARIX trial. Despite efficacy, tafasitamab/lenalidomide/R-CHOP has not achieved comparable guideline adoption. Uncertainty regarding overall survival benefit, limited follow-up, cross-trial comparisons, and implementation complexity may contribute to the underutilization of this regimen despite its manageable toxicity. 

Hematologic Malignancies

Raajit K. Rampal, MD, PhD, on JAK Inhibitors—And Beyond!

Raajit K. Rampal, MD, PhD, Director of the Center for Hematologic Malignancies and the Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Program at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, reviews the four FDA-approved Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors for patients with myelofibrosis, touching upon differences in their mechanisms of action and toxicity profiles. He also discusses clinical trials of add-on drugs to the currently approved JAK inhibitors, which may increase their efficacy and durability, as well as trials of novel JAK inhibitors and immunotherapies targeting CALR.  

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement