Advertisement


Jean-Pascal Machiels, MD, PhD, on Head and Neck Cancer: Recent Data on Pembrolizumab and Chemoradiation Therapy

ESMO Congress 2022

Advertisement

Jean-Pascal Machiels, MD, PhD, of Belgium’s Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc (UCLouvain), discusses the primary results of the phase III KEYNOTE-412 study of pembrolizumab plus chemoradiation therapy (CRT) vs placebo plus CRT for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (Abstract LBA5).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
We presented at ASMO the result of the KEYNOTE-412 trial that compared chemoradiation with pembrolizumab versus chemoradiation plus placebo in patient with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The standard therapy for this group of patient when they're unresected is high-dose cisplatin combined with radiation therapy. With this treatment, the 5-year of our survival is around 50%. We clearly need to improve that. We know that pembrolizumab improves survival in the recurrent and metastatic setting. We have also preclinical model that demonstrate when you gave radiation therapy or cisplatin, that you increase the PD-L1 expression on the tumor, and there are also in preclinical model data that suggests that combining radiotherapy plus anti-PD-1 could improve the outcome. In this study, we select patients unresected, so locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma, and we include patients with locally advanced disease, meaning stage 3 and stage 4 patient. For p16-positive oropharyngeal cancer, we include only T4 or N3 disease. The patients were randomized, so we include 804 patient, randomized 1:1 fashion between chemoradiation plus placebo versus chemoradiation plus pembrolizumab. We gave one dose of placebo or pembrolizumab one week before the cycle of chemoradiation, and in total, we gave 17 cycles. The primary endpoint was event-free survival. The primary endpoint in this trial on the intent-to-treat population was not met, but we observe a favorable trend in favor of improved event-free survival in the group of patients that received chemoradiation plus pembrolizumab. The hazard ratio was 0.83 and the p-value, 0.04, but the efficacy boundary was 0.02 in this study. The 2-year event-free survival with was 56% in placebo and 63% in pembrolizumab. After that, we performed an exploratory analysis where we look at patient with a high expression of PD-L1 on their tumor, CPS 20 or higher. In this group of patients, the 2-year event-free survival was, in placebo, 62%, and in pembrolizumab, 71%. For this group of patients, we also observe a favorable of overall survival benefit, with a 3-year of a survival rate of 73% in control and 79% in pembrolizumab. So we conclude by saying that this trial did not meet the primary endpoint, although there is a favorable trend in favor of pembrolizumab with chemoradiation. This study gave important information, because probably we need to select the patient altered exploratory. It seemed that patients with high CPS score on the tumor could benefit of this approach. So future trials should probably try to select patient with a tumor that express PD-L1. Maybe also in the future, we should try to combine differently chemoradiation with pembrolizumab. Probably the adjuvant setting or the neoadjuvant setting will be better than the concomitant treatment.

Related Videos

Colorectal Cancer

Marinde J.G. Bond, PhD Candidate, on Colorectal Liver Metastases: FOLFOX/FOLFIRI, Bevacizumab, and Panitumumab

Marinde J.G. Bond, PhD Candidate, of the University Medical Center, Utrecht, discusses phase III findings from the CAIRO5 study of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group, the first such trial in defined subgroups of patients with initially unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases and left-sided and RAS/BRAF V600E wild-type tumor. The study compared FOLFOX/FOLFIRI plus either bevacizumab or panitumumab (Abstract LBA21).

 

Kidney Cancer

Nizar M. Tannir, MD, on RCC: Data on Bempegaldesleukin Plus Nivolumab vs Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Untreated Disease

Nizar M. Tannir, MD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses phase III findings from the PIVOT-09 study, which compared bempegaldesleukin plus nivolumab with the investigator’s choice of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (either sunitinib or cabozantinib) in patients with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (Abstract LBA68).

Lung Cancer

Tony S.K. Mok, MD, on NSCLC: Review of Recent Data From the SUNRISE and ORIENT-31 Trials

Tony S.K. Mok, MD, of The Chinese University of Hong Kong, discusses two late-breaking abstracts presented at ESMO 2022: the phase II SUNRISE study, which compared sintilimab plus anlotinib vs platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); and the ORIENT-31 trial, which compared sintilimab with or without IBI305 (a bevacizumab biosimilar) plus chemotherapy in patients with EGFR-mutated nonsquamous NSCLC who experienced disease progression on EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Breast Cancer
Immunotherapy

Marleen Kok, MD, PhD, on Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Nivolumab Monotherapy or in Combination Therapy

Marleen Kok, MD, PhD, of The Netherlands Cancer Institute in Amsterdam, discusses the initial results from the BELLINI trial, which tested whether short-term preoperative nivolumab, either as monotherapy or in combination with low-dose doxorubicin or novel immunotherapy combinations, can induce immune activation in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (Abstract LBA13).

Gynecologic Cancers

Paul A. DiSilvestro, MD, on Ovarian Cancer: New Data on Olaparib in Newly Diagnosed Disease

Paul A. DiSilvestro, MD, of Women & Infants Hospital and the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, discusses overall survival results after a 7-year follow-up of the SOLO1/GOG-3004 trial for patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer and a BRCA mutation who received maintenance olaparib. Dr. DiSilvestro details the increasing role of such PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer treatment and their benefit to patients (Abstract 517O).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement