Advertisement


Danny Rischin, MD, on Adjuvant Cemiplimab for High-Risk CSCC

ASCO 2026

Advertisement

Danny Rischin, MD, of Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, talks about data from the disease-free survival analyses of the C-POST study, which were conducted per high-risk criteria and start time after radiotherapy. C-POST evaluated adjuvant cemiplimab-rwlc for patients with high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) (Abstract 6083).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The C-POST trial is a phase 3 trial in patients with high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. They compared adjuvant cemiplimab with placebo. In this trial, patients who had high-risk cutaneous SCC were randomized to either receive cemiplimab for 48 weeks or placebo. These patients had to have had surgery with complete macroscopic resection and have completed radiotherapy. This was a positive trial with clinically meaningful and statistically significant results: a hazard ratio of 0.32 and a P value of less than .001. So, a 68% reduction in the risk of disease recurrence or death, and this included a decrease in risk of locoregional recurrence and distant recurrences. At this ASCO meeting, we presented further analysis to better understand the benefits of cemiplimab as an adjuvant treatment in this population. In the C-POST trial, patients were selected based on high-risk criteria. These high-risk criteria could be nodal, such as having a lymph node that was greater than 2 cm with extranodal extension or more than 3 nodes, or several high-risk nonnodal criteria, such as in-transit metastases, T4 disease, perineural invasion, if there was involvement clinically or radiologically, or recurrent disease with other high-risk features. So what we wanted to see in these further analyses is whether all of these groups conveyed a disease-free benefit with cemiplimab compared with placebo. So we looked at all of these nodal and nonnodal criteria, and in fact, in every single group, there was similar disease-free benefit with cemiplimab versus placebo. The other thing that we looked at was the interval between completion of radiation and randomization. The protocol stipulated that patients had to start treatment or at least be randomized between 2 and 11 weeks after completing their radiotherapy. The median was 5.6 weeks. So we looked at the group that started within 2 to 6 weeks and the group that started in 6 to 11 weeks. And in fact, there was a similar disease-free benefit, irrespective of the interval since radiation. These analyses were conducted with updated follow-up, with a median follow-up of 30 months, and the overall disease-free benefit is still significant at 0.335. These results further reinforce that this benefit from adjuvant cemiplimab was seen in all the high-risk groups and irrespective of the interval from radiation. Further follow-up is ongoing of the C-POST trial, and longer-term follow-up and survival analysis will be presented at a later date.

Related Videos

Jennifer J. Knox, MD, FRCPC, on RASolute 302 Findings: Expert Point of View

Jennifer J. Knox, MD, FRCPC, of Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, provides expert commentary on a phase III study of daraxonrasib vs chemotherapy in previously treated metastatic pancreatic cancer (Abstract LBA5).

Lillian L. Siu, MD, on Liquid KRAS Mutation Screening in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Lillian L. Siu, MD, of Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, discusses the clinical utility of liquid biopsy testing for common KRAS variants to facilitate matching patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to appropriate early-phase trials (Abstract 3049).

Breast Cancer
Genomics/Genetics

Paolo Tarantino, MD, PhD, on HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Overall Survival by Genomic Profile

Paolo Tarantino, MD, PhD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, reviews the results of a large clinicogenomic database study that looked at overall survival by genomic profile among patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Patients with mutations in key DNA repair genes experienced a numerically worse prognosis, representing an unmet need for drug development, say researchers (Abstract 1045). 

Lung Cancer

Giannis S. Mountzios, MD, on SCLC: Intracranial Effect of Tarlatamab vs Chemotherapy

Giannis S. Mountzios, MD, of Henry Dunant Hospital Center, discusses findings from a post hoc analysis of the phase III DeLLphi-304 trial, which examined the intracranial efficacy of tarlatamab vs chemotherapy as second-line therapy for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (Abstract 8006).

Leukemia

Daniel A. Ermann, MD, on First-Line Therapy for CLL: Real-World Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries

Daniel A. Ermann, MD, of Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, presents findings from a retrospective cohort study which used a large U.S. database to evaluate clinical outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries treated with first-line therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (Abstract 7047). 

To learn more about this data, read a related article in Oncology and Therapy.

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement