Advertisement


Danny Rischin, MD, on Adjuvant Cemiplimab for High-Risk CSCC

ASCO 2026

Advertisement

Danny Rischin, MD, of Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, talks about data from the disease-free survival analyses of the C-POST study, which were conducted per high-risk criteria and start time after radiotherapy. C-POST evaluated adjuvant cemiplimab-rwlc for patients with high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) (Abstract 6083).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The C-POST trial is a phase 3 trial in patients with high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. They compared adjuvant cemiplimab with placebo. In this trial, patients who had high-risk cutaneous SCC were randomized to either receive cemiplimab for 48 weeks or placebo. These patients had to have had surgery with complete macroscopic resection and have completed radiotherapy. This was a positive trial with clinically meaningful and statistically significant results: a hazard ratio of 0.32 and a P value of less than .001. So, a 68% reduction in the risk of disease recurrence or death, and this included a decrease in risk of locoregional recurrence and distant recurrences. At this ASCO meeting, we presented further analysis to better understand the benefits of cemiplimab as an adjuvant treatment in this population. In the C-POST trial, patients were selected based on high-risk criteria. These high-risk criteria could be nodal, such as having a lymph node that was greater than 2 cm with extranodal extension or more than 3 nodes, or several high-risk nonnodal criteria, such as in-transit metastases, T4 disease, perineural invasion, if there was involvement clinically or radiologically, or recurrent disease with other high-risk features. So what we wanted to see in these further analyses is whether all of these groups conveyed a disease-free benefit with cemiplimab compared with placebo. So we looked at all of these nodal and nonnodal criteria, and in fact, in every single group, there was similar disease-free benefit with cemiplimab versus placebo. The other thing that we looked at was the interval between completion of radiation and randomization. The protocol stipulated that patients had to start treatment or at least be randomized between 2 and 11 weeks after completing their radiotherapy. The median was 5.6 weeks. So we looked at the group that started within 2 to 6 weeks and the group that started in 6 to 11 weeks. And in fact, there was a similar disease-free benefit, irrespective of the interval since radiation. These analyses were conducted with updated follow-up, with a median follow-up of 30 months, and the overall disease-free benefit is still significant at 0.335. These results further reinforce that this benefit from adjuvant cemiplimab was seen in all the high-risk groups and irrespective of the interval from radiation. Further follow-up is ongoing of the C-POST trial, and longer-term follow-up and survival analysis will be presented at a later date.

Related Videos

Breast Cancer

Sara A. Hurvitz, MD, FACP, on Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: More Results From ASCENT-03

Sara A. Hurvitz, MD, FACP, of Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, provides an update focusing on progression-free survival after next line of treatment and subsequent therapies among patients enrolled in the ASCENT-03 trial. The study compared sacituzumab govitecan vs chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (Abstract 1001).

Lymphoma

John M. Burke, MD, on Newly Diagnosed DLBCL: frontMIND Trial

John M. Burke, MD, of SCRI at Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers I The US Oncology Network, presents findings from the phase III frontMIND trial, which evaluated tafasitamab plus lenalidomide and R-CHOP in patients newly diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (Abstract LBA7000).

Gastrointestinal Cancer
Gastroesophageal Cancer

Yelena Y. Janjigian, MD, FASCO, on Safety Results From DESTINY-Gastric03

Yelena Y. Janjigian, MD, FASCO, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, discusses safety results for DESTINY-Gastric03 Part 2 (arms D and F) and Part 4. The trial evaluated first-line fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki–based regimens in advanced HER2-expressing gastric cancer, gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, and esophageal carcinoma (Abstract 4002).

Pancreatic Cancer

Asaf Maoz, MD, on Pancreatic Cancer Screening: Potential Blood-Based Biomarkers

Asaf Maoz, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Mass General Brigham, and Harvard Medical School, talks about whether prospective assessment of CA 19-9 has utility as part of pancreatic cancer surveillance among high-risk individuals (Abstract 10527). 

Breast Cancer

Jame Abraham, MD, FACP, on First Results of the OPTIMA Trial in Breast Cancer: Expert Perspective

Jame Abraham, MD, FACP, of Cleveland Clinic, offers his thoughts on findings from OPTIMA (Optimal Personalised Treatment of early breast cancer using Multi-parameter Analysis), an international randomized controlled trial comparing chemotherapy decisions made with the Prosigna (PAM50) gene expression test with standard treatment in mostly node-positive patients with high clinical risk ER-positive HER2-negative early breast cancer (Abstract 500). 

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement