Danny Rischin, MD, on Adjuvant Cemiplimab for High-Risk CSCC
ASCO 2026
Danny Rischin, MD, of Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, talks about data from the disease-free survival analyses of the C-POST study, which were conducted per high-risk criteria and start time after radiotherapy. C-POST evaluated adjuvant cemiplimab-rwlc for patients with high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) (Abstract 6083).
Transcript
Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The C-POST trial is a phase 3 trial in patients with high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. They compared adjuvant cemiplimab with placebo. In this trial, patients who had high-risk cutaneous SCC were randomized to either receive cemiplimab for 48 weeks or placebo. These patients had to have had surgery with complete macroscopic resection and have completed radiotherapy. This was a positive trial with clinically meaningful and statistically significant results: a hazard ratio of 0.32 and a P value of less than .001. So, a 68% reduction in the risk of disease recurrence or death, and this included a decrease in risk of locoregional recurrence and distant recurrences. At this ASCO meeting, we presented further analysis to better understand the benefits of cemiplimab as an adjuvant treatment in this population. In the C-POST trial, patients were selected based on high-risk criteria. These high-risk criteria could be nodal, such as having a lymph node that was greater than 2 cm with extranodal extension or more than 3 nodes, or several high-risk nonnodal criteria, such as in-transit metastases, T4 disease, perineural invasion, if there was involvement clinically or radiologically, or recurrent disease with other high-risk features. So what we wanted to see in these further analyses is whether all of these groups conveyed a disease-free benefit with cemiplimab compared with placebo. So we looked at all of these nodal and nonnodal criteria, and in fact, in every single group, there was similar disease-free benefit with cemiplimab versus placebo. The other thing that we looked at was the interval between completion of radiation and randomization. The protocol stipulated that patients had to start treatment or at least be randomized between 2 and 11 weeks after completing their radiotherapy. The median was 5.6 weeks. So we looked at the group that started within 2 to 6 weeks and the group that started in 6 to 11 weeks. And in fact, there was a similar disease-free benefit, irrespective of the interval since radiation. These analyses were conducted with updated follow-up, with a median follow-up of 30 months, and the overall disease-free benefit is still significant at 0.335. These results further reinforce that this benefit from adjuvant cemiplimab was seen in all the high-risk groups and irrespective of the interval from radiation. Further follow-up is ongoing of the C-POST trial, and longer-term follow-up and survival analysis will be presented at a later date.
The ASCO Post Staff
Shubham Pant, MD, MBBS, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses the practice-changing results of the phase III RASolute 302 study, which showed that daraxonrasib doubled median overall survival compared with standard chemotherapy in pretreated metastatic pancreatic cancer (Abstract LBA5).
The ASCO Post Staff
Jame Abraham, MD, FACP, of Cleveland Clinic, provides an update on the DESTINY-Breast05 trial, which is an ongoing phase III trial investigating postneoadjuvant trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) as compared with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer with residual invasive disease and node-positive disease at surgery or inoperable disease at diagnosis. Dr. Abraham makes special note of rates of interstitial lung disease seen in the trial and methods of management.
Wassim McHayleh, MD, FACP, MBA, of AdventHealth Cancer Institute, provides an update from the phase Ib/II ELEVATE trial, an open-label umbrella study. This report focuses on updated safety and preliminary efficacy for elacestrant and capivasertib for patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who experienced disease progression on first-line endocrine therapy plus CDK4/6 inhibition (Abstract 1098).
The ASCO Post Staff
Ronald C. Chen, MD, MPH, FASCO, of the University of Kansas Medical Center, presents health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data from the AMBASSADOR trial, which showed that in patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma after radical surgery, adjuvant pembrolizumab for 1 year approximately doubled disease-free survival, causes fatigue and dyspnea which modestly impacted physical function and ability to perform certain roles (such as work and hobbies), without impact on overall quality of life (Abstract 4513).
The ASCO Post Staff
Ramez N. Eskander, MD, of UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, presents an updated overall survival analysis and examination of subsequent therapy in patients with endometrial cancer treated with pembrolizumab plus carboplatin/paclitaxel as compared to carboplatin/paclitaxel plus placebo in the NRG-GY018 trial (Abstract 5502).