Bjorn Henning Gronberg, MD, PhD, on Extensive-Stage SCLC: Concurrent TRT and Chemoimmunotherapy
ASCO 2026
Bjorn Henning Gronberg, MD, PhD, of St. Olav’s Hospital, discusses findings from a phase III trial of concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) plus platinum/etoposide chemotherapy and the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (Abstract LBA8005).
Transcript
Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
So the background of the trial is that after the introduction of immunotherapy, we saw the first advance in the treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. But still most patients relapse within one to two years and we definitely need better treatment. There were some promising results from an older Dutch trial indicating that consolidation thoracic radiotherapy after chemo alone improved survival, and several smaller preclinical studies indicate that there might be a synergistic effect of combining radiotherapy with immunotherapy. So we combine this and the main objective of the trial was to investigate whether survival is improved if you combine thoracic radiotherapy with chemoimmunotherapy. The study was prematurely closed due to an interim analysis that did not find any indications of an effect and there were also concerns from our safety and data monitoring committee that there were more serious adverse events in the experimental group. Overall, we did not find any signs of prolongation of survival among patients who received TRT and there were also more adverse events, but maybe most concerning there were more treatment related deaths. So overall, we conclude that thoracic radiotherapy should not be routinely given to these patients, but of course should probably still be considered for patients who have symptoms from tumor compression from central airways and so on. Especially since I am, as far as I know, there are only results from another randomized trial that was the German TREASURE trial that was also closed prematurely for the same reasons. This is a little bit surprising considering that quite many retrospective studies are indicating a survival benefit, but due to the results we have from randomized trials, this should probably not be routinely given, at least not until we have results from other ongoing studies investigating the same topic.
Related Videos
The ASCO Post Staff
Katharina C. Kaehler, MD, of University Hospital (UKSH), Campus Kiel, presents an update on the primary outcome and sensitivity analyses from the PIVOTAL phase III trial of daromun, a combination of two fibronectin-targeting immunocytokines (L19IL2 and L19TNF), as a neoadjuvant intralesional therapy in patients with resectable, locally advanced stage III melanoma (Abstract LBA9517).
The ASCO Post Staff
Nicholas C. Turner, MD, PhD, of the Royal Marsden Hospital, Institute of Cancer Research, discusses results from the primary analysis of the persevERA BC trial, which investigated giredestrant plus palbociclib vs letrozole plus palbociclib as first-line therapy in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (Abstract LBA1006).
The ASCO Post Staff
Julie R. Gralow, MD, FACP, FASCO, Chief Medical Officer and Executive Vice President of ASCO, provides an overview of the highlights of this year’s meeting, including practice-changing data included in the Plenary Session.
The ASCO Post Staff
John M. Burke, MD, of SCRI at Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers I The US Oncology Network, presents findings from the phase III frontMIND trial, which evaluated tafasitamab plus lenalidomide and R-CHOP in patients newly diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (Abstract LBA7000).
Joel W. Neal, MD, PhD, of Stanford Cancer Institute, discusses updated overall survival data from cohort C of the CHRYSALIS-2 trial, which looked at first-line amivantamab plus lazertinib in previously untreated patients with atypical EGFR-mutated advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (Abstract 8501).