Emily L. Podany, MD, on Metastatic Breast Cancer: Racial Differences in Genomic Profiles and Targeted Treatment Use
2024 ASCO Annual Meeting
Emily L. Podany, MD, of Washington University, St. Louis, discusses disparities in the use of PI3K inhibitors for Black patients with estrogen receptor–positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer while other drugs that do not require genomic profiling were similarly used (Abstract 1017).
Transcript
Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The study that I'm presenting is a multicenter consortium study. It consists of 1,327 patients that we looked at both genomic data through the liquid biopsy Guardant360 and clinical data that we got manually from the electronic medical record system. We decided to use this large multi-consortium database to ask questions about targeted treatment use in Black versus White patients. So we found that Black and White patients had equal incidence of PIK3CA mutations. But despite this equal incidence, they had differences in targeted treatment use. Black patients ended up having significantly less targeted treatment use than White patients in this dataset. Specifically, this was for these PI3 kinase inhibitor use. When we looked at mTOR inhibitor use and CDK4/6 inhibitor use, which does not require a specific finding in ctDNA or liquid biopsy, we actually didn't find any differences. So the only targeted treatment use differences was when there was a specific targeted finding in the ctDNA profiling.
The other thing we looked at after that was we looked at overall survival in this cohort. We'd previously reported overall survival in the overall 1,327 patients, and then we looked specifically at HR-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients, and we looked at ER positive, PR negative HER2 negative, and ER positive, PR positive HER2 negative. The PR-negative patients did significantly worse in terms of overall survival and Black patients with ER positive, PR negative HER2 negative did significantly worse than White patients with the same profile. Finally, we looked at clinical trial enrollment, so we looked at whether the patients with this PIK3CA mutation with metastatic breast cancer were enrolled in clinical trials at the same rate between Black and White patients. So we found that Black patients were significantly less likely to be enrolled in a clinical trial than White patients.
The ASCO Post Staff
Ana C. Garrido-Castro, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, reports the results from the phase II SACI-IO trial in patients with hormone receptor–positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer who received sacituzumab govitecan-hziy with or without pembrolizumab (LBA1004).
The ASCO Post Staff
Suzanne Trudel, MD, of Canada’s Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, discusses phase III findings showing that, in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who had one or more prior lines of treatment, belantamab mafodotin-blmf plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone improved progression-free survival and showed a favorable overall survival trend compared with pomalidomide plus bortezomib and dexamethasone.
The ASCO Post Staff
Peter Riedell, MD, of The University of Chicago, discusses phase III results on the use of tucidinostat plus R-CHOP in patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with double expression of MYC and BCL2. The regimen appeared to improve event-free survival and complete response rates vs R-CHOP in the front-line setting. As this is an interim analysis, longer-term follow-up will be needed to better understand its impact, says Dr. Riedell.
The ASCO Post Staff
Joseph A. Greer, PhD, of Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, discusses study findings showing the merits of delivering early palliative care via telehealth vs in person to patients with advanced lung cancer. Using telemedicine in this way may potentially improve access to and more broadly disseminate this evidence-based care model (LBA3).
The ASCO Post Staff
Minesh P. Mehta, MD, of Miami Cancer Institute, part of Baptist Health South Florida, discusses results from the METIS (EF-25) trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of tumor treating fields therapy following stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with mutation-negative non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases. Tumor treating fields therapy prolongs time to intracranial disease progression and may postpone whole-brain radiation therapy without declines in quality of life and cognition (Abstract 2008).