Advertisement


Emily L. Podany, MD, on Metastatic Breast Cancer: Racial Differences in Genomic Profiles and Targeted Treatment Use

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Emily L. Podany, MD, of Washington University, St. Louis, discusses disparities in the use of PI3K inhibitors for Black patients with estrogen receptor–positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer while other drugs that do not require genomic profiling were similarly used (Abstract 1017). 



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The study that I'm presenting is a multicenter consortium study. It consists of 1,327 patients that we looked at both genomic data through the liquid biopsy Guardant360 and clinical data that we got manually from the electronic medical record system. We decided to use this large multi-consortium database to ask questions about targeted treatment use in Black versus White patients. So we found that Black and White patients had equal incidence of PIK3CA mutations. But despite this equal incidence, they had differences in targeted treatment use. Black patients ended up having significantly less targeted treatment use than White patients in this dataset. Specifically, this was for these PI3 kinase inhibitor use. When we looked at mTOR inhibitor use and CDK4/6 inhibitor use, which does not require a specific finding in ctDNA or liquid biopsy, we actually didn't find any differences. So the only targeted treatment use differences was when there was a specific targeted finding in the ctDNA profiling. The other thing we looked at after that was we looked at overall survival in this cohort. We'd previously reported overall survival in the overall 1,327 patients, and then we looked specifically at HR-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients, and we looked at ER positive, PR negative HER2 negative, and ER positive, PR positive HER2 negative. The PR-negative patients did significantly worse in terms of overall survival and Black patients with ER positive, PR negative HER2 negative did significantly worse than White patients with the same profile. Finally, we looked at clinical trial enrollment, so we looked at whether the patients with this PIK3CA mutation with metastatic breast cancer were enrolled in clinical trials at the same rate between Black and White patients. So we found that Black patients were significantly less likely to be enrolled in a clinical trial than White patients.

Related Videos

Leukemia
Immunotherapy

Allison M. Winter, MD, on Richter Transformation: New Data on a CAR T-Cell Treatment

Allison M. Winter, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, discusses real-world outcomes with lisocabtagene maraleucel in patients with Richter transformation, a difficult-to-treat population with a poor prognosis. Data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research showed this therapy provided clinical benefit with a high complete response rate (Abstract 7010).

Kidney Cancer

Brian I. Rini, MD, on Renal Cell Carcinoma: Exploratory Biomarker Results

Brian I. Rini, MD, of Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, discusses phase III findings of the KEYNOTE-426 study of pembrolizumab plus axitinib vs sunitinib for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. He details the exploratory biomarker results, including RNA sequencing, whole-exome sequencing, and PD-L1 (Abstract 4505).

Breast Cancer

Eva M. Ciruelos, MD, PhD, on HER2-Positive and PAM50 Luminal Breast Cancer: Primary Results From the PATRICIA Trial

Eva M. Ciruelos, MD, PhD, of Spain’s Hospital 12 de Octubre and the Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre, discusses phase II data showing that the combination of palbociclib, trastuzumab, and endocrine therapy improved progression-free survival in patients with previously treated PAM50 luminal A or B, HER2-positive advanced breast cancer, as compared with treatment of physicians’ choice (Abstract 1008).

Leukemia
Lymphoma

William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, on CLL/SLL: Updated Findings on Ibrutinib and Venetoclax

William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses up to 5.5 years of follow-up data from the phase II CAPTIVATE study, showing that in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), fixed duration ibrutinib plus venetoclax continues to provide clinically meaningful progression-free disease in those with high-risk genomic features as well as in the overall population (Abstract 7009).

Breast Cancer

Lisa A. Carey, MD, and Kevin Kalinsky, MD, on Advanced Breast Cancer: New Data on Abemaciclib and Fulvestrant From the postMONARCH Trial

Lisa A. Carey, MD, of University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Kevin Kalinsky, MD, of the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, discuss the first phase III findings showing a benefit of continued CDK4/6 inhibition with abemaciclib plus fulvestrant, following disease progression in patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (LBA1001).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement