Advertisement


Laurence Albiges, MD, PhD, on Renal Cell Carcinoma: Biomarker Analysis of the IMmotion010 Study

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Laurence Albiges, MD, PhD, of Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, discusses phase III findings showing that high baseline serum KIM-1 levels were associated with poorer prognosis but improved clinical outcomes with atezolizumab vs placebo in patients with renal cell carcinoma at increased risk of recurrence after resection. Increased post-treatment KIM-1 levels were found to be associated with worse disease-free survival (Abstract 4506).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Currently, standard of care in the adjuvant setting is pembrolizumab for patients that have had surgery and that are considered at high risk of recurrence for RCC. What we don't know is how we can better select our patients. At this recent ASCO, I had the chance to present an exploratory analysis within the IMmotion 010 study. This trial tested atezolizumab in the adjuvant setting did not demonstrate the disease-free survival benefit. But here the question is, can we do a better job with defining circulating biomarker? And so the work conducted, which is translational exploratory analysis, was a two-step process, the first one being identifying circulating proteins that were associated with an increase at time of disease recurrence. And when screening over 3000 proteins, one stands out, KIM-1, which stands for kidney injury molecule one, which clearly had an increase at the time of disease recurrence. Then we took on to the next step, which was to assess the association of high baseline KIM-1, meaning after surgery with disease-free survival. And we confirmed that KIM-1 is a prognostic circulating biomarker that was actually already demonstrated in the past in other adjuvant studies, but it is the first time that not only we saw a prognostic value, but also a potentially predictive value. Indeed, in our data sets, not only patients with high KIM-1 had a worst disease-free survival, but atezolizumab was associated with an increased benefit with regard to disease-free survival over placebo in those patients with high baseline KIM-1. Furthermore, we showed that the kinetic of this circulating biomarker is important because any increase in this biomarker was associated with worse DFS. Ultimately, we further validate the fact that patients at time of disease recurrence had a significant increase in KIM-1 using a different assay than the screening one. So taken all together, what these data are showing us is that circulating KIM-1 is a potential biomarker for prognostic assessment in the adjuvant space, but also potentially for the predictive use of checkpoint inhibitor in the adjuvant setting. And that actually come as a confirmation of prior work recently presented within the CheckMate 914 study as well. Of course, it will require further prospective validation, but this biomarker could help us in the setting of the adjuvant space to define a go/no-go strategy and potentially as well for monitoring patients and detect earlier recurrence. It is the first potential minimal residual disease biomarker that is being discussed in RCC.

Related Videos

Lymphoma

Peter Riedell, MD, on DLBCL: Expert Commentary on the DEB Study

Peter Riedell, MD, of The University of Chicago, discusses phase III results on the use of tucidinostat plus R-CHOP in patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with double expression of MYC and BCL2. The regimen appeared to improve event-free survival and complete response rates vs R-CHOP in the front-line setting. As this is an interim analysis, longer-term follow-up will be needed to better understand its impact, says Dr. Riedell.

Breast Cancer

Emily L. Podany, MD, on Metastatic Breast Cancer: Racial Differences in Genomic Profiles and Targeted Treatment Use

Emily L. Podany, MD, of Washington University, St. Louis, discusses disparities in the use of PI3K inhibitors for Black patients with estrogen receptor–positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer while other drugs that do not require genomic profiling were similarly used (Abstract 1017). 

Skin Cancer

Pauline Funchain, MD, and Caroline Robert, MD, PhD, on Melanoma: New Data on Encorafenib, Binimetinib, Ipilimumab, and Nivolumab

Pauline Funchain, MD, of Stanford University, and Caroline Robert, MD, PhD, of Gustave Roussy, discuss phase II findings showing that combining encorafenib and binimetinib followed by ipilimumab and nivolumab vs ipilimumab and nivolumab can improve progression-free survival in patients with BRAF-V600E/K-mutated melanoma characterized by high lactate dehydrogenase and liver metastases (Abstract LBA9503).

Multiple Myeloma

Amrita Y. Krishnan, MD, and Paula Rodríguez-Otero, MD, PhD, on Multiple Myeloma: Findings From the PERSEUS Trial on a Regimen for Transplant-Eligible Patients

Amrita Y. Krishnan, MD, of the City of Hope Cancer Center, and Paula Rodríguez-Otero, MD, PhD, of Spain’s Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, discuss data that appear to further support daratumumab plus bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone as a new standard of care for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (Abstract 7502).

Kidney Cancer

Brian I. Rini, MD, on Renal Cell Carcinoma: Exploratory Biomarker Results

Brian I. Rini, MD, of Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, discusses phase III findings of the KEYNOTE-426 study of pembrolizumab plus axitinib vs sunitinib for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. He details the exploratory biomarker results, including RNA sequencing, whole-exome sequencing, and PD-L1 (Abstract 4505).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement