Advertisement


Anthony M. Joshua, MBBS, PhD, on Low-Risk Prostate Cancer and Metformin: New Trial Data

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Anthony M. Joshua, MBBS, PhD, of Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, discusses results from the MAST study, which explored the question of whether metformin could reduce disease progression in men with low-risk prostate cancer who are undergoing active surveillance (LBA5002).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
We designed the study back in 2012. It was a study of metformin, men with active surveillance for prostate cancer, and there was a lot of rationales as to why metformin would be useful in prostate cancer. There's laboratory studies that we've done speaking to the importance of metformin inhibiting mTOR as well as having epigenetic effects. There's data from other groups looking at the beneficial effect of metformin on the tumor microenvironment. There's epidemiological studies that suggest that diabetic men who take metformin do better for their prostate cancer treatment. There's combination studies that we've done demonstrating that, in some of the pivotal prostate cancer studies, the men who took metformin did better in the studies with abiraterone. So we put all those things together. We thought, well, metformin may be the perfect medication to give men undergoing active surveillance of prostate cancer. So from the period of 2013 to 2023, we randomised 400 men, approximately 204 on each arm to take metformin versus a matched placebo when they were undergoing active surveillance. And active surveillance is briefly, as per NCCN, very low to low risk criteria. Basically men with low volume Gleason 6 disease, and there's more details in the presentation, but those men were randomised over that period, and the endpoint was defined as either being therapeutic progression or pathological progression. The pathological progression was biopsies done at 18 and 36 months, and their therapeutic progression was any treatment for prostate cancer. And in brief, we found no difference between the arms, and in fact, there was a couple of concerning trends. One trend was that men who had a high BMI actually seemed to do worse on metformin for reasons we don't understand. And a priori, you would think those men would do better on metformin because they may lose weight, but that was not the case. And also there seemed to be a slight trend towards men progressing with higher Gleason scores who took metformin compared to those men who took placebo. This is a little bit worrying, and certainly we need to do more research to understand why this is the case. But this study was an academic study across 12 centers in Canada, funded through, essentially philanthropy, the Prostate Cancer Foundation, and the Canadian Cancer Association. So taken together, I think this has been a great academic effort. It will seed a lot of future research to understand the role of metformin and those types of drugs in men with and without diabetes for prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance.

Related Videos

Skin Cancer

Omid Hamid, MD, on Cutaneous Melanoma: Update on a Bispecific Protein Under Study

Omid Hamid, MD, of The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, a Cedars-Sinai affiliate, discusses updated data on IMC-F106C, a novel bispecific protein that, in a phase I safety and efficacy study, exhibited clinical activity in patients with unresectable or metastatic cutaneous melanoma who were pretreated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. A phase III trial of IMC-F106C with nivolumab in the first-line setting of metastatic disease has been initiated (NCT06112314; Abstract 9507).

Leukemia

Mazyar Shadman, MD, MPH, on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Update on BTK Inhibitors

Mazyar Shadman, MD, MPH, of Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, discusses a network meta-analysis showing that zanubrutinib appears to be the most efficacious Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor for patients with high-risk relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. It offers delayed disease progression and favorable survival and response, compared with alternative BTK inhibitors (Abstract 7048).

 

Leukemia
Lymphoma

Muhit Özcan, MD, on CLL/SLL: Report on a Still-Recruiting International Study of Nemtabrutinib, Venetoclax, and Rituximab

Muhit Özcan, MD, of Turkey’s Ankara University School of Medicine, discusses the ongoing phase III BELLWAVE-010 study of nemtabrutinib plus venetoclax vs venetoclax plus rituximab in previously treated patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) (Abstract TPS7089).  

Leukemia
Lymphoma

William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, on CLL/SLL: Updated Findings on Ibrutinib and Venetoclax

William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses up to 5.5 years of follow-up data from the phase II CAPTIVATE study, showing that in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), fixed duration ibrutinib plus venetoclax continues to provide clinically meaningful progression-free disease in those with high-risk genomic features as well as in the overall population (Abstract 7009).

Gynecologic Cancers

Katherine C. Fuh, MD, PhD, on Ovarian Cancer: New Data on Batiraxcept and Paclitaxel

Katherine C. Fuh, MD, PhD, of the University of California, San Francisco, discusses phase III findings of the AXLerate-OC trial, showing that batiraxcept with paclitaxel compared to paclitaxel alone improved progression-free and overall survival in patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer whose tumors were AXL-high in an exploratory analysis (LBA5515).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement