Advertisement


Anthony M. Joshua, MBBS, PhD, on Low-Risk Prostate Cancer and Metformin: New Trial Data

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Anthony M. Joshua, MBBS, PhD, of Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, discusses results from the MAST study, which explored the question of whether metformin could reduce disease progression in men with low-risk prostate cancer who are undergoing active surveillance (LBA5002).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
We designed the study back in 2012. It was a study of metformin, men with active surveillance for prostate cancer, and there was a lot of rationales as to why metformin would be useful in prostate cancer. There's laboratory studies that we've done speaking to the importance of metformin inhibiting mTOR as well as having epigenetic effects. There's data from other groups looking at the beneficial effect of metformin on the tumor microenvironment. There's epidemiological studies that suggest that diabetic men who take metformin do better for their prostate cancer treatment. There's combination studies that we've done demonstrating that, in some of the pivotal prostate cancer studies, the men who took metformin did better in the studies with abiraterone. So we put all those things together. We thought, well, metformin may be the perfect medication to give men undergoing active surveillance of prostate cancer. So from the period of 2013 to 2023, we randomised 400 men, approximately 204 on each arm to take metformin versus a matched placebo when they were undergoing active surveillance. And active surveillance is briefly, as per NCCN, very low to low risk criteria. Basically men with low volume Gleason 6 disease, and there's more details in the presentation, but those men were randomised over that period, and the endpoint was defined as either being therapeutic progression or pathological progression. The pathological progression was biopsies done at 18 and 36 months, and their therapeutic progression was any treatment for prostate cancer. And in brief, we found no difference between the arms, and in fact, there was a couple of concerning trends. One trend was that men who had a high BMI actually seemed to do worse on metformin for reasons we don't understand. And a priori, you would think those men would do better on metformin because they may lose weight, but that was not the case. And also there seemed to be a slight trend towards men progressing with higher Gleason scores who took metformin compared to those men who took placebo. This is a little bit worrying, and certainly we need to do more research to understand why this is the case. But this study was an academic study across 12 centers in Canada, funded through, essentially philanthropy, the Prostate Cancer Foundation, and the Canadian Cancer Association. So taken together, I think this has been a great academic effort. It will seed a lot of future research to understand the role of metformin and those types of drugs in men with and without diabetes for prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance.

Related Videos

Lymphoma

Joshua D. Brody, MD, on Follicular Lymphoma: New Data on Epcoritamab, Rituximab, and Lenalidomide

Joshua D. Brody, MD, of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, discusses results from the EPCORE NHL-2 study, which was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of epcoritamab-bysp plus rituximab and lenalidomide in the first-line setting for patients with follicular lymphoma and to assess epcoritamab as maintenance therapy in this population (Abstract 7014).

Lymphoma

Peter Riedell, MD, on DLBCL: Expert Commentary on the DEB Study

Peter Riedell, MD, of The University of Chicago, discusses phase III results on the use of tucidinostat plus R-CHOP in patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with double expression of MYC and BCL2. The regimen appeared to improve event-free survival and complete response rates vs R-CHOP in the front-line setting. As this is an interim analysis, longer-term follow-up will be needed to better understand its impact, says Dr. Riedell.

Breast Cancer

Milana Bergamino Sirvén, MD, PhD, on HER2-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Molecular Profiling, Prognosis, and Treatment Options

Milana Bergamino Sirvén, MD, PhD, of Spain’s Institute of Cancer Research, discusses her findings on molecular profiling of patients with estrogen receptor–positive, HER2-positive early-stage breast tumors after short-term preoperative endocrine therapy. This study suggests that such profiling may help clinicians identify those patients with a favorable prognosis for adjuvant endocrine therapy and those who may require additional treatment (Abstract 560).

Lymphoma

David J. Andorsky, MD, on DLBCL and FL: New Data on Use of Subcutaneous Epcoritamab

David J. Andorsky, MD, of the Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, discusses EPCORE NHL-6, an ongoing study of patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL). As outpatients, the study participants were given subcutaneous epcoritamab-bysp to see whether they could be safely monitored and cytokine-release syndrome appropriately managed in the outpatient setting (Abstract 7029).

Lung Cancer

Heather Wakelee, MD, on NSCLC: IMpower010 Survival Results After Long-Term Follow-up of Atezolizumab vs Best Supportive Care

Heather Wakelee, MD, of Stanford University Medical Center, discusses phase III findings showing that the disease-free survival benefit with adjuvant atezolizumab continues to translate into a positive overall survival trend vs best supportive care in patients with stage II–IIIA non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These results further support the use of adjuvant atezolizumab in PD-L1–selected populations, according to Dr. Wakelee (LBA8035).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement