Advertisement


Anthony M. Joshua, MBBS, PhD, on Low-Risk Prostate Cancer and Metformin: New Trial Data

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Anthony M. Joshua, MBBS, PhD, of Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, discusses results from the MAST study, which explored the question of whether metformin could reduce disease progression in men with low-risk prostate cancer who are undergoing active surveillance (LBA5002).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
We designed the study back in 2012. It was a study of metformin, men with active surveillance for prostate cancer, and there was a lot of rationales as to why metformin would be useful in prostate cancer. There's laboratory studies that we've done speaking to the importance of metformin inhibiting mTOR as well as having epigenetic effects. There's data from other groups looking at the beneficial effect of metformin on the tumor microenvironment. There's epidemiological studies that suggest that diabetic men who take metformin do better for their prostate cancer treatment. There's combination studies that we've done demonstrating that, in some of the pivotal prostate cancer studies, the men who took metformin did better in the studies with abiraterone. So we put all those things together. We thought, well, metformin may be the perfect medication to give men undergoing active surveillance of prostate cancer. So from the period of 2013 to 2023, we randomised 400 men, approximately 204 on each arm to take metformin versus a matched placebo when they were undergoing active surveillance. And active surveillance is briefly, as per NCCN, very low to low risk criteria. Basically men with low volume Gleason 6 disease, and there's more details in the presentation, but those men were randomised over that period, and the endpoint was defined as either being therapeutic progression or pathological progression. The pathological progression was biopsies done at 18 and 36 months, and their therapeutic progression was any treatment for prostate cancer. And in brief, we found no difference between the arms, and in fact, there was a couple of concerning trends. One trend was that men who had a high BMI actually seemed to do worse on metformin for reasons we don't understand. And a priori, you would think those men would do better on metformin because they may lose weight, but that was not the case. And also there seemed to be a slight trend towards men progressing with higher Gleason scores who took metformin compared to those men who took placebo. This is a little bit worrying, and certainly we need to do more research to understand why this is the case. But this study was an academic study across 12 centers in Canada, funded through, essentially philanthropy, the Prostate Cancer Foundation, and the Canadian Cancer Association. So taken together, I think this has been a great academic effort. It will seed a lot of future research to understand the role of metformin and those types of drugs in men with and without diabetes for prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance.

Related Videos

Lymphoma

Peter Riedell, MD, on DLBCL: Expert Commentary on the DEB Study

Peter Riedell, MD, of The University of Chicago, discusses phase III results on the use of tucidinostat plus R-CHOP in patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with double expression of MYC and BCL2. The regimen appeared to improve event-free survival and complete response rates vs R-CHOP in the front-line setting. As this is an interim analysis, longer-term follow-up will be needed to better understand its impact, says Dr. Riedell.

Bladder Cancer

Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, and Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, on Urothelial Carcinoma: Expert Commentary on Two Key Abstracts

Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, of Barts Cancer Institute and the University of London, discuss phase III findings from two studies: the first, investigating enfortumab vedotin-ejfv and pembrolizumab vs platinum-based chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer; and the second, looking at nivolumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin vs gemcitabine and cisplatin alone in patients with lymph node–only metastatic disease enrolled in the CheckMate 901 trial (Abstracts 4581 and 4565).

Lymphoma

Yasmin H. Karimi, MD, on Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Follow-up on Subcutaneous Epcoritamab Monotherapy

Yasmin H. Karimi, MD, of the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses 2.5-year follow-up data on epcoritamab monotherapy for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma. The subcutaneous regimen continues to demonstrate durable responses (Abstract 7039).

Breast Cancer

Lisa A. Carey, MD, and Dejan Juric, MD, on Breast Cancer: Updates From the INAVO120 Trial

Lisa A. Carey, MD, of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Dejan Juric, MD, of the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, discuss phase III findings on first-line use of inavolisib or placebo plus palbociclib and fulvestrant in patients with PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who relapsed within 12 months of completing adjuvant endocrine therapy (Abstract 1003).

Issues in Oncology

Andrew Srisuwananukorn, MD, and Alexander T. Pearson, MD, PhD, on Artificial Intelligence in the Clinic: Understanding How to Use This 21st Century Tool

Andrew Srisuwananukorn, MD, of The Ohio State University, and Alexander T. Pearson, MD, PhD, of the University of Chicago, discuss the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the clinic, its potential benefits in diagnosis and treatment, resources available to help physicians learn more about AI, and what’s coming for the next generation of medical school students.

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement