Advertisement


Anthony M. Joshua, MBBS, PhD, on Low-Risk Prostate Cancer and Metformin: New Trial Data

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Anthony M. Joshua, MBBS, PhD, of Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, discusses results from the MAST study, which explored the question of whether metformin could reduce disease progression in men with low-risk prostate cancer who are undergoing active surveillance (LBA5002).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
We designed the study back in 2012. It was a study of metformin, men with active surveillance for prostate cancer, and there was a lot of rationales as to why metformin would be useful in prostate cancer. There's laboratory studies that we've done speaking to the importance of metformin inhibiting mTOR as well as having epigenetic effects. There's data from other groups looking at the beneficial effect of metformin on the tumor microenvironment. There's epidemiological studies that suggest that diabetic men who take metformin do better for their prostate cancer treatment. There's combination studies that we've done demonstrating that, in some of the pivotal prostate cancer studies, the men who took metformin did better in the studies with abiraterone. So we put all those things together. We thought, well, metformin may be the perfect medication to give men undergoing active surveillance of prostate cancer. So from the period of 2013 to 2023, we randomised 400 men, approximately 204 on each arm to take metformin versus a matched placebo when they were undergoing active surveillance. And active surveillance is briefly, as per NCCN, very low to low risk criteria. Basically men with low volume Gleason 6 disease, and there's more details in the presentation, but those men were randomised over that period, and the endpoint was defined as either being therapeutic progression or pathological progression. The pathological progression was biopsies done at 18 and 36 months, and their therapeutic progression was any treatment for prostate cancer. And in brief, we found no difference between the arms, and in fact, there was a couple of concerning trends. One trend was that men who had a high BMI actually seemed to do worse on metformin for reasons we don't understand. And a priori, you would think those men would do better on metformin because they may lose weight, but that was not the case. And also there seemed to be a slight trend towards men progressing with higher Gleason scores who took metformin compared to those men who took placebo. This is a little bit worrying, and certainly we need to do more research to understand why this is the case. But this study was an academic study across 12 centers in Canada, funded through, essentially philanthropy, the Prostate Cancer Foundation, and the Canadian Cancer Association. So taken together, I think this has been a great academic effort. It will seed a lot of future research to understand the role of metformin and those types of drugs in men with and without diabetes for prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance.

Related Videos

Gynecologic Cancers

Yukio Suzuki, MD, PhD, on Endometrial Cancer: Long-Term Survival Outcomes With Hormonal Therapy in Reproductive-Age Patients

Yukio Suzuki, MD, PhD, of Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, discusses data showing that reproductive-age patients with early-stage endometrial cancer who use fertility-preserving hormonal therapy seemed to have good overall survival after a 10-year follow-up (Abstract 5508).

Leukemia
Immunotherapy

Allison M. Winter, MD, on Richter Transformation: New Data on a CAR T-Cell Treatment

Allison M. Winter, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, discusses real-world outcomes with lisocabtagene maraleucel in patients with Richter transformation, a difficult-to-treat population with a poor prognosis. Data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research showed this therapy provided clinical benefit with a high complete response rate (Abstract 7010).

Gynecologic Cancers

Don S. Dizon, MD, on Ovarian and Other Extrarenal Clear Cell Carcinomas: Update on Nivolumab and Ipilimumab

Don S. Dizon, MD, of Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University and Lifespan Cancer Institute, discusses final phase II results of the BrUOG 354 trial showing that, for patients with ovarian and other extrarenal clear cell cancers, nivolumab and ipilimumab warrant further evaluation against standard treatment, given the historically chemotherapy-resistant nature of the disease (LBA5500).

Leukemia
Lymphoma

William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, on CLL/SLL: Updated Findings on Ibrutinib and Venetoclax

William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses up to 5.5 years of follow-up data from the phase II CAPTIVATE study, showing that in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), fixed duration ibrutinib plus venetoclax continues to provide clinically meaningful progression-free disease in those with high-risk genomic features as well as in the overall population (Abstract 7009).

Skin Cancer

Christian U. Blank, MD, PhD, on Melanoma: Potentially Practice-Changing Results From the NADINA Trial

Christian U. Blank, MD, PhD, of the Netherlands Cancer Institute, discusses findings of an investigator-initiated phase III trial showing that neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab followed by response-driven adjuvant treatment improved event-free survival in patients with macroscopic, resectable stage III melanoma compared with adjuvant nivolumab (LBA2)

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement