Advertisement


Stephen M. Ansell, MD, PhD, and Patrizia Mondello, MD, PhD: New Findings on How the IRF4 Gene Shapes Tumor Immunity in Follicular Lymphoma

2022 ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition

Advertisement

Stephen M. Ansell, MD, PhD, and Patrizia Mondello, MD, PhD, both of the Mayo Clinic, discuss the 20% of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) who relapse early and experience a poor prognosis. The researchers found that FLs with high levels of IRF4 expression are associated with a suppressive tumor microenvironment, and selective IRF4 silencing restores antilymphoma T-cell immunity. Further investigation is warranted to identify the mechanisms by which IRF4 controls tumor immunity to develop precision therapies for this population (Abstract 70).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Stephen M.Ansell: Dr. Mondella, that was a great abstract, really appreciated what you had to say about IRF4 in follicular lymphoma. I was really interested and curious: why did you pick IRF4? What do we know about it, and why would that be important in follicular lymphoma? Patrizia Mondella: That is a fantastic question. The point here is we perform a [inaudible 00:00:27] studies that identify the A cluster with particular relevance of R four and poor prognosis and two microenvironment. The problem is there is not so much known about R four as interact with the tumor micro environment and we wanted to understand how it's possible that the B cells may reprogram the tumor micro environment. So for this reason, we assessed whether the R Four expression could be associated with the batter or a worse tumor micro environment. And we further dissect with the different bioinformatics analysis to evaluate first of all, which are the mono population more frequently associated with R four high or low expression. And we indeed define how I R four expression was associated with higher deregulatory cells, higher CD 40 cells and we also further identify the immuno phenotype that was exhausted and we then try to do some in vitro experiment and identify that if we have or we don't have R four, we can modulate costimulatory receptor of the B cells that then can be one of the counterpart that can influence the tumor microenvironment. But also the cytokines that are released from cells, they may or may not expressor report they can further influence the tumor microenvironment. Stephen M.Ansell: And you showed some really interesting information about certain receptor ligand pairs that change and that go up and down based on IRF4. Tell me a little bit more about exactly what you showed. Patrizia Mondella: Yeah, see what I was referring about costimulatory receptors is more fertilizer to the CD 40 expression that engage the IRF4 haler cells and the PDL one expression. So while left CD 40 was down regulated in R four high, the PDL one was up regulated and PDL one is more inhibitory. So we identify how R four is controlling the expression of this receptors and the indeed that can influence the tumor macro environment. Stephen M.Ansell: And this actually impacts not all of follicular lymphoma but a subset. So about how many, what percentage of follicular lymphoma is this a relevant mechanism? Patrizia Mondella: So as now we have identified something about a 20 or something more percent of the tumor analyze the problem is that we need to further expand our investigation in order to make a better statement. And the more interesting finding is that what we have identified at the bioinformatics level was also translated in [inaudible 00:03:16] chemistry level. And this isn't interesting because our IRF4 is currently not assessed in the normal panel that is used for follicular lymphoma. And we believe this should be actually add in order to evaluate the prognosis of the patients. But again, we have fundings that were done in a small subset and currently as you know, we are going to expand further these identification in order to make a better statement. Stephen M.Ansell: And clearly this is an important finding because it's an opportunity to modulate something, to change something that could in a bad prognosis group result in a better outcome. So how do you think we might be able to target, are we going to go after IRF4?, are we going to go off to CD 40? Or We going to go off to PD-l? What do you think? Patrizia Mondella: This is an excellent question. So first of all, one of the most important part is that IRF4 is not only expressing focal lymphoma, but we have to remember that is expressed in many other [inaudible 00:04:14] lymphoma. We need to think about that IR F4 is a prognostic also in aggressive B-cell lymphoma. I believe that there is a room for target therapy against IRF4 and we really need to better understand how to target IRF4 since it's a transcription factor. So probably a product drug might be the way to go. But it's also interesting because our four reactive antigen presentation, so it might be using combination with other immunotherapy components or can be also used to in combination with CART-cell therapy. So probably this is an exciting field that should be further expanded. Stephen M.Ansell: Yeah, really exciting field. So thank you. That's exceedingly interesting and again, I look forward to where this goes with the next iteration and maybe targeted therapies in the future. Patrizia Mondella: Thanks so much. Stephen M.Ansell: Thank you.

Related Videos

Multiple Myeloma
Immunotherapy

Eileen M. Boyle, MD, PhD, on Multiple Myeloma: Sustained MRD Negativity in Newly Diagnosed Disease Treated with Immunotherapy Regimens

Eileen M. Boyle, MD, PhD, of the Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, discusses Fc-mediated antibody effector function, inflammation resolution, and oligoclonality and their role in predicting sustained measurable residual disease negativity in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were treated with immunotherapy regimens. For the first time, an analysis of T-cell receptors shows that oligoclonal profiles seen on treatment may influence the fitness of the immune response (Abstract 100).

Multiple Myeloma

Paul G. Richardson, MD, on Multiple Myeloma: Mezigdomide Plus Dexamethasone in Relapsed and Refractory Disease

Paul G. Richardson, MD, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses preliminary results from the dose-expansion phase of the CC-92480-MM-001 Trial, which showed promising efficacy in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, including those with prior BCMA-targeted therapies. Patients in these two groups had an overall response rate of 40% and 50%, respectively. The results support the development of mezigdomide, currently being evaluated in combination with standard therapies in multiple myeloma as part of a large, ongoing phase I/II trial (NCT03989414) and planned phase III studies (Abstract 568).

Multiple Myeloma

Julie Côté, MD, on Multiple Myeloma: Real-World Results of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Newly Diagnosed Patients

Julie Côté, MD, of CHU de Québec–Université Laval, discusses findings from the Canadian Myeloma Research Group database, which showed that integrating bortezomib and lenalidomide into the autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) sequence produces a median overall survival rate ≥ 10 years in most patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. These observations highlight the contribution of post-ASCT maintenance, particularly lenalidomide given until disease progression, when used in multiple patient groups including those with and without high risk, as well as those requiring a second induction regimen (Abstract 117).

Leukemia

Jorge E. Cortes, MD, on CML: Efficacy and Safety of Vodobatinib

Jorge E. Cortes, MD, of Georgia Cancer Center at Augusta University, discusses new findings on vodobatinib, which was administered to patients with chronic-phase Philadelphia chromosome–positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and appeared to be efficacious and safe in people who had received therapy with two or three prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Vodobatinib remains a potential option for these highly refractory patients. A phase II study (NCT02629692) of vodobatinib is ongoing in CML patients whose disease has failed to respond to three or more TKIs, including ponatinib (Abstract 84).

Lymphoma

Jia Ruan, MD, PhD, on Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Phase II Findings on Acalabrutinib/Lenalidomide/Rituximab

Jia Ruan, MD, PhD, of Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, and NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, discusses trial results demonstrating that the triple chemotherapy-free combination of acalabrutinib, lenalidomide, and rituximab is well tolerated, highly effective, and produces high rates of minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete response as an initial treatment for patients with mantle cell lymphoma, including those with TP53 mutations. Real-time MRD analysis may enable treatment de-escalation during maintenance to minimize toxicity, which warrants further evaluation. An expansion cohort of acalabrutinib/lenalidomide/obinutuzumab is being launched (Abstract 73).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement