Advertisement


Tomohiro Aoki, MD, PhD, on the Spatial Tumor Microenvironment and Outcome of Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma

2022 ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition

Advertisement

Tomohiro Aoki, MD, PhD, of the University of British Columbia and the Centre for Lymphoid Cancer at BC Cancer, discusses a novel prognostic model applicable to patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma who were treated with autologous stem cell transplantation. The model has shown the interaction between the biomarker CXCR5 on HRS cells (Hodgkin and Reed/Sternberg cells, hallmarks of Hodgkin lymphoma) with specific follicular T helper cells and macrophages, a prominent crosstalk axis in relapsed disease. This insight opens new avenues to developing predictive biomarkers (Abstract 71).

 



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Development of the spatially informed biomarker, that is the main goal of our study. Our study here is focusing on relapsed refractory Hodgkin lymphoma because, as you know, despite the recent treatment advancements, still about 20 to 30% of patients experience relapsed disease, and about half of them eventually succumb to their disease. Importantly, there's no biomarker we can utilize in daily clinical practice setting yet. So, our study goals are describing the tumor microbiome ecosystem for the relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma and develop some novel prognostic model for relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma. For these goals, we applied imaging mass cytometry, which enabled us to visualize more than 37 protein marker in the spatial context, and we applied IMC using the unique cohorts, which consist of 73 paired diagnostic and relapsed biopsy of Hodgkin lymphoma. Primary advantage of the imaging mass cytometry data is that we can capture the complex spatial information at single cell resolutions. To capture the complex information, we established the pipeline called spatial score, so that we can utilize the information for the biomarker development. First, we describe the unique contrast between early relapsed biopsy and relapse biopsy. In brief, we identified that early relapsed biopsy, in general, shares micro-environment patterns between diagnostic and relapsed biopsy. In contrast, where relapsed biopsy shows the significant difference between diagnostic and relapsed biopsies. Next, we sought to develop the micro-environments best prognostic model, using the spatial information. So first, using the best model and using amazing math rudimentary data, we identified the four variables which is significantly associated with the outcome in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma which includes CXCR5 positive HRS cells, CD4 positive T cells, macrophage and CXCR5 positive B cell population. Using those four variables, we have developed a novel prognostic model called RHL4S, which produced highly significant [inaudible 00:02:50] group in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma, in harmony, treated with high dose chemotherapy, followed by stem cell transplantation. We further identified the unique micro-environment patterns of the six certified positive HRS cells, which are spatially arranged together and form cell clusters. Their unique interactions with the six certified positive initial population, including macrophage and T cells. In summary, we have developed a novel prognostic model in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma and importantly, we have now opened up a new avenue of spatially informed biomarker. I believe that this new concept can be applicable to any of the cancer types, not limited to Hodgkin lymphoma. Now, we are verifying our findings and our ultimate goal is we can utilize those spatially informed biomarker in the daily clinical practice setting. Now we are translating our IMC data findings into the managed IT settings so that we can utilize the information into the daily clinical practice.

Related Videos

Hematologic Malignancies
Genomics/Genetics

Smita Bhatia, MD, MPH: Some Clonal Mutations May Predict Therapy-Related Myeloid Neoplasms

Smita Bhatia, MD, MPH, of the Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, discusses study findings that showed key somatic mutations in the peripheral blood stem cell product increases the risk of developing therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (Abstract 119).

Leukemia

Andrew Matthews, MD, on AML: Real-World Effectiveness of 7 + 3 Intensive Chemotherapy vs Venetoclax and a Hypomethylating Agent

Andrew Matthews, MD, of the Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, discusses findings from a large, multicenter study that showed superior outcomes with 7 + 3 chemotherapy (cytarabine continuously for 7 days, along with short infusions of an anthracycline on each of the first 3 days) vs venetoclax in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this real-world data set, the 7 + 3 cohort outperformed historical benchmarks in overall survival and early mortality, perhaps reflecting improved later lines of therapy and patient selection. Prospective studies (such as NCT04801797) must confirm the superiority of intensive chemotherapy (Abstract 426).

 

Lymphoma

Jia Ruan, MD, PhD, on Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Phase II Findings on Acalabrutinib/Lenalidomide/Rituximab

Jia Ruan, MD, PhD, of Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, and NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, discusses trial results demonstrating that the triple chemotherapy-free combination of acalabrutinib, lenalidomide, and rituximab is well tolerated, highly effective, and produces high rates of minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete response as an initial treatment for patients with mantle cell lymphoma, including those with TP53 mutations. Real-time MRD analysis may enable treatment de-escalation during maintenance to minimize toxicity, which warrants further evaluation. An expansion cohort of acalabrutinib/lenalidomide/obinutuzumab is being launched (Abstract 73).

Leukemia
Lymphoma

Jennifer R. Brown, MD, PhD, on CLL/SLL: New Findings on Zanubrutinib vs Ibrutinib for Relapsed or Refractory Disease

Jennifer R. Brown, MD, PhD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses phase III findings of the ALPINE study, which showed that zanubrutinib is more efficacious and better tolerated than ibrutinib as a treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). In this first head-to-head comparison of the two BTK inhibitors, the superior progression-free survival of zanubrutinib was observed across all major subgroups, including high-risk patients (Abstract LBA-6).

Multiple Myeloma

Julie Côté, MD, on Multiple Myeloma: Real-World Results of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Newly Diagnosed Patients

Julie Côté, MD, of CHU de Québec–Université Laval, discusses findings from the Canadian Myeloma Research Group database, which showed that integrating bortezomib and lenalidomide into the autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) sequence produces a median overall survival rate ≥ 10 years in most patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. These observations highlight the contribution of post-ASCT maintenance, particularly lenalidomide given until disease progression, when used in multiple patient groups including those with and without high risk, as well as those requiring a second induction regimen (Abstract 117).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement