Advertisement


Eunice S. Wang, MD, on AML: Long-Term Results With Crenolanib Plus Chemotherapy

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Eunice S. Wang, MD, of Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses long-term phase II findings of a trial evaluating crenolanib plus chemotherapy in newly diagnosed adults with FLT3-mutant acute myeloid leukemia. The study showed a composite complete remission rate of 86%. With a median follow-up of 45 months, median overall survival has not been reached. A phase III trial is ongoing (Abstract 7007).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
We designed a phase II clinical trial evaluating crenolanib added to standard 7+3 intensive chemotherapy for adults with newly diagnosed FLT3 AML. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of adding this novel FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor to standard intensive chemotherapy based on prior results of single agent crenolanib activity in heavily pretreated relapse and refractory FLT3 mutant adult patients. Crenolanib is a pan-FLT3 inhibitor with activity against both the active and inactive formations of FLT3 and has activity against both FLT3, ITD, and TKD mutations. We designed this study to combine it with intensive chemotherapy, for which the standard of care is currently midostaurin plus 7+3 chemotherapy. A total of 44 patients were enrolled on this study, 29 younger than equal to 60 years of age, and 15 older than 60 years of age. 91% of patients had de novo disease, 75% with FLT3 ITD mutations and 18% with TKD mutations. Overall, patients were enrolled in standard intensive therapy with physicians choice of anthracycline, daunorubicin, or idarubicin plus infusional cytarabine for 7 days, followed by crenolanib started at 24 to 48 hours after chemotherapy and continued until 72 hours prior to next chemotherapy cycle. Patients were allowed to get consolidation with high-dose cytarabine or go on to transplantation, followed by 12 months of maintenance crenolanib following either chemo or transplant. The overall remission rate in this trial was 86%. Younger patients younger than are equal to 60 years of age had a CR/CRI rate of 90%, and individual's greater than or equal to 60 years of age had an overall response rate of 80%. At 45 months of long-term follow up, the event-free survival for all 44 patients enrolled in this trial was 45 months. The median overall survival was not reached. In younger patients younger than 60 years of age, the median overall survival was not reached, with 71% of patients alive at 3 years after enrollment on this study. The overall cumulative rate of relapse in patients was 33%, and 15% in patients younger than 60. Of note, patients undergoing transplantation in this younger cohort had similar cumulative rate of relapse than patients getting chemotherapy alone. In conclusion, we think that this combination regimen shows high efficacy, safety, and tolerability as compared to standard 7+3 plus midostaurin. A phase III trial of this combination approach is currently accruing using midostaurin 7+3 as its control arm. Results of this trial are eagerly awaited.

Related Videos

Multiple Myeloma

Paul G. Richardson, MD, on Multiple Myeloma: New Data on Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone, With or Without ASCT

Paul G. Richardson, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses phase III findings from the DETERMINATION trial, which showed that, for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) with or without autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and lenalidomide maintenance to disease progression resulted in the longest median progression-free survival reported for each approach, and a highly significant difference in progression-free survival in favor of early transplant. While overall response rates were similar, rates of MRD favored early transplant also, but toxicity was greater and quality of life was transiently but significantly diminished. No overall survival advantage has been observed to date (Abstract LBA4).

Gynecologic Cancers
Immunotherapy

Ursula A. Matulonis, MD, and Ignace Vergote, MD, PhD, on Cervical Cancer: Interim Results on Tisotumab Vedotin-tftv Plus Pembrolizumab

Ursula A. Matulonis, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Ignace Vergote, MD, PhD, of Belgium’s University Hospitals Leuven, discuss interim safety and efficacy results from a third dose-expansion cohort evaluating first-line tisotumab vedotin-tftv plus pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. Data on the combination showed durable antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile (Abstract 5507).

Breast Cancer

Etienne Brain, MD, PhD, on Breast Cancer: Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy With or Without Chemotherapy in Older Patients

Etienne Brain, MD, PhD, of the Institut Curie, discusses phase III findings from the Unicancer ASTER 70s trial, in which patients aged 70 or older with estrogen receptor–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer and a high genomic grade index received adjuvant endocrine therapy with or without chemotherapy. The data did not find a statistically significant overall survival benefit with this treatment after surgery (Abstract 500).

Lymphoma

Andrew D. Zelenetz, MD, PhD, and Michael L. Wang, MD, on Mantle Cell Lymphoma: New Data on Ibrutinib in Combination With Bendamustine/Rituximab and Rituximab Maintenance

Andrew D. Zelenetz, MD, PhD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Michael L. Wang, MD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discuss primary results from the phase III SHINE study, which showed that ibrutinib, in combination with bendamustine/rituximab and rituximab maintenance, may set a new benchmark for patients aged 65 or older with mantle cell lymphoma. With a median progression-free survival of 6.7 years, the ibrutinib combination is more beneficial than currently used chemoimmunotherapy (approximately 1.5–3.5 years) (Abstract LBA7502).

COVID-19

Jenny S. Guadamuz, PhD, on Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Telemedicine Use Among U.S. Patients With Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Jenny S. Guadamuz, PhD, of Flatiron Health, discusses the use of telemedicine services in community oncology clinics for patients initiating treatments for 21 common cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Black, uninsured, non-urban, and less affluent patients were less likely to use telemedicine services. Although telemedicine may expand access to specialty care, the proliferation of these services may widen cancer care disparities if equitable access to these services is not ensured, according to Dr. Guadamuz (Abstract 6511).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement