Advertisement


Eunice S. Wang, MD, on AML: Long-Term Results With Crenolanib Plus Chemotherapy

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Eunice S. Wang, MD, of Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses long-term phase II findings of a trial evaluating crenolanib plus chemotherapy in newly diagnosed adults with FLT3-mutant acute myeloid leukemia. The study showed a composite complete remission rate of 86%. With a median follow-up of 45 months, median overall survival has not been reached. A phase III trial is ongoing (Abstract 7007).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
We designed a phase II clinical trial evaluating crenolanib added to standard 7+3 intensive chemotherapy for adults with newly diagnosed FLT3 AML. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of adding this novel FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor to standard intensive chemotherapy based on prior results of single agent crenolanib activity in heavily pretreated relapse and refractory FLT3 mutant adult patients. Crenolanib is a pan-FLT3 inhibitor with activity against both the active and inactive formations of FLT3 and has activity against both FLT3, ITD, and TKD mutations. We designed this study to combine it with intensive chemotherapy, for which the standard of care is currently midostaurin plus 7+3 chemotherapy. A total of 44 patients were enrolled on this study, 29 younger than equal to 60 years of age, and 15 older than 60 years of age. 91% of patients had de novo disease, 75% with FLT3 ITD mutations and 18% with TKD mutations. Overall, patients were enrolled in standard intensive therapy with physicians choice of anthracycline, daunorubicin, or idarubicin plus infusional cytarabine for 7 days, followed by crenolanib started at 24 to 48 hours after chemotherapy and continued until 72 hours prior to next chemotherapy cycle. Patients were allowed to get consolidation with high-dose cytarabine or go on to transplantation, followed by 12 months of maintenance crenolanib following either chemo or transplant. The overall remission rate in this trial was 86%. Younger patients younger than are equal to 60 years of age had a CR/CRI rate of 90%, and individual's greater than or equal to 60 years of age had an overall response rate of 80%. At 45 months of long-term follow up, the event-free survival for all 44 patients enrolled in this trial was 45 months. The median overall survival was not reached. In younger patients younger than 60 years of age, the median overall survival was not reached, with 71% of patients alive at 3 years after enrollment on this study. The overall cumulative rate of relapse in patients was 33%, and 15% in patients younger than 60. Of note, patients undergoing transplantation in this younger cohort had similar cumulative rate of relapse than patients getting chemotherapy alone. In conclusion, we think that this combination regimen shows high efficacy, safety, and tolerability as compared to standard 7+3 plus midostaurin. A phase III trial of this combination approach is currently accruing using midostaurin 7+3 as its control arm. Results of this trial are eagerly awaited.

Related Videos

Pancreatic Cancer

Alfredo Carrato, MD, PhD, on Pancreatic Cancer: Nab-Paclitaxel, Gemcitabine, and FOLFOX for Metastatic Disease

Alfredo Carrato, MD, PhD, of Alcala de Henares University in Spain, discusses phase II results from the SEQUENCE trial, which showed that nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and modified FOLFOX showed significantly higher clinical activity than the standard nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in the first-line setting of patients with untreated metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (Abstract 4022).

Lung Cancer
Immunotherapy

Gilberto de Lima Lopes, Jr, MD, MBA, and Oladimeji Akinboro, MD, MPH, on NSCLC: Outcomes of Anti–PD-(L)1 Therapy With or Without Chemotherapy in the First-Line Setting

Gilberto de Lima Lopes, Jr, MD, MBA, of Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Miami, and Oladimeji Akinboro, MD, MPH, of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), discuss a data analysis, which suggests that most subgroups of patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer with a PD-L1 score of 50% or greater who are receiving FDA-approved chemotherapy/immunotherapy regimens may have overall survival outcomes comparable to or better than immunotherapy-alone regimens (Abstract 9000).

Pancreatic Cancer

Pamela L. Kunz, MD, on Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Final Analysis of Temozolomide or Temozolomide Plus Capecitabine

Pamela L. Kunz, MD, of the Yale University School of Medicine, discusses new findings from the ECOG-ACRIN E2211 trial, which showed the longest progression-free survival and highest response rates with temozolomide plus capecitabine reported to date for patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The presence of a deficiency of MGMT, the drug-resistance gene, was associated with greater odds of an objective response (Abstract 4004).

Bladder Cancer

Sumanta K. Pal, MD, on Urothelial Carcinoma: New Results on Cabozantinib Plus Atezolizumab

Sumanta K. Pal, MD, of City of Hope National Medical Center, discusses findings from the COSMIC-021 study, which showed that cabozantinib plus atezolizumab demonstrated encouraging clinical activity with manageable toxicity in patients with inoperable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. The combination was administered as first-line therapy in cisplatin-based chemotherapy–eligible and –ineligible patients and as second- or later-line treatment in those who received prior immune checkpoint inhibitors (Abstract 4504).

COVID-19

Jenny S. Guadamuz, PhD, on Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Telemedicine Use Among U.S. Patients With Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Jenny S. Guadamuz, PhD, of Flatiron Health, discusses the use of telemedicine services in community oncology clinics for patients initiating treatments for 21 common cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Black, uninsured, non-urban, and less affluent patients were less likely to use telemedicine services. Although telemedicine may expand access to specialty care, the proliferation of these services may widen cancer care disparities if equitable access to these services is not ensured, according to Dr. Guadamuz (Abstract 6511).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement