Advertisement


Eunice S. Wang, MD, on AML: Long-Term Results With Crenolanib Plus Chemotherapy

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Eunice S. Wang, MD, of Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses long-term phase II findings of a trial evaluating crenolanib plus chemotherapy in newly diagnosed adults with FLT3-mutant acute myeloid leukemia. The study showed a composite complete remission rate of 86%. With a median follow-up of 45 months, median overall survival has not been reached. A phase III trial is ongoing (Abstract 7007).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
We designed a phase II clinical trial evaluating crenolanib added to standard 7+3 intensive chemotherapy for adults with newly diagnosed FLT3 AML. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of adding this novel FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor to standard intensive chemotherapy based on prior results of single agent crenolanib activity in heavily pretreated relapse and refractory FLT3 mutant adult patients. Crenolanib is a pan-FLT3 inhibitor with activity against both the active and inactive formations of FLT3 and has activity against both FLT3, ITD, and TKD mutations. We designed this study to combine it with intensive chemotherapy, for which the standard of care is currently midostaurin plus 7+3 chemotherapy. A total of 44 patients were enrolled on this study, 29 younger than equal to 60 years of age, and 15 older than 60 years of age. 91% of patients had de novo disease, 75% with FLT3 ITD mutations and 18% with TKD mutations. Overall, patients were enrolled in standard intensive therapy with physicians choice of anthracycline, daunorubicin, or idarubicin plus infusional cytarabine for 7 days, followed by crenolanib started at 24 to 48 hours after chemotherapy and continued until 72 hours prior to next chemotherapy cycle. Patients were allowed to get consolidation with high-dose cytarabine or go on to transplantation, followed by 12 months of maintenance crenolanib following either chemo or transplant. The overall remission rate in this trial was 86%. Younger patients younger than are equal to 60 years of age had a CR/CRI rate of 90%, and individual's greater than or equal to 60 years of age had an overall response rate of 80%. At 45 months of long-term follow up, the event-free survival for all 44 patients enrolled in this trial was 45 months. The median overall survival was not reached. In younger patients younger than 60 years of age, the median overall survival was not reached, with 71% of patients alive at 3 years after enrollment on this study. The overall cumulative rate of relapse in patients was 33%, and 15% in patients younger than 60. Of note, patients undergoing transplantation in this younger cohort had similar cumulative rate of relapse than patients getting chemotherapy alone. In conclusion, we think that this combination regimen shows high efficacy, safety, and tolerability as compared to standard 7+3 plus midostaurin. A phase III trial of this combination approach is currently accruing using midostaurin 7+3 as its control arm. Results of this trial are eagerly awaited.

Related Videos

Leukemia

Courtney D. DiNardo, MD, MSCE, and Stéphane de Botton, MD, PhD, on AML: New Data on IDH2-Mutant Alleles, Enasidenib, and Conventional Care

Courtney D. DiNardo, MD, MSCE, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, and Stéphane de Botton, MD, PhD, of Institut Gustave Roussy, discuss phase III findings from the IDHENTIFY trial, which showed that mutational burden and co-mutational profiles differed between patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia that exhibited IDH2-R140 and IDH2-R172 mutations. Enasidenib improved survival outcomes for patients with IDH2-R172 mutations: median overall survival and 1-year survival rates were approximately double those in the conventional care arm (Abstract 7005).

Lung Cancer

Apar Kishor Ganti, MD, on SCLC: Comparing Quality of Life With Once- and Twice-Daily Thoracic Radiotherapy

Apar Kishor Ganti, MD, of the University of Nebraska Medical Center, discusses results from the CALGB 30610 study, which showed a similar clinical benefit for once- and twice-daily radiotherapy administered to patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer. While both regimens were well tolerated, patients who received radiotherapy once daily had better quality-of-life scores at week 3 and slightly worse scores at week 12. Patients believed the once-daily regimen was more convenient (Abstract 8504).

Head and Neck Cancer

Sue S. Yom, MD, PhD, on Oropharyngeal Cancer and the Feasibility of a Cell-Free DNA Plasma Assay

Sue S. Yom, MD, PhD, of the University of California, San Francisco, discusses a translational analysis from the NRG-HN002 study. This phase II trial established the feasibility of the tumor tissue–modified viral (TTMV) human papillomavirus DNA assay in clinical trial specimens. The goal is to use such an assay to measure tumor volume, levels of TTMV over the course of treatment, and the association of TTMV to treatment outcomes (Abstract 6006).

 

Bladder Cancer

Karim Chamie, MD, on Bladder Cancer: Final Results on N-803 and Bacillus Calmette-Guérin

Karim Chamie, MD, of the University of California, Los Angeles, discusses final clinical results on combining the superagonist N-803 with bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) in patients whose carcinoma in situ and high-grade non–muscle-invasive bladder cancers are unresponsive to BCG alone. Of note, cystectomy was avoided in more than 90% of patients with 2 years of follow-up (Abstract 4508).

Breast Cancer

Nancy Davidson, MD: In It for the Long Haul: Outcomes in Hormone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer

Nancy Davidson, MD, of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, reviews results from four abstracts about the importance of long-term follow-up in studies of adjuvant endocrine therapy for hormone receptor–positive breast cancer. Because the natural history of hormone receptor–positive breast cancer is long, an effort is underway to improve selection of patients by clinical parameters or biomarkers, refine the endocrine therapy background, and administer more effective combinations of endocrine therapy with other agents.

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement