Advertisement


Georgina V. Long, MD, PhD, on Melanoma: New Data on Pembrolizumab, Dabrafenib, and Trametinib

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Georgina V. Long, MD, PhD, of the Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, discusses findings from the NeoTrio trial on neoadjuvant pembrolizumab alone, in sequence with, or concurrent with dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with resectable BRAF-mutant stage III melanoma. The study may help clinicians determine the optimal combination of therapy (Abstract 9503).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The NeoTrio trial is one of the many neoadjuvant trials that we are now conducting in melanoma, in Resectable Stage III Melanoma. It is the most wonderful platform. Not only do we rapidly assess the efficacy of drug therapies, cutting drug development time from over two years to six months but we also get wonderful translational tumor tissue to then understand resistance, because this is the greatest unmet need in melanoma. So the NeoTrio trial was a neoadjuvant trial conducted in stage three resected melanoma. Patients were randomized to three different arms. The hypothesis in this trial was how do we best combine BRAF and MEK targeted therapy with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy? Should we give them all three together? Can we get away with just giving a little bit of the targeted therapy in sequence with the anti-PD-1? And this rationale is because we know that BRAF and MEK inhibitors bring in lots of T cells within one week of starting treatment. And then the third arm was a control arm of anti-PD-1 alone. We have previously conducted a neoadjuvant trial with just targeted therapy and that was the NeoCombi trial previously published in The Lancet Oncology, which forms the second control arm. So in this three arm trial, we saw that the complete pathological response rate was very different in the three arms. For the triple therapy of all three drugs together, it was 50% with the major pathological response rate of 55%. The major pathological response is the complete response plus the near complete response. For the sequencing arm, we did not see such a high level of pathological response and it was 15% for complete pathological response and 30% for major pathological response. For the PD-1 alone arm, we soar a 30% complete pathological response rate and a 40% major pathological response rate. So in summary for the pathological response, we saw the highest rate within the triple therapy arm and the lowest rate within the sequencing arm, which was unlikely to be any different from the PD-1 alone arm. In terms of the number of patients that were 20 patients in each arm because this is mainly a translational signal finding neoadjuvant trial. Now what's really important is the quality of these pathological response rates from a pooled analysis that we published in Nature Medicine, first author Alex Menzies, we saw that when you had a pathological response with immunotherapy, we saw a sustained relapse free survival benefit, almost a flat lining of the relapse free survival patients rarely recurred. With targeted therapy however, we see that if you have a pathological response, you can indeed recur. Although complete pathological responders do well with just targeted therapy, they still can recur unlike immunotherapy. Now, what we saw in this trial was that although we saw a higher pathological response rate with the triple therapy patients could recur. In fact, already we've had one recurrence from the major pathological responders and we've had no recurrences in the major pathological responses with PD-1 alone. So in short, this trial showed that sandwiching or sequencing the BRAF/MEK, did not provide that extra activity with the PD-1 that we were hoping for. And that in fact, immunotherapy still confers the greatest benefit in terms of correlating the relapse-free survival with the pathological response. We also saw significant toxicity with the triple therapy particularly pyrexia, driven by the Dabrafenib and Trametinib and enhanced by the PD-1, anti-PD-1 pembrolizumab. And we also saw many patients have to cease the BRAF and MEK inhibitor Dabrafenib and Trametinib during the neoadjuvant phase. The take home message is that giving a little bit of BRAF/MEK inhibitor before your PD-1 does really not change the long term outcome. Leveraging that T-cell infiltrate that BRAF and MEK inhibitors give, cannot be done in this way. And it's probably a nonspecific T-cell infiltrate that we see.

Related Videos

COVID-19

Jenny S. Guadamuz, PhD, on Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Telemedicine Use Among U.S. Patients With Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Jenny S. Guadamuz, PhD, of Flatiron Health, discusses the use of telemedicine services in community oncology clinics for patients initiating treatments for 21 common cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Black, uninsured, non-urban, and less affluent patients were less likely to use telemedicine services. Although telemedicine may expand access to specialty care, the proliferation of these services may widen cancer care disparities if equitable access to these services is not ensured, according to Dr. Guadamuz (Abstract 6511).

Issues in Oncology
Global Cancer Care

Clifford A. Hudis, MD, and Karen E. Knudsen, PhD, MBA, on How ASCO and the American Cancer Society Are Collaborating to Help Patients With Cancer

Clifford A. Hudis, MD, of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, and Karen E. Knudsen, PhD, MBA, of the American Cancer Society, discuss their collaboration, pooling their research and education resources to help empower patients with cancer and their families. Within 48 hours, Drs. Hudis and Knudsen were able to gear up a rapid response to the crisis in Ukraine, forming a clinical corps of volunteers to post information online in multiple languages, which helped patients navigate their care in the war-torn region. To date, 300 European cancer organizations have joined their efforts.

Leukemia

Eunice S. Wang, MD, on AML: Long-Term Results With Crenolanib Plus Chemotherapy

Eunice S. Wang, MD, of Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses long-term phase II findings of a trial evaluating crenolanib plus chemotherapy in newly diagnosed adults with FLT3-mutant acute myeloid leukemia. The study showed a composite complete remission rate of 86%. With a median follow-up of 45 months, median overall survival has not been reached. A phase III trial is ongoing (Abstract 7007).

Prostate Cancer

Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, and Ian D. Davis, PhD, MBBS, on Prostate Cancer: Updated Overall Survival Outcomes With Enzalutamide

Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Ian D. Davis, PhD, MBBS, of Monash University and Eastern Health, discuss the latest findings from ANZUP Cancer Trials Group’s ENZAMET cooperative group trial of enzalutamide in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. The results corroborate the benefit of enzalutamide with improved overall survival, and involve some exploratory subgroup analyses (Abstract LBA5004).

Bladder Cancer
Immunotherapy

Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, on Urothelial Carcinoma: Long-Term Outcomes With Enfortumab Vedotin-ejfv vs Chemotherapy

Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, of Barts Health NHS Trust, Queen Mary University of London, and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, discuss the 24-month findings from the phase III EV-301 trial, which suggest that enfortumab vedotin-ejfv continues to show a significant and consistent survival advantage over standard chemotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced urothelial carcinoma (Abstract 4516).

Advertisement

Advertisement



Advertisement