Antonio Marra, MD, on Metastatic Breast Cancer: Patterns of Genomic Instability and Their Effect on Treatment

ESMO Congress 2022


Antonio Marra, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, discusses a mutational signature analysis that reveals patterns of genomic instability linked to resistance to endocrine therapy with or without CDK4/6 inhibition in patients with estrogen receptor–positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (Abstract 210O).


Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The study we presented at this meeting was focused on the mutational signature analysis of breast cancers. We used the genomic data collected from a clinical sequencing program at Memorial Sloan Kettering, and we studied over 4,000 breast cancer, studying mutational signatures, that are mutational processes that shape the genomes of this cancer. In breast cancer, we have three main mutational processes and mutational signatures that are HRD, APOBEC, and clock. Our work will mainly focus on APOBEC and HRD that are the two main mutational signatures that cause genomic instability. We firstly try to identify which are the main settings where these signatures are rich, and we find that both HRD and APOBEC are rich in the metastatic samples of the ER-positive HER2-negative subtype. We then evaluated the clinical and pathologic features of these tumors, and we found the enrichment for specific pattern including lobular phenotype and tumor with high tumor mutational burden. From a treatment perspective, we then evaluated the role of the signature on the response to specific treatments and we found something really interesting, because these two signature were both associated with a lower progression-free survival for patient treated on first-line with endocrine therapy with or without CDK4/6 inhibitor, suggesting that genomic instability caused by these two mutation processes is associated with the reduced benefit from standard treatments. We then focus the last part of our work on studying the genomic mechanism of APOBEC mutagenesis in breast cancer and we found some very strong genetic association including enrichment for variant-specific genes like CDH1, PIK3CA, and most importantly also, some genes are associated with endocrine-resistance like NF1 or PTEN. We finally did a very strong analysis on the association within PIK3CA variants and APOBEC mutagenesis found a specific region in tumors that have multiple PIK3CA mutations and this may have some clinical indication considering that breast cancer with multiple PIK3CA mutations seems to have a better response to PIK3C-alpha-selective inhibition. In conclusion, our study shows that genomic stability is a marker of lower benefit on endocrine therapy and CDK4/6 inhibition, and most importantly, we may have in the future new treatment targeting this mutational process that can open to advancement in treatments and open new opportunities for our patients.

Related Videos

Gynecologic Cancers

Ana Oaknin, MD, PhD, on Cervical Cancer: Safety and Efficacy Results With Nivolumab and Ipilimumab

Ana Oaknin, MD, PhD, of Barcelona’s Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, discusses findings from the CheckMate 358 trial, which showed that chemotherapy-free immunotherapy with nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab may provide durable tumor regression with manageable toxicity in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer, regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression (Abstract 520MO).


Lung Cancer

Tony S.K. Mok, MD, on NSCLC: Review of Recent Data From the SUNRISE and ORIENT-31 Trials

Tony S.K. Mok, MD, of The Chinese University of Hong Kong, discusses two late-breaking abstracts presented at ESMO 2022: the phase II SUNRISE study, which compared sintilimab plus anlotinib vs platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); and the ORIENT-31 trial, which compared sintilimab with or without IBI305 (a bevacizumab biosimilar) plus chemotherapy in patients with EGFR-mutated nonsquamous NSCLC who experienced disease progression on EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Kidney Cancer

Toni K. Choueiri, MD, and Laurence Albiges, MD, PhD, on RCC: Recent Phase III Data on Cabozantinib, Nivolumab, and Ipilimumab From the COSMIC-313 Trial

Toni K. Choueiri, MD, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Laurence Albiges, MD, PhD, of France’s Gustave Roussy Cancer Centre, discuss phase III findings showing that cabozantinib in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab reduced the risk of disease progression or death compared with the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma of IMDC (the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium) intermediate or poor risk. However, the combination of cabozantinib, nivolumab, and ipilimumab vs nivolumab plus ipilimumab did not demonstrate an overall survival benefit to patients (Abstract LBA8).

Solid Tumors

Bernd Kasper, MD, PhD, on Desmoid Tumors: Results on Nirogacestat vs Placebo

Bernd Kasper, MD, PhD, of Germany’s Mannheim Cancer Center, discusses phase III data from the DeFi trial, the largest study conducted to date for patients with desmoid tumors. The trial showed that the gamma secretase inhibitor nirogacestat demonstrated improvements in all primary and secondary efficacy endpoints. Although considered benign because of their inability to metastasize, desmoid tumors can cause significant morbidity and, occasionally, mortality in patients (Abstract LBA2).

Head and Neck Cancer

Jean-Pascal Machiels, MD, PhD, on Head and Neck Cancer: Recent Data on Pembrolizumab and Chemoradiation Therapy

Jean-Pascal Machiels, MD, PhD, of Belgium’s Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc (UCLouvain), discusses the primary results of the phase III KEYNOTE-412 study of pembrolizumab plus chemoradiation therapy (CRT) vs placebo plus CRT for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (Abstract LBA5).