Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, FASCO, on PD-L1–Positive Advanced TNBC: First-Line Doublet Comparison
2025 ASCO Annual Meeting
Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, FASCO, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, discusses findings from the phase III ASCENT-04/KEYNOTE-D19 study, which compared sacituzumab govitecan-hziy plus pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab in previously untreated patients with PD-L1–positive advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (LBA109).
Transcript
Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
At ASCO this year, we presented results from the ASCENT-04 trial. This is a randomized phase three study of sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab compared to chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab in patients who have previously untreated PD-L1–positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. We know that about 15% of all breast cancers are triple-negative, and about 40% of triple-negative breast cancers are PD-L1–positive. Currently, these patients are treated with chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibition, where we've seen median progression-free survival that ranges between 7 to 9 months. We also have antibody-drug conjugates to treat pretreated metastatic triple-negative disease, and sacituzumab govitecan is a Trop-2–directed antibody-drug conjugate that has previously been found to improve both progression-free and overall survival in pretreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer and is currently a second-line standard-of-care option. There has been a lot of interest in combining antibody-drug conjugates with checkpoint inhibitors given some robust preclinical and clinical data. And so ASCENT-04 was really designed to test the efficacy of sacituzumab plus pembrolizumab. This trial was designed in patients who had no prior systemic therapy in the metastatic triple-negative setting. They had to either have de novo metastatic disease or be at least six months out from completion of any systemic therapy in the early disease setting. Prior use of checkpoint inhibition for early-stage breast cancer was allowed, and patients were randomized 1:1 to receive sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab or chemotherapy. A physician’s choice plus pembrolizumab or choice of chemotherapy could either be paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, or carboplatin and gemcitabine. For those patients on the chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab arm, if they progressed, they were allowed to get crossover treatment with sacituzumab govitecan monotherapy if they had centrally confirmed disease progression during the crossover phase of the study. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival by blinded independent central review, and the primary endpoint progression-free survival data demonstrated that sacituzumab plus pembrolizumab led to significant improvement in progression-free survival when compared to chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab, with an improvement in PFS going from 7.8 to 11.2 months with a hazard ratio of 0.65 and an absolute difference of about 3.4 months. Seeing these data with an improvement in PFS suggests that the combination of sacituzumab and pembrolizumab could represent a new standard-of-care option for patients who have previously untreated PD-L1–positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.
Related Videos
The ASCO Post Staff
Raffaele Califano, MD, of the Christie NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Manchester, discusses outcomes by osimertinib resistance mechanisms in MARIPOSA-2, a study that evaluated the efficacy of the bispecific antibody amivantamab-vmjw plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC after disease progression on osimertinib (Abstract 8639).
The ASCO Post Staff
Suneel Deepak Kamath, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic, reports findings from a study that evaluated funding from the NIH and Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs supporting lung, breast, colorectal, pancreatic, hepatobiliary, ovarian, cervical, endometrial, and prostate cancers, as well as leukemia, lymphoma, and melanoma, from 2013 to 2022 (Abstract 11025).
The ASCO Post Staff
William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses two abstracts on lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) in relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). In Abstract 7037, liso-cel with ibrutinib demonstrated better efficacy and safety compared with liso-cel monotherapy, with statistically significant differences for complete response rate and overall response rate. In Abstract 7039, patients with R/R CLL/SLL who had received two or more prior lines of therapy had improved response, delayed progression, and prolonged survival with liso-cel compared with a real-world cohort treated with standard-of-care therapy.
The ASCO Post Staff
Mazyar Shadman, MD, PhD, of Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center and the University of Washington, presents results from arm D of the SEQUOIA trial, which evaluated the combination of zanubrutinib and venetoclax in treatment-naive patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (Abstract 7009).
The ASCO Post Staff
Heinz-Josef Lenz, MD, of the University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, reviews analyses from the CheckMate 8HW trial, which evaluated nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs chemotherapy or nivolumab monotherapy for microsatellite instability–high/mismatch repair–deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (Abstract 3501).