Advertisement


Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, FASCO, on PD-L1–Positive Advanced TNBC: First-Line Doublet Comparison

2025 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, FASCO, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, discusses findings from the phase III ASCENT-04/KEYNOTE-D19 study, which compared sacituzumab govitecan-hziy plus pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab in previously untreated patients with PD-L1–positive advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (LBA109). 

 



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
At ASCO this year, we presented results from the ASCENT-04 trial. This is a randomized phase three study of sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab compared to chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab in patients who have previously untreated PD-L1–positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. We know that about 15% of all breast cancers are triple-negative, and about 40% of triple-negative breast cancers are PD-L1–positive. Currently, these patients are treated with chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibition, where we've seen median progression-free survival that ranges between 7 to 9 months. We also have antibody-drug conjugates to treat pretreated metastatic triple-negative disease, and sacituzumab govitecan is a Trop-2–directed antibody-drug conjugate that has previously been found to improve both progression-free and overall survival in pretreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer and is currently a second-line standard-of-care option. There has been a lot of interest in combining antibody-drug conjugates with checkpoint inhibitors given some robust preclinical and clinical data. And so ASCENT-04 was really designed to test the efficacy of sacituzumab plus pembrolizumab. This trial was designed in patients who had no prior systemic therapy in the metastatic triple-negative setting. They had to either have de novo metastatic disease or be at least six months out from completion of any systemic therapy in the early disease setting. Prior use of checkpoint inhibition for early-stage breast cancer was allowed, and patients were randomized 1:1 to receive sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab or chemotherapy. A physician’s choice plus pembrolizumab or choice of chemotherapy could either be paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, or carboplatin and gemcitabine. For those patients on the chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab arm, if they progressed, they were allowed to get crossover treatment with sacituzumab govitecan monotherapy if they had centrally confirmed disease progression during the crossover phase of the study. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival by blinded independent central review, and the primary endpoint progression-free survival data demonstrated that sacituzumab plus pembrolizumab led to significant improvement in progression-free survival when compared to chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab, with an improvement in PFS going from 7.8 to 11.2 months with a hazard ratio of 0.65 and an absolute difference of about 3.4 months. Seeing these data with an improvement in PFS suggests that the combination of sacituzumab and pembrolizumab could represent a new standard-of-care option for patients who have previously untreated PD-L1–positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.

Related Videos

Lung Cancer

David R. Spigel, MD, FASCO, on NSCLC Treatment Planning: Role of 14-Gene Molecular Assay

David R. Spigel, MD, FASCO, Chief Scientific Officer of Sarah Cannon Research Institute, reviews data on the role of a 14-gene molecular assay in selecting patients with stage IA–IIA non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as high risk (LBA8027). 

Colorectal Cancer

Christopher M. Booth, MD, on a Structured Exercise Program for Patients With Colon Cancer

Christopher M. Booth, MD, of Queen’s University, reviews findings from the randomized phase III Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG) CO.21 (CHALLENGE) trial, which evaluated the impact of a structured exercise program on disease-free survival in patients with stage III or high-risk stage II colon cancer (Abstract LBA3510). 

Prostate Cancer

Nicholas D. James, PhD, FRCP, MBBS, on Using AI to Identify Benefit From Prostate Cancer Therapy

Nicholas D. James, PhD, FRCP, MBBS, of The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, describes the use of a multimodal artificial intelligence (AI) model to identify benefit from second-generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitors in patients with high-risk nonmetastatic prostate cancer participating in the STAMPEDE trial (Abstract 5001). 

 

Breast Cancer

Nicholas C. Turner, MD, PhD, on Treating Emergent ESR1 Mutations in Advanced Breast Cancer

Nicholas C. Turner, MD, PhD, of the Royal Marsden Hospital, presents findings from the phase III, double-blind ctDNA-guided SERENA-6 trial, which evaluated the combination of camizestrant plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor to treat emergent ESR1 mutations during first-line endocrine therapy for patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (LBA4). 

Pancreatic Cancer

Asaf Maoz, MD, on Pancreatic Surveillance Eligibility Criteria

Asaf Maoz, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Mass General Brigham/Harvard Medical School, discusses the sensitivity of age and family history criteria for determining eligibility for pancreatic cancer surveillance among individuals with a hereditary risk for the malignancy (Abstract 10500). 

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement