Advertisement


Christopher M. Booth, MD, on a Structured Exercise Program for Patients With Colon Cancer

2025 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Christopher M. Booth, MD, of Queen’s University, reviews findings from the randomized phase III Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG) CO.21 (CHALLENGE) trial, which evaluated the impact of a structured exercise program on disease-free survival in patients with stage III or high-risk stage II colon cancer (Abstract LBA3510). 



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The Canadian Cancer Trials Group CO.21 Challenge trial was the first randomized controlled trial in any cancer to definitively ask the question whether exercise can improve cancer survival. Patients with colon cancer who had already completed surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy were eligible to be enrolled in this study. Patients were randomized to a control arm in which patients were given an informational booklet encouraging them to adopt a healthy lifestyle and to exercise, or the experimental arm where patients were given the same booklet, but they were also provided with a physical activity consultant for three years. And the goal of this physical activity consultant was to deliver behavior change intervention so that patients would change their lifestyle and over the first six months, gradually ramp up their exercise so that it increased by 10 metabolic hours per week. MET hours, a unit of exercise, and there's a number of different tables that will allow the exercise specialist to work with the patient to come up with an exercise prescription for the activities that make sense for that patient given their own lifestyle, whether it's a certain number of minutes of swimming, biking, running, jogging, kayaking, a prescription could be made to allow them to hit this target over the first six months. And the way this behavior change was done was over sessions, face-to-face sessions every two weeks. It would start with a motivational session to look at goal setting, time management, to review the exercise progress of the last month and to make plans for the next few weeks. And then there would be a supervised exercise session, usually on a treadmill or an exercise bike. And that happened every two weeks for the first six months as patients gradually ramped up their exercise. It continued for the next six months every two weeks. And then for year two and year three, there were monthly check-ins with the physical activity consultant and the patient to ensure that they maintained support to maintain that lifestyle intervention. The primary endpoint of the study was disease-free survival. The results quite frankly were astounding. They were really remarkable. The structured exercise program clearly allowed people to increase their exercise. Their physiologic measures of fitness also increased substantially. VO2 max and six-minute walk test, their quality of life and physical function improved, but what was even more remarkable is the survival benefit. So the disease-free survival hazard ratio was 0.72. So there was a 28% reduction in the risk of recurrent or new cancer. This translated to an absolute improvement of 6 percent, 74% versus 80% rates of disease-free survival at five years. That translates to for every 16 patients who went on the exercise program, one person was avoided having recurrent or new cancer. The overall survival benefits were also remarkable. There was a 37% reduction in the risk of death with a hazard ratio of 0.63, again both clinically significant and statistically significant. The eight-year overall survival rate was 83% in the control arm and 90% in the experimental arm. Again converting that to a number needed to treat, for every 14 patients who went on the exercise program, exercise saved one person's life. So really it's quite a remarkable magnitude of benefit. Looking at safety and toxicity, again, not surprisingly, there were no major differences except for a slight increase in the risk of musculoskeletal injury in the patients on the exercise arm. But in summary, this was the first clinical trial in the world that asked the question can exercise improve cancer survival? And clearly the answer is a resounding yes. And so as of now, we think that this is now a standard of care for patients with colon cancer and health systems need to provide this service. Knowledge of this benefit in itself is not necessarily going to be sufficient to allow most patients to change their lifestyle, sustain that change and realize the health benefits. We need providers, hospitals, cancer centers, payers and health systems to provide the structured exercise program as now a standard of care and part of standard cancer treatment for colon cancer.

Related Videos

Leukemia

William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, on Lisocabtagene Maraleucel in Relapsed/Refractory CLL: TRANSCEND CLL 004 

William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses two abstracts on lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) in relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). In Abstract 7037, liso-cel with ibrutinib demonstrated better efficacy and safety compared with liso-cel monotherapy, with statistically significant differences for complete response rate and overall response rate. In Abstract 7039, patients with R/R CLL/SLL who had received two or more prior lines of therapy had improved response, delayed progression, and prolonged survival with liso-cel compared with a real-world cohort treated with standard-of-care therapy. 

 

Lung Cancer

Raffaele Califano, MD, on EGFR-Mutant Advanced NSCLC: MARIPOSA-2

Raffaele Califano, MD, of the Christie NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Manchester, discusses outcomes by osimertinib resistance mechanisms in MARIPOSA-2, a study that evaluated the efficacy of the bispecific antibody amivantamab-vmjw plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC after disease progression on osimertinib (Abstract 8639). 

Lung Cancer

Martin Reck, MD, PhD, on Postsurgical MRD, Genomic Mutations, and Outcomes in Resectable NSCLC: AEGEAN Trial

Martin Reck, MD, PhD, of LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Germany, discusses data from the phase III AEGEAN trial that studied perioperative durvalumab and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients who were MRD-positive after surgery had significantly worse disease-free survival compared to MRD-negative patients. In addition, mutations in KEAP1 and KMT2C were associated with MRD positivity and reduced benefit from the regimen, identifying a small high-risk subgroup with poor prognosis (Abstract 8009). 

Lung Cancer

Rami Manochakian, MD, FASCO, on Tarlatamab vs Chemotherapy for Second-Line Treatment of SCLC: Expert Point of View

Rami Manochakian, MD, FASCO, of Mayo Clinic Florida, offers his thoughts on findings from the primary analysis of the phase III DeLLphi-304 trial, which compared tarlatamab-dlle, a bispecific T-cell engager immunotherapy targeting delta-like ligand 3 and CD3, with chemotherapy as a second-line treatment of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (LBA8008). 

Prostate Cancer

Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, FASCO, on How Does Androgen Receptor Inhibition Affect Quality of Life?

Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, FASCO, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses health-related quality-of-life data from the phase III ARANOTE trial, which evaluated the androgen receptor inhibitor darolutamide in combination with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) vs ADT plus placebo for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (Abstract 5004). 

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement