Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, FASCO, on How Does Androgen Receptor Inhibition Affect Quality of Life?
2025 ASCO Annual Meeting
Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, FASCO, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses health-related quality-of-life data from the phase III ARANOTE trial, which evaluated the androgen receptor inhibitor darolutamide in combination with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) vs ADT plus placebo for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (Abstract 5004).
Transcript
Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
On behalf of the ARASENS investigators, I was very pleased to present the ARASENS quality of life data. ARASENS is a phase three study in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Patients were enrolled and were randomized to ADT plus darolutamide versus ADT and placebo to assess a primary endpoint of radiographic progression-free survival of darolutamide in this setting. Importantly, patients who were enrolled were predominantly high-volume metastatic disease and most had de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive disease. In terms of the quality of life analysis, patients were assessed by the Brief Pain. In the patients treated with ADT plus darolutamide versus ADT alone. I think also importantly the subscales of the FACT-P that were analyzed did suggest that certain subscales were improved more than others including urinary symptoms and prostate cancer-specific symptoms as well as functional well-being and social well-being, suggesting that patients were reporting that they had better time with their families and performing their daily activities. Ultimately, these suggest that darolutamide in the addition to ADT were improving metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients' quality of life in addition to being associated with the radiographic progression-free survival advantage for this combination.
The ASCO Post Staff
Heinz-Josef Lenz, MD, of the University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, reviews analyses from the CheckMate 8HW trial, which evaluated nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs chemotherapy or nivolumab monotherapy for microsatellite instability–high/mismatch repair–deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (Abstract 3501).
The ASCO Post Staff
Nitin Jain, MD, Professor in the Department of Leukemia and Director of the Leukemia CAR-T Program at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, shares his expert point of view on data presented on front-line therapies for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) presented at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting.
The ASCO Post Staff
Raffaele Califano, MD, of the Christie NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Manchester, discusses outcomes by osimertinib resistance mechanisms in MARIPOSA-2, a study that evaluated the efficacy of the bispecific antibody amivantamab-vmjw plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC after disease progression on osimertinib (Abstract 8639).
The ASCO Post Staff
William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, reviews the final analysis of phase II CAPTIVATE study demonstrating the long-term efficacy and safety of ibrutinib plus venetoclax for previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), including in patients with high-risk genomic features. The 5.5-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 66% and 97%, respectively (Abstract 7036).
The ASCO Post Staff
Constantine Si Lun Tam, MD, FRACP, FRCPA, MBBS, of Alfred Hospital and Monash University, reviews results from the 5-year follow-up of arm C of the SEQUOIA trial of treatment-naive patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (Abstract 7011).