Advertisement


Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, FASCO, on How Does Androgen Receptor Inhibition Affect Quality of Life?

2025 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, FASCO, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses health-related quality-of-life data from the phase III ARANOTE trial, which evaluated the androgen receptor inhibitor darolutamide in combination with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) vs ADT plus placebo for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (Abstract 5004). 



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
On behalf of the ARASENS investigators, I was very pleased to present the ARASENS quality of life data. ARASENS is a phase three study in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Patients were enrolled and were randomized to ADT plus darolutamide versus ADT and placebo to assess a primary endpoint of radiographic progression-free survival of darolutamide in this setting. Importantly, patients who were enrolled were predominantly high-volume metastatic disease and most had de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive disease. In terms of the quality of life analysis, patients were assessed by the Brief Pain. In the patients treated with ADT plus darolutamide versus ADT alone. I think also importantly the subscales of the FACT-P that were analyzed did suggest that certain subscales were improved more than others including urinary symptoms and prostate cancer-specific symptoms as well as functional well-being and social well-being, suggesting that patients were reporting that they had better time with their families and performing their daily activities. Ultimately, these suggest that darolutamide in the addition to ADT were improving metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients' quality of life in addition to being associated with the radiographic progression-free survival advantage for this combination.

Related Videos

Leukemia

Mazyar Shadman, MD, PhD, on Doublet for Treatment-Naive CLL/SLL

Mazyar Shadman, MD, PhD, of Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center and the University of Washington, presents results from arm D of the SEQUOIA trial, which evaluated the combination of zanubrutinib and venetoclax in treatment-naive patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (Abstract 7009). 

Leukemia

William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, on Fixed-Duration Ibrutinib and Venetoclax in First-Line CLL

William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, reviews the final analysis of phase II CAPTIVATE study demonstrating the long-term efficacy and safety of ibrutinib plus venetoclax for previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), including in patients with high-risk genomic features. The 5.5-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 66% and 97%, respectively (Abstract 7036).

Lung Cancer

Rami Manochakian, MD, FASCO, on Tarlatamab vs Chemotherapy for Second-Line Treatment of SCLC: Expert Point of View

Rami Manochakian, MD, FASCO, of Mayo Clinic Florida, offers his thoughts on findings from the primary analysis of the phase III DeLLphi-304 trial, which compared tarlatamab-dlle, a bispecific T-cell engager immunotherapy targeting delta-like ligand 3 and CD3, with chemotherapy as a second-line treatment of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (LBA8008). 

Leukemia

Nitin Jain, MD, on Front-Line Therapies for CLL: Research Highlights From ASCO 2025

Nitin Jain, MD, Professor in the Department of Leukemia and Director of the Leukemia CAR-T Program at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, shares his expert point of view on data presented on front-line therapies for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) presented at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting. 

Hematologic Malignancies

Andrew Kuykendall, MD, on Hepcidin Mimetic for Polycythemia Vera

Andrew Kuykendall, MD, of Moffitt Cancer Center, discusses findings from the phase III VERIFY trial, which compared the efficacy of rusfertide vs placebo in patients with polycythemia vera who continue their current standard of care therapy (Abstract LBA3). 

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement