Advertisement


Sherene Loi, MD, PhD, on Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Weighing the Prognostic Value of ctDNA Detection

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Sherene Loi, MD, PhD, of Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, discusses a circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis from a cohort of patients with early-stage breast cancer who were enrolled in the monarchE trial. This large cohort was studied to look at the usefulness of a personalized tumor-informed assay for ctDNA detection in early stage high-risk patients (LBA507).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The monarchE study was a trial which was looking specifically a high-risk node-positive estrogen receptor positive early-stage breast cancer patients. We know that these patients have an extremely high risk of recurrence, particularly those that have four or more nodes or larger tumors with one to three positive nodes or high grade. The monarchE study showed the benefit of two years of adjuvant abemaciclib when added to endocrine therapy. In this particular study, we looked at 910 patients from the monarchE study. These patients were cross-treatment arms, and this group was enriched for invasive disease events. This is because we wanted to look at the sensitivity of the assay. The assay's tumor-informed, which means whole exome sequencing was performed on the primary tumor, and then each assay was designed specifically for the individual patient using that information. Patients had blood samples taken at baseline, so prior to treatment, or at three, six, or at the end of 24 months of treatment. What we found in these 910 patients was that the detection of ctDNA positivity at baseline occurred in about 8% of patients. This is a very low frequency of patients had positive ctDNA by this assay compared to the 27% of patients who had events that was enriched in this study. This was despite a high-risk population. What we did find, however, that serial sampling was very informative. Some patients that were undetectable at baseline became detectable. This was a further 10% of patients, so around 17% of patients of the 27% of patients who had an event were picked up by this assay. Of most interest was the patients that were negative or undetectable at baseline that became positive. We know that they did poorly actually. Most of these patients recurred, 100% of patients recurred. There were patients that were positive at baseline that remained positive. Those patients also did poorly, 100% rates. Of most interest to me were the patients who were positive at baseline, but then became undetectable using serial sampling. These patients had a better outcome than those patients who remained positive by the ctDNA. This suggests that the treatment was having an effect on the disease, perhaps curing some patients. This suggests that clearance of ctDNA may be a useful surrogate endpoint for evaluation of future therapies in the future or in future clinical trials. Our data also suggests that patients who are positive for ctDNA at baseline and remain positive have very aggressive disease and are resistant to treatment and in the future will need some sort of rethink or different types of therapy quite early on.

Related Videos

Kidney Cancer

Toni K. Choueiri, MD, FASCO, on RCC: Biomarker Analysis From the CLEAR Trial

Toni K. Choueiri, MD, FASCO, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses phase III findings showing that, in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the benefit of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab vs sunitinib in overall response rate does not appear to be affected by such factors as geneexpression signatures for tumorinduced proliferation, PDL1 status, or the mutation status of RCC driver genes.

Prostate Cancer

Alicia Morgans, MD, MPH, and Karim Fizazi, MD, PhD, on Prostate Cancer: Study Findings on Health-Related Quality of Life and Pain

Alicia Morgans, MD, MPH, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Karim Fizazi, MD, PhD, of Institut Gustave Roussy and the University of Paris-Saclay, discuss a second interim analysis of the health-related quality of life and pain outcomes in the PSMAfore study (Abstract 5003).

Skin Cancer

Omid Hamid, MD, on Cutaneous Melanoma: Update on a Bispecific Protein Under Study

Omid Hamid, MD, of The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, a Cedars-Sinai affiliate, discusses updated data on IMC-F106C, a novel bispecific protein that, in a phase I safety and efficacy study, exhibited clinical activity in patients with unresectable or metastatic cutaneous melanoma who were pretreated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. A phase III trial of IMC-F106C with nivolumab in the first-line setting of metastatic disease has been initiated (NCT06112314; Abstract 9507).

Breast Cancer

Eva M. Ciruelos, MD, PhD, on HER2-Positive and PAM50 Luminal Breast Cancer: Primary Results From the PATRICIA Trial

Eva M. Ciruelos, MD, PhD, of Spain’s Hospital 12 de Octubre and the Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre, discusses phase II data showing that the combination of palbociclib, trastuzumab, and endocrine therapy improved progression-free survival in patients with previously treated PAM50 luminal A or B, HER2-positive advanced breast cancer, as compared with treatment of physicians’ choice (Abstract 1008).

Pancreatic Cancer

Efrat Dotan, MD, on Pancreatic Cancer in Older Adults: Defining the Optimal Treatment Approach

Efrat Dotan, MD, of Fox Chase Cancer Center, discusses results from the phase II EA2186 trial, the first prospective study aiming to define the optimal treatment approach for vulnerable older adults with newly diagnosed metastatic pancreatic cancer (Abstract 4003).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement