Advertisement


Sherene Loi, MD, PhD, on Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Weighing the Prognostic Value of ctDNA Detection

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Sherene Loi, MD, PhD, of Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, discusses a circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis from a cohort of patients with early-stage breast cancer who were enrolled in the monarchE trial. This large cohort was studied to look at the usefulness of a personalized tumor-informed assay for ctDNA detection in early stage high-risk patients (LBA507).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The monarchE study was a trial which was looking specifically a high-risk node-positive estrogen receptor positive early-stage breast cancer patients. We know that these patients have an extremely high risk of recurrence, particularly those that have four or more nodes or larger tumors with one to three positive nodes or high grade. The monarchE study showed the benefit of two years of adjuvant abemaciclib when added to endocrine therapy. In this particular study, we looked at 910 patients from the monarchE study. These patients were cross-treatment arms, and this group was enriched for invasive disease events. This is because we wanted to look at the sensitivity of the assay. The assay's tumor-informed, which means whole exome sequencing was performed on the primary tumor, and then each assay was designed specifically for the individual patient using that information. Patients had blood samples taken at baseline, so prior to treatment, or at three, six, or at the end of 24 months of treatment. What we found in these 910 patients was that the detection of ctDNA positivity at baseline occurred in about 8% of patients. This is a very low frequency of patients had positive ctDNA by this assay compared to the 27% of patients who had events that was enriched in this study. This was despite a high-risk population. What we did find, however, that serial sampling was very informative. Some patients that were undetectable at baseline became detectable. This was a further 10% of patients, so around 17% of patients of the 27% of patients who had an event were picked up by this assay. Of most interest was the patients that were negative or undetectable at baseline that became positive. We know that they did poorly actually. Most of these patients recurred, 100% of patients recurred. There were patients that were positive at baseline that remained positive. Those patients also did poorly, 100% rates. Of most interest to me were the patients who were positive at baseline, but then became undetectable using serial sampling. These patients had a better outcome than those patients who remained positive by the ctDNA. This suggests that the treatment was having an effect on the disease, perhaps curing some patients. This suggests that clearance of ctDNA may be a useful surrogate endpoint for evaluation of future therapies in the future or in future clinical trials. Our data also suggests that patients who are positive for ctDNA at baseline and remain positive have very aggressive disease and are resistant to treatment and in the future will need some sort of rethink or different types of therapy quite early on.

Related Videos

Gynecologic Cancers

Alex Andrea Francoeur, MD, on Endometrial Cancer and Obesity Trends

Alex Andrea Francoeur, MD, of UC Irvine Health, discusses data showing an association between the increasing incidence of endometrial cancer and obesity, which disproportionately affects younger women and women of color. According to Dr. Francoeur, the findings warrant targeted health services and public health interventions to stabilize and ultimately reverse the rising rates (Abstract 5507).

Lung Cancer

Narjust Florez, MD, and Suresh S. Ramalingam, MD, on EGFR-Mutated NSCLC: Update on Osimertinib and Chemoradiotherapy

Narjust Florez, MD, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Suresh S. Ramalingam, MD, of Emory University School of Medicine, Winship Cancer Institute, discuss potentially practice-changing phase III results from the LAURA study. This trial showed that osimertinib after definitive chemoradiation therapy improved progression-free survival for patients with unresectable stage III EGFR-mutated non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), suggesting this agent may represent a new standard of care in this setting (LBA4).

Leukemia
Immunotherapy

Allison M. Winter, MD, on Richter Transformation: New Data on a CAR T-Cell Treatment

Allison M. Winter, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, discusses real-world outcomes with lisocabtagene maraleucel in patients with Richter transformation, a difficult-to-treat population with a poor prognosis. Data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research showed this therapy provided clinical benefit with a high complete response rate (Abstract 7010).

Breast Cancer

Ana C. Garrido-Castro, MD, on Managing Metastatic Breast Cancer in 2024

Ana C. Garrido-Castro, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses recent approvals of multiple novel therapies for metastatic breast cancer, weighing their potential benefits and risks, understanding the mechanisms that drive response and resistance, and exploring how to optimally sequence them to enhance survival and quality of life.

Skin Cancer

Omid Hamid, MD, on Cutaneous Melanoma: Update on a Bispecific Protein Under Study

Omid Hamid, MD, of The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, a Cedars-Sinai affiliate, discusses updated data on IMC-F106C, a novel bispecific protein that, in a phase I safety and efficacy study, exhibited clinical activity in patients with unresectable or metastatic cutaneous melanoma who were pretreated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. A phase III trial of IMC-F106C with nivolumab in the first-line setting of metastatic disease has been initiated (NCT06112314; Abstract 9507).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement