Thierry Facon, MD, on Multiple Myeloma: Results From the IMROZ Study on Isatuximab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone
2024 ASCO Annual Meeting
Thierry Facon, MD, of the University of Lille and Lille University Hospital, discusses phase III findings showing for the first time that isatuximab, an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, when given with the standard of care (bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone, or VRd) to patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are transplant-ineligible, may reduce the risk of disease progression or death by 40.4% vs VRd alone (Abstract 7500).
Transcript
Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The purpose of the study was to assess the clinical benefit of adding isatuximab, which is an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody to bortezomib lendalidomide and dexamethasone referred as the VRd regimen. So this study is the first study combining a CD38 monoclonal antibody to the VRd platform. And this study is conducted in transplant-ineligible patient with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Importantly, the VRd regimen is a very well-established standard of care for the elderly and also for transplant-eligible patients. And also importantly, these elderly patients have still an unmet medical need, and it's extremely important for this particular patient to have a very strong and effective first-line therapy. So the study was conducted as a phase III international study in 21 countries, and we enrolled 446 patients randomly allocated to either Isa-VRd, or VRd, followed by Isa-Rd, or Rd alone. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. So the study met its primary endpoint of PFS with a very strong benefit in favor of the isatuximab arm.
The median PFS was not reached for the Isa-VRd arm and was 54 months for the VRd arm. The five-year PFS rate was 45% for VRd versus 63% for Isa-VRd. The hazard ratio was 0.596. So this was both statistically and clinically a very significant difference.
Besides this PFS benefit, we had also an important benefit in terms of response, including high quality responses. The complete response rate was 64% for VRd versus 75% for Isa-VRd. We assessed minimal residual disease. So MRD and MRD negativity was seen in MRD, negative CR was seen in 55% of the Isa-VRd patients versus 41% of the VRd patients. Sustained MRD negativity for more than one year was almost double in the Isa-VRd arm from 24% to 47%.
In terms of safety, this regimen was well-tolerated. The safety profile was in line with the safety profiles of each agent, and these agents are known for many years. So we did not see any new safety signal, and the safety of this regimen was considered to be good for this elderly patient. Also, considering that we did exclude patients over the age of 80 years. The conclusion is just to say that this Isa-VRd regimen will become likely a new standard of care for transplant-ineligible patients below the age of 80 years. So this is an important result based on a very strong efficacy and an adequate safety profile.
Related Videos
The ASCO Post Staff
Jean-Marc Classe, MD, PhD, of France’s Nantes Université, discusses phase III results showing that systematic lymphadenectomy should be omitted in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer with clinically negative lymph nodes, as well as those undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval complete surgery (LBA5505).
The ASCO Post Staff
Laurence Albiges, MD, PhD, of Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, discusses phase III findings showing that high baseline serum KIM-1 levels were associated with poorer prognosis but improved clinical outcomes with atezolizumab vs placebo in patients with renal cell carcinoma at increased risk of recurrence after resection. Increased post-treatment KIM-1 levels were found to be associated with worse disease-free survival (Abstract 4506).
The ASCO Post Staff
Axel Hauschild, MD, of Germany’s University of Kiel and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, discusses phase III study results on neoadjuvant intralesional daromun vs immediate surgery for patients with fully resectable, locally advanced melanoma (Abstract LBA9501).
The ASCO Post Staff
Ana C. Garrido-Castro, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses recent approvals of multiple novel therapies for metastatic breast cancer, weighing their potential benefits and risks, understanding the mechanisms that drive response and resistance, and exploring how to optimally sequence them to enhance survival and quality of life.
The ASCO Post Staff
Mazyar Shadman, MD, MPH, of Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, discusses an ongoing phase III study of the BCL2 inhibitor sonrotoclax plus zanubrutinib vs venetoclax and obinutuzumab for patients with treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia. The investigators are recruiting internationally (see NCT06073821; Abstract TPS7087).