Advertisement


Peter Riedell, MD, on DLBCL: Expert Commentary on the DEB Study

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Peter Riedell, MD, of The University of Chicago, discusses phase III results on the use of tucidinostat plus R-CHOP in patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with double expression of MYC and BCL2. The regimen appeared to improve event-free survival and complete response rates vs R-CHOP in the front-line setting. As this is an interim analysis, longer-term follow-up will be needed to better understand its impact, says Dr. Riedell.



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The DEB study was a phase three clinical trial that was recently presented at the ASCO meeting. This study evaluated the combination of R-CHOP with HDAC inhibitor, Tucidinostat. In this trial, it was conducted exclusively in China and it enrolled patients in the frontline setting that had double expressor lymphoma. Double expressor lymphoma is the specific subset of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma that shows increased expression of both MIC and BCL2 without the associated gene rearrangements. In this clinical trial, patients were randomized to either placebo or Tucidinostat in combination with R-CHOP, and they received that for six cycles and then went on to receive either maintenance therapy with Tucidinostat or placebo. The combination of Tucidinostat and R-CHOP in this clinical trial actually yielded increased CR rates compared to R-CHOP therapy alone, and additionally, this translated into an event-free survival benefit as well. Though there's only a short follow-up of approximately 13.9 months median at this point, and therefore we need longer followup to get a better understanding of outcomes. Importantly, this study did not show a difference in overall survival at this point. The combination of Tucidinostat and R-CHOP was relatively well tolerated, though we did see a higher incidence of hematologic toxicity along with infectious complications compared to R-CHOP therapy alone. This is overall my take on this is it's encouraging data, but we do need to have longer term followup. Additionally, questions do still remain regarding if this data is applicable to non-Asian populations, what's the impact of maintenance therapy in this clinical trial that was employed, and then, additionally, how do these results really compare to one of the other standards of care that we use in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, which is Polatuzumab RCHP.

Related Videos

Breast Cancer

Emily L. Podany, MD, on Metastatic Breast Cancer: Racial Differences in Genomic Profiles and Targeted Treatment Use

Emily L. Podany, MD, of Washington University, St. Louis, discusses disparities in the use of PI3K inhibitors for Black patients with estrogen receptor–positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer while other drugs that do not require genomic profiling were similarly used (Abstract 1017). 

Multiple Myeloma

Suzanne Trudel, MD, on Multiple Myeloma: Results From the DREAMM-8 Study of Treatments After Relapse

Suzanne Trudel, MD, of Canada’s Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, discusses phase III findings showing that, in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who had one or more prior lines of treatment, belantamab mafodotin-blmf plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone improved progression-free survival and showed a favorable overall survival trend compared with pomalidomide plus bortezomib and dexamethasone.

Multiple Myeloma

Claudio Cerchione, MD, PhD, on Staging Multiple Myeloma: New Findings on FDG PET/CT Scans and Whole-Body MRI

Claudio Cerchione, MD, PhD, of Italy’s Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, discusses preliminary findings from a prospective trial suggesting that by adding whole-body MRI to fludeoxyglucose-18 (FDG) PET/CT scans, clinicians may detect bone lesions earlier and more accurately in patients with either newly diagnosed or relapsed multiple myeloma, thus translating into potentially better outcomes (Abstract 7512).

Bladder Cancer

Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, and Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, on Urothelial Carcinoma: Expert Commentary on Two Key Abstracts

Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, of Barts Cancer Institute and the University of London, discuss phase III findings from two studies: the first, investigating enfortumab vedotin-ejfv and pembrolizumab vs platinum-based chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer; and the second, looking at nivolumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin vs gemcitabine and cisplatin alone in patients with lymph node–only metastatic disease enrolled in the CheckMate 901 trial (Abstracts 4581 and 4565).

Lymphoma

Peter Riedell, MD, on DLBCL: Expert Commentary on Data From the ECHELON-3 Study

Peter Riedell, MD, of The University of Chicago, discusses phase III findings on the regimen of brentuximab vedotin in combination with lenalidomide and rituximab for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This therapy demonstrated a survival advantage in the third-line setting, but as this is an interim analysis, questions remain regarding long-term safety and duration of response, according to Dr. Riedell (Abstract LBA7005).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement