Advertisement


Peter Riedell, MD, on DLBCL: Expert Commentary on the DEB Study

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Peter Riedell, MD, of The University of Chicago, discusses phase III results on the use of tucidinostat plus R-CHOP in patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with double expression of MYC and BCL2. The regimen appeared to improve event-free survival and complete response rates vs R-CHOP in the front-line setting. As this is an interim analysis, longer-term follow-up will be needed to better understand its impact, says Dr. Riedell.



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The DEB study was a phase three clinical trial that was recently presented at the ASCO meeting. This study evaluated the combination of R-CHOP with HDAC inhibitor, Tucidinostat. In this trial, it was conducted exclusively in China and it enrolled patients in the frontline setting that had double expressor lymphoma. Double expressor lymphoma is the specific subset of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma that shows increased expression of both MIC and BCL2 without the associated gene rearrangements. In this clinical trial, patients were randomized to either placebo or Tucidinostat in combination with R-CHOP, and they received that for six cycles and then went on to receive either maintenance therapy with Tucidinostat or placebo. The combination of Tucidinostat and R-CHOP in this clinical trial actually yielded increased CR rates compared to R-CHOP therapy alone, and additionally, this translated into an event-free survival benefit as well. Though there's only a short follow-up of approximately 13.9 months median at this point, and therefore we need longer followup to get a better understanding of outcomes. Importantly, this study did not show a difference in overall survival at this point. The combination of Tucidinostat and R-CHOP was relatively well tolerated, though we did see a higher incidence of hematologic toxicity along with infectious complications compared to R-CHOP therapy alone. This is overall my take on this is it's encouraging data, but we do need to have longer term followup. Additionally, questions do still remain regarding if this data is applicable to non-Asian populations, what's the impact of maintenance therapy in this clinical trial that was employed, and then, additionally, how do these results really compare to one of the other standards of care that we use in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, which is Polatuzumab RCHP.

Related Videos

Colorectal Cancer

Jeanne Tie, MD, MBChB, on Colon Cancer: New Data on ctDNA Guiding Adjuvant Therapy

Jeanne Tie, MD, MBChB, of Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, discusses data on survival and updated 5-year results from the DYNAMIC trial, which supports a role for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis, including serial sampling, in the management of patients with stage II colon cancer (Abstract 108).

Kidney Cancer

Toni K. Choueiri, MD, FASCO, on RCC: Biomarker Analysis From the CLEAR Trial

Toni K. Choueiri, MD, FASCO, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses phase III findings showing that, in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the benefit of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab vs sunitinib in overall response rate does not appear to be affected by such factors as geneexpression signatures for tumorinduced proliferation, PDL1 status, or the mutation status of RCC driver genes.

Lymphoma

Yasmin H. Karimi, MD, on Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Update on Use of Epcoritamab Plus Chemotherapy

Yasmin H. Karimi, MD, of the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses data reaffirming the efficacy and feasibility of using epcoritamab plus R-DHAX/C (rituximab, dexamethasone, cytarabine, and oxaliplatin or carboplatin) in autologous stem cell transplant–eligible patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Response rates were reported to be high, and most patients proceeded to transplant (Abstract 7032).

Bladder Cancer

Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, and Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, on Urothelial Carcinoma: Expert Commentary on Two Key Abstracts

Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, of Barts Cancer Institute and the University of London, discuss phase III findings from two studies: the first, investigating enfortumab vedotin-ejfv and pembrolizumab vs platinum-based chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer; and the second, looking at nivolumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin vs gemcitabine and cisplatin alone in patients with lymph node–only metastatic disease enrolled in the CheckMate 901 trial (Abstracts 4581 and 4565).

Breast Cancer

Pierfranco Conte, MD, on Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Trial Update on Avelumab as Adjuvant Treatment

Pierfranco Conte, MD, of the University of Padua, discusses phase III findings from the A-BRAVE trial, which was designed to evaluate the efficacy of avelumab, an anti–PD-L1 antibody, as adjuvant treatment for patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer who are at high risk (LBA500).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement