Advertisement


Mazyar Shadman, MD, MPH, on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Recruiting for the CELESTIAL-TNCLL Study

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Mazyar Shadman, MD, MPH, of Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, discusses an ongoing phase III study of the BCL2 inhibitor sonrotoclax plus zanubrutinib vs venetoclax and obinutuzumab for patients with treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia. The investigators are recruiting internationally (see NCT06073821; Abstract TPS7087).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
This year at the ASCO meeting, I had the opportunity of presenting a trial in progress. This is CELESTRIAL-CLLTN trial, which is a global head-to-head Phase III trial comparing the investigational combination using zanubrutinib, a second generation BTK inhibitor, in combination with sonrotoclax, which is a novel BCL2 inhibitor, and we are comparing that to a standard arm of venetoclax plus obinutuzumab for treatment of first line CLL patients who require treatment. As a background, we currently have two options for first line treatment of CLL. We either go with continuous BTK inhibitor therapy until progression or intolerance, or we use a time-limited approach using venetoclax in combination with obinutuzumab. If the study is positive, we'll introduce another time-limited option, which is all oral and chemoimmunotherapy free. Zanubrutinib is already approved for CLL in all lines of therapy, and in clinical trial has been shown to be superior to ibrutinib both from the efficacy and safety standpoint. Sonrotoclax is a novel BCL2 inhibitor, has shown very promising activity both from the safety and efficacy standpoints. In fact, in a study that was presented at ASH in 2023, we saw an extremely effective combination and also very well-tolerated treatment option for CLL patients. What this study is trying to do is comparing sonrotoclax and zanubrutinib to venetoclax and obinutuzumab. This is a global study with more than 640 patients planned to be enrolled, and patients will be randomized to receive one of the two options. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival, and we are going for superiority of the investigational arm over the standard of care arm. This study is currently ongoing, and we encourage our colleagues to contact the participating sites and PIs if they have any patients who requires treatment for first line CLL.

Related Videos

Lung Cancer

Minesh P. Mehta, MD, on NSCLC: Tumor Treating Fields for Brain Metastases

Minesh P. Mehta, MD, of Miami Cancer Institute, part of Baptist Health South Florida, discusses results from the METIS (EF-25) trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of tumor treating fields therapy following stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with mutation-negative non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases. Tumor treating fields therapy prolongs time to intracranial disease progression and may postpone whole-brain radiation therapy without declines in quality of life and cognition (Abstract 2008).

Lymphoma

Joshua D. Brody, MD, on Follicular Lymphoma: New Data on Epcoritamab, Rituximab, and Lenalidomide

Joshua D. Brody, MD, of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, discusses results from the EPCORE NHL-2 study, which was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of epcoritamab-bysp plus rituximab and lenalidomide in the first-line setting for patients with follicular lymphoma and to assess epcoritamab as maintenance therapy in this population (Abstract 7014).

Lymphoma

Yasmin H. Karimi, MD, on Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Follow-up on Subcutaneous Epcoritamab Monotherapy

Yasmin H. Karimi, MD, of the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses 2.5-year follow-up data on epcoritamab monotherapy for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma. The subcutaneous regimen continues to demonstrate durable responses (Abstract 7039).

Skin Cancer

Christian U. Blank, MD, PhD, on Melanoma: Potentially Practice-Changing Results From the NADINA Trial

Christian U. Blank, MD, PhD, of the Netherlands Cancer Institute, discusses findings of an investigator-initiated phase III trial showing that neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab followed by response-driven adjuvant treatment improved event-free survival in patients with macroscopic, resectable stage III melanoma compared with adjuvant nivolumab (LBA2)

Skin Cancer

Pauline Funchain, MD, and Caroline Robert, MD, PhD, on Melanoma: New Data on Encorafenib, Binimetinib, Ipilimumab, and Nivolumab

Pauline Funchain, MD, of Stanford University, and Caroline Robert, MD, PhD, of Gustave Roussy, discuss phase II findings showing that combining encorafenib and binimetinib followed by ipilimumab and nivolumab vs ipilimumab and nivolumab can improve progression-free survival in patients with BRAF-V600E/K-mutated melanoma characterized by high lactate dehydrogenase and liver metastases (Abstract LBA9503).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement