Advertisement


Mazyar Shadman, MD, MPH, on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Recruiting for the CELESTIAL-TNCLL Study

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Mazyar Shadman, MD, MPH, of Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, discusses an ongoing phase III study of the BCL2 inhibitor sonrotoclax plus zanubrutinib vs venetoclax and obinutuzumab for patients with treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia. The investigators are recruiting internationally (see NCT06073821; Abstract TPS7087).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
This year at the ASCO meeting, I had the opportunity of presenting a trial in progress. This is CELESTRIAL-CLLTN trial, which is a global head-to-head Phase III trial comparing the investigational combination using zanubrutinib, a second generation BTK inhibitor, in combination with sonrotoclax, which is a novel BCL2 inhibitor, and we are comparing that to a standard arm of venetoclax plus obinutuzumab for treatment of first line CLL patients who require treatment. As a background, we currently have two options for first line treatment of CLL. We either go with continuous BTK inhibitor therapy until progression or intolerance, or we use a time-limited approach using venetoclax in combination with obinutuzumab. If the study is positive, we'll introduce another time-limited option, which is all oral and chemoimmunotherapy free. Zanubrutinib is already approved for CLL in all lines of therapy, and in clinical trial has been shown to be superior to ibrutinib both from the efficacy and safety standpoint. Sonrotoclax is a novel BCL2 inhibitor, has shown very promising activity both from the safety and efficacy standpoints. In fact, in a study that was presented at ASH in 2023, we saw an extremely effective combination and also very well-tolerated treatment option for CLL patients. What this study is trying to do is comparing sonrotoclax and zanubrutinib to venetoclax and obinutuzumab. This is a global study with more than 640 patients planned to be enrolled, and patients will be randomized to receive one of the two options. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival, and we are going for superiority of the investigational arm over the standard of care arm. This study is currently ongoing, and we encourage our colleagues to contact the participating sites and PIs if they have any patients who requires treatment for first line CLL.

Related Videos

Bladder Cancer

Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, and Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, on Urothelial Carcinoma: Expert Commentary on Two Key Abstracts

Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, of Barts Cancer Institute and the University of London, discuss phase III findings from two studies: the first, investigating enfortumab vedotin-ejfv and pembrolizumab vs platinum-based chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer; and the second, looking at nivolumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin vs gemcitabine and cisplatin alone in patients with lymph node–only metastatic disease enrolled in the CheckMate 901 trial (Abstracts 4581 and 4565).

Lung Cancer

Tony S.K. Mok, MD, on NSCLC: Adagrasib vs Docetaxel in KRAS G12C–Mutated Disease

Tony S.K. Mok, MD, of The Chinese University of Hong Kong, discusses phase III findings from the KRYSTAL-12 study, which showed that adagrasib improved progression-free survival and overall response rate over docetaxel in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer harboring a KRAS G12C mutation who had previously received a platinum-based chemotherapy with anti–PD-(L)1 treatment.

Skin Cancer

Pauline Funchain, MD, and Caroline Robert, MD, PhD, on Melanoma: New Data on Encorafenib, Binimetinib, Ipilimumab, and Nivolumab

Pauline Funchain, MD, of Stanford University, and Caroline Robert, MD, PhD, of Gustave Roussy, discuss phase II findings showing that combining encorafenib and binimetinib followed by ipilimumab and nivolumab vs ipilimumab and nivolumab can improve progression-free survival in patients with BRAF-V600E/K-mutated melanoma characterized by high lactate dehydrogenase and liver metastases (Abstract LBA9503).

Lung Cancer

Minesh P. Mehta, MD, on NSCLC: Tumor Treating Fields for Brain Metastases

Minesh P. Mehta, MD, of Miami Cancer Institute, part of Baptist Health South Florida, discusses results from the METIS (EF-25) trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of tumor treating fields therapy following stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with mutation-negative non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases. Tumor treating fields therapy prolongs time to intracranial disease progression and may postpone whole-brain radiation therapy without declines in quality of life and cognition (Abstract 2008).

Breast Cancer

Sherene Loi, MD, PhD, on Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Weighing the Prognostic Value of ctDNA Detection

Sherene Loi, MD, PhD, of Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, discusses a circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis from a cohort of patients with early-stage breast cancer who were enrolled in the monarchE trial. This large cohort was studied to look at the usefulness of a personalized tumor-informed assay for ctDNA detection in early stage high-risk patients (LBA507).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement