Advertisement


Mostafa Eyada, MD, on Oral Cyclophosphamide Plus Bevacizumab in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Mostafa Eyada, MD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses study results showing that bevacizumab in combination with oral cyclophosphamide had a response rate of 40% in patients with recurrent platinum-resistant high-grade ovarian cancer (Abstract 5517).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Oral cyclophosphamide, bevacizumab, and pembrolizumab, is listed based on an NCCN compendium, based on phase two clinical trials like to comparison arm. So we wanted to test only the efficacy and safety of oral cyclophosphamide and bevacizumab in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. We did a retrospective analysis study and we enrolled patients with high-grade recurrent ovarian cancer. And treatment regimen consisted of bevacizumab, 15 milligrams per kg every three weeks intravenously, plus oral cyclophosphamide, 50 milligrams daily, orally. And we looked at the response rate in terms of objective response rate, was patients who had partial or complete response, and this was calculated with a 95% confidence interval and adverse events were collected and graded for results. We included a hundred patients in our study and median age was 58. Majority of patients were white, 75%, and ovarian cancer was in 83% of the patients. A high-grade ovarian cancer was 94% and 96% of patients had either stage III-C, or stage IV cancer. In terms of chemotherapy characteristics, patients were heavily treated before getting this regimen. They received a median of three prior lines of treatment before getting this regimen, and range was one to nine and patients received an average five cycle from this regimen. Majority of patients were platinum resistant, 86%, and in terms of free response, 36% had partial response and 4% had complete response. 20% had stable disease and 40% had progressive disease. In terms of adverse events, 24% had adverse events, but grade III and IV toxicities were thrombocytopenia and 3% hemorrhagic cystitis in 1%, and nausea and vomiting in 4%, and hypertension in 3%. In terms of relationship between objective response rate and different variables, there was no relationship between platinum free interval or platinum status observation and having a response to this regimen. In terms of receiving bevacizumab in a prior treatment regimen and having a response to this regimen, patients who did receive bevacizumab in a prior treatment regimen had the response rate of 36%, and patients who did not receive bevacizumab in a prior treatment regimen had a response rate of 42%. However, the B value was not significant. In conclusion, oral cyclophosphamide plus bevacizumab was well tolerated and effective for patients with recurrent high grade platinum resistant ovarian cancer who had an objective response rate of 40.6% and progression free survival of 4.6 month.

Related Videos

Breast Cancer

Milana Bergamino Sirvén, MD, PhD, on HER2-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Molecular Profiling, Prognosis, and Treatment Options

Milana Bergamino Sirvén, MD, PhD, of Spain’s Institute of Cancer Research, discusses her findings on molecular profiling of patients with estrogen receptor–positive, HER2-positive early-stage breast tumors after short-term preoperative endocrine therapy. This study suggests that such profiling may help clinicians identify those patients with a favorable prognosis for adjuvant endocrine therapy and those who may require additional treatment (Abstract 560).

Lung Cancer

Heather Wakelee, MD, on NSCLC: IMpower010 Survival Results After Long-Term Follow-up of Atezolizumab vs Best Supportive Care

Heather Wakelee, MD, of Stanford University Medical Center, discusses phase III findings showing that the disease-free survival benefit with adjuvant atezolizumab continues to translate into a positive overall survival trend vs best supportive care in patients with stage II–IIIA non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These results further support the use of adjuvant atezolizumab in PD-L1–selected populations, according to Dr. Wakelee (LBA8035).

Lung Cancer

Minesh P. Mehta, MD, on NSCLC: Tumor Treating Fields for Brain Metastases

Minesh P. Mehta, MD, of Miami Cancer Institute, part of Baptist Health South Florida, discusses results from the METIS (EF-25) trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of tumor treating fields therapy following stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with mutation-negative non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases. Tumor treating fields therapy prolongs time to intracranial disease progression and may postpone whole-brain radiation therapy without declines in quality of life and cognition (Abstract 2008).

Skin Cancer

Axel Hauschild, MD, on Melanoma: Findings From the PIVOTAL Trial of Daromun vs Surgery

Axel Hauschild, MD, of Germany’s University of Kiel and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, discusses phase III study results on neoadjuvant intralesional daromun vs immediate surgery for patients with fully resectable, locally advanced melanoma (Abstract LBA9501).

Lung Cancer

Tomasz Jankowski, MD, PhD, on Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: New Data on a Telomere-Targeting Agent

Tomasz Jankowski, MD, PhD, of Poland’s Medical University in Lublin, discusses a phase II study of THIO, a telomere-targeting agent followed by cemiplimab-rwlc for a difficult-to-treat population of patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (Abstract 8601).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement