Advertisement


Heather Wakelee, MD, on NSCLC: IMpower010 Survival Results After Long-Term Follow-up of Atezolizumab vs Best Supportive Care

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Heather Wakelee, MD, of Stanford University Medical Center, discusses phase III findings showing that the disease-free survival benefit with adjuvant atezolizumab continues to translate into a positive overall survival trend vs best supportive care in patients with stage II–IIIA non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These results further support the use of adjuvant atezolizumab in PD-L1–selected populations, according to Dr. Wakelee (LBA8035).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
IMpower010, which looked at adjuvant atezolizumab for patients with completely resected early stage non-small cell lung cancer, we presented the long-term final disease-free survival as well as the second interim overall survival data, now with over 60 months of follow-up. The study had a complex hierarchical statistical design such that first group were those with PD-L1 expression stage 2 to 3A, next group, all stage 2 to 3A, then all comers, including about 12% of patients with 1B, and only if all three of those were met could we formally test overall survival. As was seen in the first interim analysis, the second interim now with the final disease-free survival in that first group with PD-L1 expression stage 2 to 3A remains robust with a hazard ratio of 0.7, translating into nearly a 30-month difference in disease-free survival. In the second group, when we look at all stage 2 to 3A, continue to see a disease-free survival benefit, which does reach statistical significance, hazard ratio of 0.85. But when we bring in that stage 1B, that drops to... Sorry, that was 0.83. ... 0.85, when we bring in that other group, no longer statistically significant. So overall survival could not be formally tested, but we do continue to see this robust disease-free survival benefit, particularly in those with PD-L1 expression. And when we look at those with the highest PD-L1 expression, greater than 50%, that disease-free survival benefit hazard ratio was 0.48. We haven't reached the median for that group of patients. And, in that group, the overall survival hazard ratio was 0.47. However, we can't formally statistically test that because of the way the trial is designed. So in conclusion, when we look at this final disease-free survival result and second interim overall survival result from IMpower010, we do continue to see robust clinical benefit for patients who have gone through surgical resection with early stage lung cancer, stage 2 to 3A, where their tumor expresses PD-L1 expression. And we do believe this continues to be a very reasonable treatment option for that subgroup of patients where there is PD-L1 expression, particularly in those with the highest PD-L1 expression of greater than 50%.

Related Videos

Skin Cancer

Georgina V. Long, MD, PhD, on BRAF-Mutated Melanoma: Long-Term Follow-up of Adjuvant Dabrafenib Plus Trametinib vs Placebo

Georgina V. Long, MD, PhD, of the Melanoma Institute Australia and The University of Sydney, discusses final results with up to 10 years’ follow-up data of the COMBI-AD study of patients with stage III BRAF-mutated melanoma who received adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib (Abstract 9500).

Lung Cancer

Tony S.K. Mok, MD, on NSCLC: Adagrasib vs Docetaxel in KRAS G12C–Mutated Disease

Tony S.K. Mok, MD, of The Chinese University of Hong Kong, discusses phase III findings from the KRYSTAL-12 study, which showed that adagrasib improved progression-free survival and overall response rate over docetaxel in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer harboring a KRAS G12C mutation who had previously received a platinum-based chemotherapy with anti–PD-(L)1 treatment.

Leukemia
Lymphoma

William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, on CLL/SLL: Updated Findings on Ibrutinib and Venetoclax

William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses up to 5.5 years of follow-up data from the phase II CAPTIVATE study, showing that in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), fixed duration ibrutinib plus venetoclax continues to provide clinically meaningful progression-free disease in those with high-risk genomic features as well as in the overall population (Abstract 7009).

Bladder Cancer

Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, and Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, on Urothelial Carcinoma: Expert Commentary on Two Key Abstracts

Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, of Barts Cancer Institute and the University of London, discuss phase III findings from two studies: the first, investigating enfortumab vedotin-ejfv and pembrolizumab vs platinum-based chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer; and the second, looking at nivolumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin vs gemcitabine and cisplatin alone in patients with lymph node–only metastatic disease enrolled in the CheckMate 901 trial (Abstracts 4581 and 4565).

Skin Cancer

Pauline Funchain, MD, and Caroline Robert, MD, PhD, on Melanoma: New Data on Encorafenib, Binimetinib, Ipilimumab, and Nivolumab

Pauline Funchain, MD, of Stanford University, and Caroline Robert, MD, PhD, of Gustave Roussy, discuss phase II findings showing that combining encorafenib and binimetinib followed by ipilimumab and nivolumab vs ipilimumab and nivolumab can improve progression-free survival in patients with BRAF-V600E/K-mutated melanoma characterized by high lactate dehydrogenase and liver metastases (Abstract LBA9503).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement