Advertisement


Denise A. Yardley, MD, on Early Breast Cancer: Findings From the NATALEE Trial on Patients With Node-Negative Disease

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Denise A. Yardley, MD, of the Sarah Cannon Research Institute, discusses the NATALEE trial, which assessed ribociclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) vs an NSAI alone in patients with hormone receptor–positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer at increased risk of recurrence, including patients with node-negative disease, and showed a benefit in invasive disease–free survival (Abstract 512).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer, unfortunately, are at risk of recurrence, despite undergoing curative surgery, chemotherapy, and/or endocrine therapy. And so based on the data of ribociclib in the advanced breast cancer population, showing a phenomenal progression-free survival and overall survival with the addition of ribociclib to endocrine therapy, the NATALLEE trial sought to evaluate ribociclib in combination with nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors anastrozole and letrozole in stage II and III early breast cancer patients. And the reason was designed to try to see if we could further improve the outcomes of these patients to see if we could increase the cure rate for early stage breast cancer patients. The NATALEE trial randomized just over 5,100 patients to receive ribociclib at a dose of 400 milligrams given three weeks on one week off for 36 months with the NSAI of anastrozole-letrozole as compared to those agents alone. The primary endpoint of the trial was invasive disease-free survival, and the trial has presented data at prior meetings and showed the invasive disease-free survival. That interim and final analysis did demonstrate a benefit in favor of the arm having the ribociclib, and it was statistically significant and meaningful. I think one of the questions arises that the trial nicely included high-risk select node-negative patients in addition to the node-positive patients. And those node negative patients also demonstrated benefit. The trial did exclude low-risk node-negative patients. Those were the T1N0s, but did include the T2N0, T3 and T4N0 patients. The T2N0 or our anatomic stage IIA patients had to have additional high-risk features, either grade III histology or grade II histology with a high risk from a genomic stratifying assay. And what we were able to demonstrate is that in the node negative high risk population that received ribociclib, in addition to their NSI, they also demonstrated and benefit in the invasive disease-free survival. And for the endpoints that are important in terms of distant disease-free survival, those benefits were consistent in both the DDFS and the DRFS groups as well. And so I think the NATALEE trial stands to benefit a large population of early-stage breast cancer patients who are at risk of recurrence, namely those that are node-positive and the high-risk node-negative patients. The safety profile is very tolerable and demonstrates just neutropenia, elevated liver function tests. Interestingly, arthralgias, which are common to the NSAI group, were reduced in the group that received ribociclib in combination. And so when we see a safety profile such as demonstrated with the NATALEE trial matched with improvement in invasive disease-free survival for the intent-to-treat population as well as the node-negative population, I think we can see now where this has implications for general practice. What we can see is that we have at least one CDK4/6 in the setting in node-positive patients only. Ribociclib, through the NATALEE trial, encompassed both node-positive and select high-risk node-negative patients. So I think we can see that there's a large group of patients that are at risk of recurrence that have every reason to expect a risk reduction with the addition of ribociclib without any untoward safety signals other than what we know for those agents alone. And that just further improves and hopefully translates into improve survival for those patients. We only have the invasive disease-free survival at this point. But I think now looking at adjuvant endocrine strategies for this population, we do see ribociclib added to adjuvant endocrine therapy of nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors, improving the invasive disease-free survival and further increasing the magnitude of benefit for both populations at risk, the high-risk node-negative and the hormone receptor-positive.

Related Videos

Multiple Myeloma

Thierry Facon, MD, on Multiple Myeloma: Results From the IMROZ Study on Isatuximab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone

Thierry Facon, MD, of the University of Lille and Lille University Hospital, discusses phase III findings showing for the first time that isatuximab, an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, when given with the standard of care (bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone, or VRd) to patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are transplant-ineligible, may reduce the risk of disease progression or death by 40.4% vs VRd alone (Abstract 7500).

Gynecologic Cancers

Yukio Suzuki, MD, PhD, on Endometrial Cancer: Long-Term Survival Outcomes With Hormonal Therapy in Reproductive-Age Patients

Yukio Suzuki, MD, PhD, of Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, discusses data showing that reproductive-age patients with early-stage endometrial cancer who use fertility-preserving hormonal therapy seemed to have good overall survival after a 10-year follow-up (Abstract 5508).

Lung Cancer

Minesh P. Mehta, MD, on NSCLC: Tumor Treating Fields for Brain Metastases

Minesh P. Mehta, MD, of Miami Cancer Institute, part of Baptist Health South Florida, discusses results from the METIS (EF-25) trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of tumor treating fields therapy following stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with mutation-negative non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases. Tumor treating fields therapy prolongs time to intracranial disease progression and may postpone whole-brain radiation therapy without declines in quality of life and cognition (Abstract 2008).

Gastroesophageal Cancer

Jens Marquardt, MD, and Jens Hoeppner, MD, on Esophageal Cancer: Phase III Findings on Chemotherapy vs Chemoradiation

Jens Marquardt, MD, of the University of Lübeck, and Jens Hoeppner, MD, of the University of Bielefeld, discuss findings from the ESOPEC trial, which showed that perioperative chemotherapy (fluorouracii, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, docetaxel) and surgery improves survival in patients with resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma when compared with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (41.4 Gy plus carboplatin and paclitaxel) followed by surgery (LBA1).

Prostate Cancer

Anthony M. Joshua, MBBS, PhD, on Low-Risk Prostate Cancer and Metformin: New Trial Data

Anthony M. Joshua, MBBS, PhD, of Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, discusses results from the MAST study, which explored the question of whether metformin could reduce disease progression in men with low-risk prostate cancer who are undergoing active surveillance (LBA5002).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement