Advertisement


Denise A. Yardley, MD, on Early Breast Cancer: Findings From the NATALEE Trial on Patients With Node-Negative Disease

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Denise A. Yardley, MD, of the Sarah Cannon Research Institute, discusses the NATALEE trial, which assessed ribociclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) vs an NSAI alone in patients with hormone receptor–positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer at increased risk of recurrence, including patients with node-negative disease, and showed a benefit in invasive disease–free survival (Abstract 512).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer, unfortunately, are at risk of recurrence, despite undergoing curative surgery, chemotherapy, and/or endocrine therapy. And so based on the data of ribociclib in the advanced breast cancer population, showing a phenomenal progression-free survival and overall survival with the addition of ribociclib to endocrine therapy, the NATALLEE trial sought to evaluate ribociclib in combination with nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors anastrozole and letrozole in stage II and III early breast cancer patients. And the reason was designed to try to see if we could further improve the outcomes of these patients to see if we could increase the cure rate for early stage breast cancer patients. The NATALEE trial randomized just over 5,100 patients to receive ribociclib at a dose of 400 milligrams given three weeks on one week off for 36 months with the NSAI of anastrozole-letrozole as compared to those agents alone. The primary endpoint of the trial was invasive disease-free survival, and the trial has presented data at prior meetings and showed the invasive disease-free survival. That interim and final analysis did demonstrate a benefit in favor of the arm having the ribociclib, and it was statistically significant and meaningful. I think one of the questions arises that the trial nicely included high-risk select node-negative patients in addition to the node-positive patients. And those node negative patients also demonstrated benefit. The trial did exclude low-risk node-negative patients. Those were the T1N0s, but did include the T2N0, T3 and T4N0 patients. The T2N0 or our anatomic stage IIA patients had to have additional high-risk features, either grade III histology or grade II histology with a high risk from a genomic stratifying assay. And what we were able to demonstrate is that in the node negative high risk population that received ribociclib, in addition to their NSI, they also demonstrated and benefit in the invasive disease-free survival. And for the endpoints that are important in terms of distant disease-free survival, those benefits were consistent in both the DDFS and the DRFS groups as well. And so I think the NATALEE trial stands to benefit a large population of early-stage breast cancer patients who are at risk of recurrence, namely those that are node-positive and the high-risk node-negative patients. The safety profile is very tolerable and demonstrates just neutropenia, elevated liver function tests. Interestingly, arthralgias, which are common to the NSAI group, were reduced in the group that received ribociclib in combination. And so when we see a safety profile such as demonstrated with the NATALEE trial matched with improvement in invasive disease-free survival for the intent-to-treat population as well as the node-negative population, I think we can see now where this has implications for general practice. What we can see is that we have at least one CDK4/6 in the setting in node-positive patients only. Ribociclib, through the NATALEE trial, encompassed both node-positive and select high-risk node-negative patients. So I think we can see that there's a large group of patients that are at risk of recurrence that have every reason to expect a risk reduction with the addition of ribociclib without any untoward safety signals other than what we know for those agents alone. And that just further improves and hopefully translates into improve survival for those patients. We only have the invasive disease-free survival at this point. But I think now looking at adjuvant endocrine strategies for this population, we do see ribociclib added to adjuvant endocrine therapy of nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors, improving the invasive disease-free survival and further increasing the magnitude of benefit for both populations at risk, the high-risk node-negative and the hormone receptor-positive.

Related Videos

Leukemia
Immunotherapy

Allison M. Winter, MD, on Richter Transformation: New Data on a CAR T-Cell Treatment

Allison M. Winter, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, discusses real-world outcomes with lisocabtagene maraleucel in patients with Richter transformation, a difficult-to-treat population with a poor prognosis. Data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research showed this therapy provided clinical benefit with a high complete response rate (Abstract 7010).

Kidney Cancer

Toni K. Choueiri, MD, FASCO, on RCC: Biomarker Analysis From the CLEAR Trial

Toni K. Choueiri, MD, FASCO, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses phase III findings showing that, in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the benefit of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab vs sunitinib in overall response rate does not appear to be affected by such factors as geneexpression signatures for tumorinduced proliferation, PDL1 status, or the mutation status of RCC driver genes.

Issues in Oncology

Andrew Srisuwananukorn, MD, and Alexander T. Pearson, MD, PhD, on Artificial Intelligence in the Clinic: Understanding How to Use This 21st Century Tool

Andrew Srisuwananukorn, MD, of The Ohio State University, and Alexander T. Pearson, MD, PhD, of the University of Chicago, discuss the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the clinic, its potential benefits in diagnosis and treatment, resources available to help physicians learn more about AI, and what’s coming for the next generation of medical school students.

Breast Cancer

Lisa A. Carey, MD, and Dejan Juric, MD, on Breast Cancer: Updates From the INAVO120 Trial

Lisa A. Carey, MD, of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Dejan Juric, MD, of the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, discuss phase III findings on first-line use of inavolisib or placebo plus palbociclib and fulvestrant in patients with PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who relapsed within 12 months of completing adjuvant endocrine therapy (Abstract 1003).

Lymphoma

Peter Riedell, MD, on DLBCL: Expert Commentary on the DEB Study

Peter Riedell, MD, of The University of Chicago, discusses phase III results on the use of tucidinostat plus R-CHOP in patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with double expression of MYC and BCL2. The regimen appeared to improve event-free survival and complete response rates vs R-CHOP in the front-line setting. As this is an interim analysis, longer-term follow-up will be needed to better understand its impact, says Dr. Riedell.

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement