Advertisement

Allison M. Winter, MD, on Richter Transformation: New Data on a CAR T-Cell Treatment
0 seconds of 0 secondsVolume 90%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
Keyboard Shortcuts
Play/PauseSPACE
Increase Volume
Decrease Volume
Seek Forward
Seek Backward
Captions On/Offc
Fullscreen/Exit Fullscreenf
Mute/Unmutem
Decrease Caption Size-
Increase Caption Size+ or =
Seek %0-9
00:00
00:00
00:00
 

Allison M. Winter, MD, on Richter Transformation: New Data on a CAR T-Cell Treatment

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Allison M. Winter, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, discusses real-world outcomes with lisocabtagene maraleucel in patients with Richter transformation, a difficult-to-treat population with a poor prognosis. Data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research showed this therapy provided clinical benefit with a high complete response rate (Abstract 7010).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Richter's Transformation is a feared complication of patients with CLL. It happens in a minority up to 1% of patients, but it's associated with poor outcomes with a historical median overall survival anywhere from three to 12 months. We looked at the use of lysis cell as a commercial infusion just for patients with Richter's Transformation using data from the CIBMTR. The data included 30 patients who received a single infusion of lysis cell commercially, who had at least six months of follow-up until the data cut off of February 2023. We looked at outcome measurements, as well as previous lines of therapy and safety data. It's important to note that many of these patients were high risk. Some of the features that made them high risk included things like 77% of patients had prior therapy for their CLL, prior to the Richter Transformation event. 90% of these were large B-cell lymphoma histologies. All patients received therapy, obviously for their Richter Transformation before they received their infusion of lysis cell. It's important to note that 83% were refractory to their last line of therapy prior to their lysis cell infusion. Many of these patients had prior therapies with novel agents including BTK inhibitors, BCL-II inhibitors, and even chemoimmunotherapy. Some patients were even dual class exposed to both BCL-II inhibitors and BTKI inhibitors. Two patients even had active CNS disease at the time of the lysis cell infusion. For the patients who had the one-time infusion of lysis cell, 76% was the overall response rate with 66% CR's. And this was a pretty quick response. Most patients had a response by 1.1 months. Of those patients who did have a response and had duration of response data available, 77% had a 12-month duration of response. When we look at the outcomes in more depth, we see that the median progression free survival was not reached. At six months, it was estimated at 65%. And at 12 months, 54%. All patients had survival data available. The six-month overall survival was 79%. And at 12 months estimated at 67%. It's important to look at safety in these CAR T-cell products, especially in this real world setting. 70% of patients had cytokine release syndrome, but thankfully grade three or higher was low in just 7% of patients. 47% did experience ICANNs, but again, the grade three and higher was lower at 27%. So this is, again, a multi-center real world data set from the CIBMTR, looking at lysis cell infusion commercially. Showing high response rates in long, durable responses in this high risk, difficult to treat Richter's Transformation population. We recognize that larger cohorts and longer follow-up is required to really characterize lysis cell in the future in this population.

Related Videos

Kidney Cancer

Toni K. Choueiri, MD, FASCO, on RCC: Biomarker Analysis From the CLEAR Trial

Toni K. Choueiri, MD, FASCO, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses phase III findings showing that, in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the benefit of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab vs sunitinib in overall response rate does not appear to be affected by such factors as geneexpression signatures for tumorinduced proliferation, PDL1 status, or the mutation status of RCC driver genes.

Breast Cancer

Eva M. Ciruelos, MD, PhD, on HER2-Positive and PAM50 Luminal Breast Cancer: Primary Results From the PATRICIA Trial

Eva M. Ciruelos, MD, PhD, of Spain’s Hospital 12 de Octubre and the Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre, discusses phase II data showing that the combination of palbociclib, trastuzumab, and endocrine therapy improved progression-free survival in patients with previously treated PAM50 luminal A or B, HER2-positive advanced breast cancer, as compared with treatment of physicians’ choice (Abstract 1008).

Breast Cancer

Emily L. Podany, MD, on Metastatic Breast Cancer: Racial Differences in Genomic Profiles and Targeted Treatment Use

Emily L. Podany, MD, of Washington University, St. Louis, discusses disparities in the use of PI3K inhibitors for Black patients with estrogen receptor–positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer while other drugs that do not require genomic profiling were similarly used (Abstract 1017). 

Gynecologic Cancers

Mostafa Eyada, MD, on Oral Cyclophosphamide Plus Bevacizumab in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

Mostafa Eyada, MD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses study results showing that bevacizumab in combination with oral cyclophosphamide had a response rate of 40% in patients with recurrent platinum-resistant high-grade ovarian cancer (Abstract 5517).

Lymphoma

Peter Riedell, MD, on DLBCL: Expert Commentary on Data From the ECHELON-3 Study

Peter Riedell, MD, of The University of Chicago, discusses phase III findings on the regimen of brentuximab vedotin in combination with lenalidomide and rituximab for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This therapy demonstrated a survival advantage in the third-line setting, but as this is an interim analysis, questions remain regarding long-term safety and duration of response, according to Dr. Riedell (Abstract LBA7005).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement