Advertisement


Allison M. Winter, MD, on Richter Transformation: New Data on a CAR T-Cell Treatment

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Allison M. Winter, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, discusses real-world outcomes with lisocabtagene maraleucel in patients with Richter transformation, a difficult-to-treat population with a poor prognosis. Data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research showed this therapy provided clinical benefit with a high complete response rate (Abstract 7010).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Richter's Transformation is a feared complication of patients with CLL. It happens in a minority up to 1% of patients, but it's associated with poor outcomes with a historical median overall survival anywhere from three to 12 months. We looked at the use of lysis cell as a commercial infusion just for patients with Richter's Transformation using data from the CIBMTR. The data included 30 patients who received a single infusion of lysis cell commercially, who had at least six months of follow-up until the data cut off of February 2023. We looked at outcome measurements, as well as previous lines of therapy and safety data. It's important to note that many of these patients were high risk. Some of the features that made them high risk included things like 77% of patients had prior therapy for their CLL, prior to the Richter Transformation event. 90% of these were large B-cell lymphoma histologies. All patients received therapy, obviously for their Richter Transformation before they received their infusion of lysis cell. It's important to note that 83% were refractory to their last line of therapy prior to their lysis cell infusion. Many of these patients had prior therapies with novel agents including BTK inhibitors, BCL-II inhibitors, and even chemoimmunotherapy. Some patients were even dual class exposed to both BCL-II inhibitors and BTKI inhibitors. Two patients even had active CNS disease at the time of the lysis cell infusion. For the patients who had the one-time infusion of lysis cell, 76% was the overall response rate with 66% CR's. And this was a pretty quick response. Most patients had a response by 1.1 months. Of those patients who did have a response and had duration of response data available, 77% had a 12-month duration of response. When we look at the outcomes in more depth, we see that the median progression free survival was not reached. At six months, it was estimated at 65%. And at 12 months, 54%. All patients had survival data available. The six-month overall survival was 79%. And at 12 months estimated at 67%. It's important to look at safety in these CAR T-cell products, especially in this real world setting. 70% of patients had cytokine release syndrome, but thankfully grade three or higher was low in just 7% of patients. 47% did experience ICANNs, but again, the grade three and higher was lower at 27%. So this is, again, a multi-center real world data set from the CIBMTR, looking at lysis cell infusion commercially. Showing high response rates in long, durable responses in this high risk, difficult to treat Richter's Transformation population. We recognize that larger cohorts and longer follow-up is required to really characterize lysis cell in the future in this population.

Related Videos

Palliative Care

Joseph A. Greer, PhD, on Lung Cancer: Telehealth vs In-Person Palliative Care

Joseph A. Greer, PhD, of Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, discusses study findings showing the merits of delivering early palliative care via telehealth vs in person to patients with advanced lung cancer. Using telemedicine in this way may potentially improve access to and more broadly disseminate this evidence-based care model (LBA3).

Breast Cancer

Lisa A. Carey, MD, and Kevin Kalinsky, MD, on Advanced Breast Cancer: New Data on Abemaciclib and Fulvestrant From the postMONARCH Trial

Lisa A. Carey, MD, of University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Kevin Kalinsky, MD, of the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, discuss the first phase III findings showing a benefit of continued CDK4/6 inhibition with abemaciclib plus fulvestrant, following disease progression in patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (LBA1001).

Lung Cancer

Minesh P. Mehta, MD, on NSCLC: Tumor Treating Fields for Brain Metastases

Minesh P. Mehta, MD, of Miami Cancer Institute, part of Baptist Health South Florida, discusses results from the METIS (EF-25) trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of tumor treating fields therapy following stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with mutation-negative non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases. Tumor treating fields therapy prolongs time to intracranial disease progression and may postpone whole-brain radiation therapy without declines in quality of life and cognition (Abstract 2008).

Leukemia
Lymphoma

Muhit Özcan, MD, on CLL/SLL: Report on a Still-Recruiting International Study of Nemtabrutinib, Venetoclax, and Rituximab

Muhit Özcan, MD, of Turkey’s Ankara University School of Medicine, discusses the ongoing phase III BELLWAVE-010 study of nemtabrutinib plus venetoclax vs venetoclax plus rituximab in previously treated patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) (Abstract TPS7089).  

Lymphoma

Peter Riedell, MD, on DLBCL: Expert Commentary on the DEB Study

Peter Riedell, MD, of The University of Chicago, discusses phase III results on the use of tucidinostat plus R-CHOP in patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with double expression of MYC and BCL2. The regimen appeared to improve event-free survival and complete response rates vs R-CHOP in the front-line setting. As this is an interim analysis, longer-term follow-up will be needed to better understand its impact, says Dr. Riedell.

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement