Advertisement


Allison M. Winter, MD, on Richter Transformation: New Data on a CAR T-Cell Treatment

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Allison M. Winter, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, discusses real-world outcomes with lisocabtagene maraleucel in patients with Richter transformation, a difficult-to-treat population with a poor prognosis. Data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research showed this therapy provided clinical benefit with a high complete response rate (Abstract 7010).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Richter's Transformation is a feared complication of patients with CLL. It happens in a minority up to 1% of patients, but it's associated with poor outcomes with a historical median overall survival anywhere from three to 12 months. We looked at the use of lysis cell as a commercial infusion just for patients with Richter's Transformation using data from the CIBMTR. The data included 30 patients who received a single infusion of lysis cell commercially, who had at least six months of follow-up until the data cut off of February 2023. We looked at outcome measurements, as well as previous lines of therapy and safety data. It's important to note that many of these patients were high risk. Some of the features that made them high risk included things like 77% of patients had prior therapy for their CLL, prior to the Richter Transformation event. 90% of these were large B-cell lymphoma histologies. All patients received therapy, obviously for their Richter Transformation before they received their infusion of lysis cell. It's important to note that 83% were refractory to their last line of therapy prior to their lysis cell infusion. Many of these patients had prior therapies with novel agents including BTK inhibitors, BCL-II inhibitors, and even chemoimmunotherapy. Some patients were even dual class exposed to both BCL-II inhibitors and BTKI inhibitors. Two patients even had active CNS disease at the time of the lysis cell infusion. For the patients who had the one-time infusion of lysis cell, 76% was the overall response rate with 66% CR's. And this was a pretty quick response. Most patients had a response by 1.1 months. Of those patients who did have a response and had duration of response data available, 77% had a 12-month duration of response. When we look at the outcomes in more depth, we see that the median progression free survival was not reached. At six months, it was estimated at 65%. And at 12 months, 54%. All patients had survival data available. The six-month overall survival was 79%. And at 12 months estimated at 67%. It's important to look at safety in these CAR T-cell products, especially in this real world setting. 70% of patients had cytokine release syndrome, but thankfully grade three or higher was low in just 7% of patients. 47% did experience ICANNs, but again, the grade three and higher was lower at 27%. So this is, again, a multi-center real world data set from the CIBMTR, looking at lysis cell infusion commercially. Showing high response rates in long, durable responses in this high risk, difficult to treat Richter's Transformation population. We recognize that larger cohorts and longer follow-up is required to really characterize lysis cell in the future in this population.

Related Videos

Gynecologic Cancers

Katherine C. Fuh, MD, PhD, on Ovarian Cancer: New Data on Batiraxcept and Paclitaxel

Katherine C. Fuh, MD, PhD, of the University of California, San Francisco, discusses phase III findings of the AXLerate-OC trial, showing that batiraxcept with paclitaxel compared to paclitaxel alone improved progression-free and overall survival in patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer whose tumors were AXL-high in an exploratory analysis (LBA5515).

Breast Cancer

Ana C. Garrido-Castro, MD, on Managing Metastatic Breast Cancer in 2024

Ana C. Garrido-Castro, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses recent approvals of multiple novel therapies for metastatic breast cancer, weighing their potential benefits and risks, understanding the mechanisms that drive response and resistance, and exploring how to optimally sequence them to enhance survival and quality of life.

Breast Cancer

Milana Bergamino Sirvén, MD, PhD, on HER2-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Molecular Profiling, Prognosis, and Treatment Options

Milana Bergamino Sirvén, MD, PhD, of Spain’s Institute of Cancer Research, discusses her findings on molecular profiling of patients with estrogen receptor–positive, HER2-positive early-stage breast tumors after short-term preoperative endocrine therapy. This study suggests that such profiling may help clinicians identify those patients with a favorable prognosis for adjuvant endocrine therapy and those who may require additional treatment (Abstract 560).

Kidney Cancer

Toni K. Choueiri, MD, FASCO, on RCC: Biomarker Analysis From the CLEAR Trial

Toni K. Choueiri, MD, FASCO, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses phase III findings showing that, in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the benefit of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab vs sunitinib in overall response rate does not appear to be affected by such factors as geneexpression signatures for tumorinduced proliferation, PDL1 status, or the mutation status of RCC driver genes.

Breast Cancer

Reshma Jagsi, MD, DPhil, and Tarah J. Ballinger, MD, on Early-Stage Breast Cancer in Black Women: Docetaxel and Peripheral Neuropathy

Reshma Jagsi, MD, DPhil, of Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, and Tarah J. Ballinger, MD, of Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, discuss the disparate burden of taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy in Black women with early-stage breast cancer and how a tailored trial for this population showed that using docetaxel as the preferred taxane may be beneficial (LBA503).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement