Advertisement


Allison M. Winter, MD, on Richter Transformation: New Data on a CAR T-Cell Treatment

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Allison M. Winter, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, discusses real-world outcomes with lisocabtagene maraleucel in patients with Richter transformation, a difficult-to-treat population with a poor prognosis. Data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research showed this therapy provided clinical benefit with a high complete response rate (Abstract 7010).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Richter's Transformation is a feared complication of patients with CLL. It happens in a minority up to 1% of patients, but it's associated with poor outcomes with a historical median overall survival anywhere from three to 12 months. We looked at the use of lysis cell as a commercial infusion just for patients with Richter's Transformation using data from the CIBMTR. The data included 30 patients who received a single infusion of lysis cell commercially, who had at least six months of follow-up until the data cut off of February 2023. We looked at outcome measurements, as well as previous lines of therapy and safety data. It's important to note that many of these patients were high risk. Some of the features that made them high risk included things like 77% of patients had prior therapy for their CLL, prior to the Richter Transformation event. 90% of these were large B-cell lymphoma histologies. All patients received therapy, obviously for their Richter Transformation before they received their infusion of lysis cell. It's important to note that 83% were refractory to their last line of therapy prior to their lysis cell infusion. Many of these patients had prior therapies with novel agents including BTK inhibitors, BCL-II inhibitors, and even chemoimmunotherapy. Some patients were even dual class exposed to both BCL-II inhibitors and BTKI inhibitors. Two patients even had active CNS disease at the time of the lysis cell infusion. For the patients who had the one-time infusion of lysis cell, 76% was the overall response rate with 66% CR's. And this was a pretty quick response. Most patients had a response by 1.1 months. Of those patients who did have a response and had duration of response data available, 77% had a 12-month duration of response. When we look at the outcomes in more depth, we see that the median progression free survival was not reached. At six months, it was estimated at 65%. And at 12 months, 54%. All patients had survival data available. The six-month overall survival was 79%. And at 12 months estimated at 67%. It's important to look at safety in these CAR T-cell products, especially in this real world setting. 70% of patients had cytokine release syndrome, but thankfully grade three or higher was low in just 7% of patients. 47% did experience ICANNs, but again, the grade three and higher was lower at 27%. So this is, again, a multi-center real world data set from the CIBMTR, looking at lysis cell infusion commercially. Showing high response rates in long, durable responses in this high risk, difficult to treat Richter's Transformation population. We recognize that larger cohorts and longer follow-up is required to really characterize lysis cell in the future in this population.

Related Videos

Breast Cancer

Yeon Hee Park, MD, PhD, on Metastatic Breast Cancer: Updated Survival Results of the Young-PEARL Study

Yeon Hee Park, MD, PhD, of South Korea’s Samsung Medical Center and Sungkyunkwan University, discusses phase II findings on palbociclib plus exemestane with a GnRH agonist vs capecitabine in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (LBA1002).

Lymphoma

Peter Riedell, MD, on DLBCL: Expert Commentary on Data From the ECHELON-3 Study

Peter Riedell, MD, of The University of Chicago, discusses phase III findings on the regimen of brentuximab vedotin in combination with lenalidomide and rituximab for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This therapy demonstrated a survival advantage in the third-line setting, but as this is an interim analysis, questions remain regarding long-term safety and duration of response, according to Dr. Riedell (Abstract LBA7005).

Lymphoma

Joshua D. Brody, MD, on Follicular Lymphoma: New Data on Epcoritamab, Rituximab, and Lenalidomide

Joshua D. Brody, MD, of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, discusses results from the EPCORE NHL-2 study, which was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of epcoritamab-bysp plus rituximab and lenalidomide in the first-line setting for patients with follicular lymphoma and to assess epcoritamab as maintenance therapy in this population (Abstract 7014).

Lung Cancer

Tomasz Jankowski, MD, PhD, on Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: New Data on a Telomere-Targeting Agent

Tomasz Jankowski, MD, PhD, of Poland’s Medical University in Lublin, discusses a phase II study of THIO, a telomere-targeting agent followed by cemiplimab-rwlc for a difficult-to-treat population of patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (Abstract 8601).

Skin Cancer

Christian U. Blank, MD, PhD, on Melanoma: Potentially Practice-Changing Results From the NADINA Trial

Christian U. Blank, MD, PhD, of the Netherlands Cancer Institute, discusses findings of an investigator-initiated phase III trial showing that neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab followed by response-driven adjuvant treatment improved event-free survival in patients with macroscopic, resectable stage III melanoma compared with adjuvant nivolumab (LBA2)

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement