Advertisement


Allison M. Winter, MD, on Richter Transformation: New Data on a CAR T-Cell Treatment

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Allison M. Winter, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, discusses real-world outcomes with lisocabtagene maraleucel in patients with Richter transformation, a difficult-to-treat population with a poor prognosis. Data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research showed this therapy provided clinical benefit with a high complete response rate (Abstract 7010).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Richter's Transformation is a feared complication of patients with CLL. It happens in a minority up to 1% of patients, but it's associated with poor outcomes with a historical median overall survival anywhere from three to 12 months. We looked at the use of lysis cell as a commercial infusion just for patients with Richter's Transformation using data from the CIBMTR. The data included 30 patients who received a single infusion of lysis cell commercially, who had at least six months of follow-up until the data cut off of February 2023. We looked at outcome measurements, as well as previous lines of therapy and safety data. It's important to note that many of these patients were high risk. Some of the features that made them high risk included things like 77% of patients had prior therapy for their CLL, prior to the Richter Transformation event. 90% of these were large B-cell lymphoma histologies. All patients received therapy, obviously for their Richter Transformation before they received their infusion of lysis cell. It's important to note that 83% were refractory to their last line of therapy prior to their lysis cell infusion. Many of these patients had prior therapies with novel agents including BTK inhibitors, BCL-II inhibitors, and even chemoimmunotherapy. Some patients were even dual class exposed to both BCL-II inhibitors and BTKI inhibitors. Two patients even had active CNS disease at the time of the lysis cell infusion. For the patients who had the one-time infusion of lysis cell, 76% was the overall response rate with 66% CR's. And this was a pretty quick response. Most patients had a response by 1.1 months. Of those patients who did have a response and had duration of response data available, 77% had a 12-month duration of response. When we look at the outcomes in more depth, we see that the median progression free survival was not reached. At six months, it was estimated at 65%. And at 12 months, 54%. All patients had survival data available. The six-month overall survival was 79%. And at 12 months estimated at 67%. It's important to look at safety in these CAR T-cell products, especially in this real world setting. 70% of patients had cytokine release syndrome, but thankfully grade three or higher was low in just 7% of patients. 47% did experience ICANNs, but again, the grade three and higher was lower at 27%. So this is, again, a multi-center real world data set from the CIBMTR, looking at lysis cell infusion commercially. Showing high response rates in long, durable responses in this high risk, difficult to treat Richter's Transformation population. We recognize that larger cohorts and longer follow-up is required to really characterize lysis cell in the future in this population.

Related Videos

Gynecologic Cancers

Jean-Marc Classe, MD, PhD, on Ovarian Cancer: New Data on Lymphadenectomy From the CARACO Trial

Jean-Marc Classe, MD, PhD, of France’s Nantes Université, discusses phase III results showing that systematic lymphadenectomy should be omitted in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer with clinically negative lymph nodes, as well as those undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval complete surgery (LBA5505).

Breast Cancer

Fabrice Andre, MD, PhD, on Breast Cancer: Interim Analysis From DESTINY-Breast07

Fabrice Andre, MD, PhD, of Gustave Roussy and the Université Paris-Saclay, discusses a dose-expansion interim analysis of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) monotherapy and T-DXd plus pertuzumab in patients with previously untreated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (Abstract 1009).

Kidney Cancer

Toni K. Choueiri, MD, FASCO, on RCC: Biomarker Analysis From the CLEAR Trial

Toni K. Choueiri, MD, FASCO, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses phase III findings showing that, in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the benefit of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab vs sunitinib in overall response rate does not appear to be affected by such factors as geneexpression signatures for tumorinduced proliferation, PDL1 status, or the mutation status of RCC driver genes.

Bladder Cancer

Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, and Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, on Urothelial Carcinoma: Expert Commentary on Two Key Abstracts

Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, of Barts Cancer Institute and the University of London, discuss phase III findings from two studies: the first, investigating enfortumab vedotin-ejfv and pembrolizumab vs platinum-based chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer; and the second, looking at nivolumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin vs gemcitabine and cisplatin alone in patients with lymph node–only metastatic disease enrolled in the CheckMate 901 trial (Abstracts 4581 and 4565).

Palliative Care

Joseph A. Greer, PhD, on Lung Cancer: Telehealth vs In-Person Palliative Care

Joseph A. Greer, PhD, of Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, discusses study findings showing the merits of delivering early palliative care via telehealth vs in person to patients with advanced lung cancer. Using telemedicine in this way may potentially improve access to and more broadly disseminate this evidence-based care model (LBA3).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement