Advertisement


Nirav N. Shah, MD, on Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Follow-up Data on Pirtobrutinib in Pretreated Disease

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Nirav N. Shah, MD, of the Medical College of Wisconsin, discusses the efficacy and safety of pirtobrutinib, a highly selective, noncovalent BTK inhibitor, studied for more than 3 years in the BRUIN trial. The results showed that the use of pirtobrutinib continues to have durable efficacy and a favorable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma and prior BTK inhibitor therapy. Responses were observed in patients with high-risk disease features, including blastoid/pleomorphic variants, elevated Ki67 index, and TP53 mutations (Abstract 7514).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Nirav N. Shah: So mantle cell lymphoma is a disease that sort of is felt to be a relapsing remitting disease, which means that most patients are going to relapse in their lifetime. Now, while we have very, very good therapies for relapse mantle cell, which generally include covalent BTK inhibitors. For those patients who progress after covalent BTK inhibitors, options are limited. We have treatments like CAR T-cell therapy, but not all patients are healthy enough, fit enough, or are in an area where CAR T-cell therapy is accessible. So pirtobrutinib was studied as part of the BRUIN trial to look specifically at patients with B-cell malignancies. And the data being reported is looking at the cohort of patients with mantle cell lymphoma who received this drug in a relapsed refractory setting. Unlike other BTK inhibitors pirtobrutinib is a non-covalent reversible inhibitor showing that it has a different mechanism of action than the BTK inhibitors that are currently being used in the second line setting. As part of the BRUIN study, whether or not you had prior BTK exposure was not an exclusion, and so actually the majority of patients who received pirtobrutinib, 90 of them, actually had prior BTK exposure, which is an unmet need in mantle cell lymphoma. Despite seeing a different BTK inhibitor, first, the overall response rate with pirtobrutinib was 58% in this heavily pretreated group, which is really just exciting to have another oral agent be effective in that patient population. Not only was it effective, but there were also durable responses. And so now in this sort of two year long term follow-up, we know that the median duration of response for those patients who were responding to therapy was 18 months, and the median overall survival was nearly 2 years. This data actually led to this drug now being FDA approved and in this clinical setting and available, and part of that is because the safety profile that's demonstrated in the BRUIN study in this patient population was actually quite favorable. The toxicities were low and the traditional BTK toxicities, things like atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and bleeding were actually seen at very low rates, such that may occur actually in a general patient population. In conclusion, I think that pirtobrutinib represents a novel mechanism of action in inhibiting the BTK pathway and allowing patients that have failed other covalent BTK inhibitors to continue receiving an oral medication that has now shown incredible efficacy, safety, and durability.

Related Videos

Lymphoma

Catherine C. Coombs, MD, on B-Cell Malignancies and Long-Term Safety of Pirtobrutinib

Catherine C. Coombs, MD, of the University of California, Irvine, discusses prolonged pirtobrutinib therapy, which continues to demonstrate a safety profile amenable to long-term administration at the recommended dose without evidence of new or worsening toxicity signals. The safety and tolerability observed in patients on therapy for 12 months or more were similar to previously published safety analyses of all patients enrolled, regardless of follow-up (Abstract 7513).

Gynecologic Cancers
Immunotherapy

Bobbie J. Rimel, MD, Isabelle L. Ray-Coquard, MD, PhD, on Cervical Squamous Carcinoma: Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab

Bobbie J. Rimel, MD, of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, and Isabelle L. Ray-Coquard, MD, PhD, of Centre Léon Bérard and the University Claude Bernard Lyon Est, discuss findings from the COLIBRI trial, which showed that, for patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma, neoadjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab is safe and orchestrates de novo immune responses. The 82.5% complete response rate for primary tumors 6 months after standard chemoradiation therapy suggests favorable clinical outcomes (Abstract 5501). 

Lung Cancer
Genomics/Genetics

Narjust Florez, MD, and Ferdinandos Skoulidis, MD, PhD, on NSCLC: Findings on Sotorasib vs Docetaxel in the CodeBreaK 200 Trial

Narjust Florez, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Ferdinandos Skoulidis, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discuss results of a biomarker subgroup analysis, showing that sotorasib demonstrated consistent clinical benefit vs docetaxel in all molecularly defined subgroups of patients with pretreated KRAS G12C–mutated advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although no predictive biomarkers were confirmed, novel hypothesis-generating signals were observed (Abstract 9008).

Solid Tumors

Funda Meric-Bernstam, MD, on HER2-Expressing Solid Tumors: Efficacy and Safety of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan

Funda Meric-Bernstam, MD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses interim results from the DESTINY-PanTumor02 trial, the first tumor-agnostic global study of fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki (T-DXd) in a broad range of HER2-expressing solid tumors. This agent showed an encouraging overall response rate, particularly in patients with IHC 3+ expression; durable clinical benefit; and a manageable safety profile in these heavily pretreated patients. T-DXd may be a potential new treatment option for this population (Abstract LBA3000).

Leukemia
COVID-19

Jennifer A. Woyach, MD, on New Findings on CLL, COVID-19, and Treatment With Obinutuzumab Plus Venetoclax

Jennifer A. Woyach, MD, of The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses results of a phase III study showing that progression-free survival with ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab plus venetoclax is not superior to ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab for treatment-naive older patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic. Long-term follow-up will determine whether there are advantages to obinutuzumab plus venetoclax, with special attention to measurable residual disease and therapy discontinuation (Abstract 7500).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement