Advertisement


Nirav N. Shah, MD, on Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Follow-up Data on Pirtobrutinib in Pretreated Disease

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Nirav N. Shah, MD, of the Medical College of Wisconsin, discusses the efficacy and safety of pirtobrutinib, a highly selective, noncovalent BTK inhibitor, studied for more than 3 years in the BRUIN trial. The results showed that the use of pirtobrutinib continues to have durable efficacy and a favorable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma and prior BTK inhibitor therapy. Responses were observed in patients with high-risk disease features, including blastoid/pleomorphic variants, elevated Ki67 index, and TP53 mutations (Abstract 7514).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Nirav N. Shah: So mantle cell lymphoma is a disease that sort of is felt to be a relapsing remitting disease, which means that most patients are going to relapse in their lifetime. Now, while we have very, very good therapies for relapse mantle cell, which generally include covalent BTK inhibitors. For those patients who progress after covalent BTK inhibitors, options are limited. We have treatments like CAR T-cell therapy, but not all patients are healthy enough, fit enough, or are in an area where CAR T-cell therapy is accessible. So pirtobrutinib was studied as part of the BRUIN trial to look specifically at patients with B-cell malignancies. And the data being reported is looking at the cohort of patients with mantle cell lymphoma who received this drug in a relapsed refractory setting. Unlike other BTK inhibitors pirtobrutinib is a non-covalent reversible inhibitor showing that it has a different mechanism of action than the BTK inhibitors that are currently being used in the second line setting. As part of the BRUIN study, whether or not you had prior BTK exposure was not an exclusion, and so actually the majority of patients who received pirtobrutinib, 90 of them, actually had prior BTK exposure, which is an unmet need in mantle cell lymphoma. Despite seeing a different BTK inhibitor, first, the overall response rate with pirtobrutinib was 58% in this heavily pretreated group, which is really just exciting to have another oral agent be effective in that patient population. Not only was it effective, but there were also durable responses. And so now in this sort of two year long term follow-up, we know that the median duration of response for those patients who were responding to therapy was 18 months, and the median overall survival was nearly 2 years. This data actually led to this drug now being FDA approved and in this clinical setting and available, and part of that is because the safety profile that's demonstrated in the BRUIN study in this patient population was actually quite favorable. The toxicities were low and the traditional BTK toxicities, things like atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and bleeding were actually seen at very low rates, such that may occur actually in a general patient population. In conclusion, I think that pirtobrutinib represents a novel mechanism of action in inhibiting the BTK pathway and allowing patients that have failed other covalent BTK inhibitors to continue receiving an oral medication that has now shown incredible efficacy, safety, and durability.

Related Videos

Kidney Cancer

Thomas E. Hutson, DO, PharmD, on RCC: Overall Survival Analysis of Lenvatinib, Pembrolizumab, and Sunitinib

Thomas E. Hutson, DO, PharmD, of Texas Oncology, discusses the 4-year follow-up results from the CLEAR study for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The data showed that lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab continues to demonstrate clinically meaningful benefit vs sunitinib in overall and progression-free survival, as well as in overall and complete response rates, in first-line treatment (Abstract 4502).

Lung Cancer

Nagla Abdel Karim, MD, on Small Cell Lung Cancer: SWOG S1929 Results on Atezolizumab Plus Talazoparib

Nagla Abdel Karim, MD, of the Inova Schar Cancer Institute, University of Virginia, discusses phase II data showing that maintenance atezolizumab plus talazoparib improved progression-free survival in Schlafen-11–selected patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. This study demonstrated the feasibility of conducting biomarker-selected trials in this disease, paving the way for future evaluation of novel therapies in selected populations (Abstract 8504).

Skin Cancer
Immunotherapy

Shailender Bhatia, MD, on Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Results From CheckMate 358 on Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab

Shailender Bhatia, MD, of the University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, discusses phase I/II results on the efficacy of nivolumab with or without ipilimumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma. The study found that, for this rare and aggressive skin cancer, nivolumab showed clinical activity in advanced disease. However, these results from CheckMate 358 do not suggest an additional benefit with ipilimumab added to nivolumab (Abstract 9506).

 

Gynecologic Cancers

Marie Plante, MD, on Cervical Cancer: New Data on Hysterectomy and Pelvic Node Dissection

Marie Plante, MD, of Canada’s Université Laval and the CHUQ Hotel Dieu de Québec, discusses phase III results from a study that compared radical hysterectomy and pelvic node dissection vs simple hysterectomy and pelvic node dissection in patients with low-risk early-stage cervical cancer. The pelvic recurrence rate at 3 years in the women who underwent simple hysterectomy is not inferior to those who had radical hysterectomy. In addition, fewer surgical complications and better quality of life were observed with simple hysterectomy (LBA5511).

Kidney Cancer

Rana R. McKay, MD, and Toni K. Choueiri, MD, on RCC: New Findings on Efficacy and Safety of Atezolizumab Plus Cabozantinib

Rana R. McKay, MD, of the University of California, San Diego, and Toni K. Choueiri, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, discuss results from the phase III CONTACT-03 study, showing that, for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), adding the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab to cabozantinib did not improve clinical outcomes compared with treatment with cabozantinib alone. In addition, higher toxicities were observed in the combination arm (Abstract LBA4500).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement