Advertisement


Nirav N. Shah, MD, on Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Follow-up Data on Pirtobrutinib in Pretreated Disease

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Nirav N. Shah, MD, of the Medical College of Wisconsin, discusses the efficacy and safety of pirtobrutinib, a highly selective, noncovalent BTK inhibitor, studied for more than 3 years in the BRUIN trial. The results showed that the use of pirtobrutinib continues to have durable efficacy and a favorable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma and prior BTK inhibitor therapy. Responses were observed in patients with high-risk disease features, including blastoid/pleomorphic variants, elevated Ki67 index, and TP53 mutations (Abstract 7514).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Nirav N. Shah: So mantle cell lymphoma is a disease that sort of is felt to be a relapsing remitting disease, which means that most patients are going to relapse in their lifetime. Now, while we have very, very good therapies for relapse mantle cell, which generally include covalent BTK inhibitors. For those patients who progress after covalent BTK inhibitors, options are limited. We have treatments like CAR T-cell therapy, but not all patients are healthy enough, fit enough, or are in an area where CAR T-cell therapy is accessible. So pirtobrutinib was studied as part of the BRUIN trial to look specifically at patients with B-cell malignancies. And the data being reported is looking at the cohort of patients with mantle cell lymphoma who received this drug in a relapsed refractory setting. Unlike other BTK inhibitors pirtobrutinib is a non-covalent reversible inhibitor showing that it has a different mechanism of action than the BTK inhibitors that are currently being used in the second line setting. As part of the BRUIN study, whether or not you had prior BTK exposure was not an exclusion, and so actually the majority of patients who received pirtobrutinib, 90 of them, actually had prior BTK exposure, which is an unmet need in mantle cell lymphoma. Despite seeing a different BTK inhibitor, first, the overall response rate with pirtobrutinib was 58% in this heavily pretreated group, which is really just exciting to have another oral agent be effective in that patient population. Not only was it effective, but there were also durable responses. And so now in this sort of two year long term follow-up, we know that the median duration of response for those patients who were responding to therapy was 18 months, and the median overall survival was nearly 2 years. This data actually led to this drug now being FDA approved and in this clinical setting and available, and part of that is because the safety profile that's demonstrated in the BRUIN study in this patient population was actually quite favorable. The toxicities were low and the traditional BTK toxicities, things like atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and bleeding were actually seen at very low rates, such that may occur actually in a general patient population. In conclusion, I think that pirtobrutinib represents a novel mechanism of action in inhibiting the BTK pathway and allowing patients that have failed other covalent BTK inhibitors to continue receiving an oral medication that has now shown incredible efficacy, safety, and durability.

Related Videos

Lung Cancer

Narjust Florez, MD, and Filippo Gustavo Dall’Olio, MD, on NSCLC: New Findings on Tumor Fraction, Durvalumab, and Survival

Narjust Florez, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Filippo Gustavo Dall’Olio, MD, of Institut Gustave Roussy, discuss circulating tumor DNA tumor fraction, and its link to survival in patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with maintenance durvalumab in the UNICANCER SAFIR02-Lung/IFCT1301 trial. Tumor fraction was positive in 16% of patients randomly assigned to receive durvalumab in the study. This population seems to have a limited benefit from maintenance durvalumab after induction chemotherapy (Abstract 2516).

Global Cancer Care
Leukemia

Paula Aristizabal, MD, MAS, on Surviving Childhood Leukemia Near the Border of the United States and Mexico

Paula Aristizabal, MD, MAS, of the University of California, San Diego, and Rady Children’s Hospital, talks about using a health systems strengthening approach to improve leukemia care and survival in a public Mexican hospital in the region of the border between the United States and Mexico. The demonstrated increase in overall survival across a decade after implementation of the program seems to validate the use of such models, not only to improve clinical outcomes, but also to build sustainable hospital capacity, financially and organizationally (Abstract 1502).

Bladder Cancer

Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke, MD, on Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: New Data on Erdafitinib and Cetrelimab From the NORSE Study

Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke, MD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses the combination of erdafitinib and cetrelimab, which demonstrated clinically meaningful activity and was well tolerated in cisplatin-ineligible patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma and fibroblast growth factor receptor alterations (Abstract 4504).

Prostate Cancer

Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, and Karim Fizazi, MD, on Prostate Cancer: Phase III Results on Talazoparib Plus Enzalutamide as First-Line Treatment

Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Karim Fizazi, MD, of Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris-Saclay, discuss findings from the TALAPRO-2 study, which showed that talazoparib plus enzalutamide improved radiographic progression–free survival over standard-of-care enzalutamide as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and HRR gene alterations. This regimen also delayed the time to deterioration in global health status and quality of life (Abstract 5004).

Leukemia
COVID-19

Jennifer A. Woyach, MD, on New Findings on CLL, COVID-19, and Treatment With Obinutuzumab Plus Venetoclax

Jennifer A. Woyach, MD, of The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses results of a phase III study showing that progression-free survival with ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab plus venetoclax is not superior to ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab for treatment-naive older patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic. Long-term follow-up will determine whether there are advantages to obinutuzumab plus venetoclax, with special attention to measurable residual disease and therapy discontinuation (Abstract 7500).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement