Advertisement


LaQuisa C. Hill, MD, on Relapsed or Refractory T-ALL: New Data on CD5 CAR T Cells

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

LaQuisa C. Hill, MD, of Baylor College of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, discusses study findings showing that CD5 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells may induce clinical responses in heavily treated patients with relapsed or refractory T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Manufacturing CD5 CAR T cells with tyrosine kinase inhibitors seemed to improve their potency and antitumor activity (Abstract 7002).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
LaQuisa C. Hill, MD: The purpose of this study was a phase one clinical trial that was a dose escalation study using autologous CD5 CAR T for treatment of patients with relapse/ refractory T-cell ALL. In the initial cohort, we used our standard manufacturing practice that was overall very well-tolerated. However, in the eight patients initially treated, there were minimal responses seen with only one patient achieving a MRD positive remission. We subsequently analyzed the cell products and determined that the CAR T cells had a significantly exhausted phenotype as a result of chronic CAR signaling. Therefore, we implemented a manufacturing change to include the use of TKI inhibitors dasatinib and ibrutinib in order to inhibit the chronic CAR signaling and saw a significant improvement in the naive T-cell repertoire and significant reduction in the number of exhausted T-cells in the final product. In the next cohort, we treated a total of seven patients, all manufactured using the TKI inhibition. And amongst those patients there was a total of four MRD negative remissions achieved out of seven patients treated. The CAR T cell was well-tolerated in terms of CRS and ICANS. No grade-three events occurred. However, there was an increased risk of, or observation of, EBV reactivation with two patients developing PTLD. Currently it is unclear of the direct relationship to the CD5 CAR T cells manufactured with TKI. However, we plan to continue vigilant monitoring for this unexpected side effect and have instituted mitigation plans utilizing prophylactic rituximab as well as ensuring that patients have EBV-specific virus T cells available in the event that EBV reactivation occurs. Moving forward, we will continue to try and optimize the CAR T cell product both for efficacy and safety and are looking into alternative immune effector subsets, such as virus-specific T cells as the immune factor cell of choice, as well as considering use of third-party or off-the-shelf T cells from healthy donors.

Related Videos

Bladder Cancer

Enrique Grande, MD, on Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Updated Data From IMvigor130

Enrique Grande, MD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses new findings that show initial responses to induction therapy with atezolizumab plus platinum and gemcitabine did not seem to impact overall survival for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Cisplatin-treated patients appeared to derive a greater benefit with atezolizumab than did carboplatin-treated patients (Abstract 4503).

Ajay K. Nooka, MBBS, on High-Risk Myeloma: Data on Carfilzomib, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone

Ajay K. Nooka, MBBS, of Winship Cancer Center of Emory University, discusses phase II findings showing that, in patients with high-risk myeloma, maintenance therapy with carfilzomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone deepened responses. Measurable residual disease negativity was attained in 80% of patients.

Kidney Cancer

Rana R. McKay, MD, and Toni K. Choueiri, MD, on RCC: New Findings on Efficacy and Safety of Atezolizumab Plus Cabozantinib

Rana R. McKay, MD, of the University of California, San Diego, and Toni K. Choueiri, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, discuss results from the phase III CONTACT-03 study, showing that, for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), adding the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab to cabozantinib did not improve clinical outcomes compared with treatment with cabozantinib alone. In addition, higher toxicities were observed in the combination arm (Abstract LBA4500).

Kidney Cancer

Thomas E. Hutson, DO, PharmD, on RCC: Overall Survival Analysis of Lenvatinib, Pembrolizumab, and Sunitinib

Thomas E. Hutson, DO, PharmD, of Texas Oncology, discusses the 4-year follow-up results from the CLEAR study for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The data showed that lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab continues to demonstrate clinically meaningful benefit vs sunitinib in overall and progression-free survival, as well as in overall and complete response rates, in first-line treatment (Abstract 4502).

Colorectal Cancer

Cathy Eng, MD, and Lars Henrik Jensen, MD, PhD, on Locally Advanced Colon Cancer: Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Standard Treatment

Cathy Eng, MD, of Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, and Lars Henrik Jensen, MD, PhD, of the Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South and the University Hospital of Southern Denmark, discuss phase III results from the Scandinavian NeoCol trial, which showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not superior to standard upfront surgery in terms of disease-free and overall survival in patients with colon cancer, although there are certain circumstances when this approach may have more favorable outcomes (Abstract LBA3503).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement