Advertisement


Amer Methqal Zeidan, MBBS, MHS, on Myelodysplastic Syndromes: New Data From the IMerge Study of Imetelstat

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Amer Methqal Zeidan, MBBS, MHS, of Yale University and Yale Cancer Center, discusses phase III findings on the first-in-class telomerase inhibitor imetelstat, which was given to patients with heavily transfusion-dependent non-del(5q) lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes that are resistant to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Imetelstat resulted in a significant and sustained red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence in 40% of these heavily transfused patients. The response was also durable and accompanied by an impressive median hemoglobin rise of 3.6 g/dL, and seen in patients with and without ring sideroblasts. Importantly, reduced variant allele frequency was observed in the most commonly mutated myeloid genes which correlated with duration of transfusion independence and hemoglobin rise, therefore suggesting a disease-modifying potential of this agent (Abstract 7004).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Amer Merthql Zeidan, MBBS, MHS: The IMerge was randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study looking at the use of imetelstat versus placebo in patients with lower-risk MDS who were heavily transfusion-dependent after ESA failure, or for patients who are unlikely to respond to ESAs. Imetelstat is a first-in-class direct competitive inhibitor of the telomerase. And preclinical data, as well as early phase-II data suggested very good activity in patients who are transfusion dependent with lower risk MDS. So, the Imerge study was conducted to look at this in a randomized setting where 178 patients who had lower risk MDS by the IPSS with low or intermediate-1 risk groups basically were randomized to receive imetelstat at the standard dose, which is 7.5 milligram per kilogram intravenously every four weeks, or to get a placebo. Those patients had to have more than four units of blood at baseline every eight weeks, so they were very heavily transfusion-dependent. And actually the median transfusion dependency was six units, basically, every eight weeks. The primary endpoint of the study was eight-week transfusion independence. But there were a number of other secondary endpoints that looked at the durability as well as the potential disease modification effect of imetelstat. What we observed in the study is that the study met its primary endpoint. The rate of transfusion independence at eight weeks, basically, for patients who were on the study was 40% with imetelstat, compared to 15% with placebo. And importantly, this was durable, so the median duration of transfusion independence for responders was 52 weeks, compared to 13 weeks. And I think one of the most impressive findings in the study is that the median hemoglobin rise for patients who received imetelstat and responded was 3.6 gram per deciliter. So, those patients went from 8 to more than 11 grams per deciliter of hemoglobin. And this is a very good, impressive rise. It was durable. And as I mentioned, those patients were very heavily transfusion-dependent at baseline. The median transfusion dependency was six units per eight weeks. What we also observed is that there was evidence of disease modification, and that was seen through the reduction in the viable allele frequency of the most commonly mutated genes in patients with MDS, including SF3B1, which also correlated with the duration of transfusion independence and the rise in the hemoglobin. In terms of the side effects, they were expected, along the lines of what we have seen in the phase II. There were basically cytopenias and the cytopenias, however, did not lead to increase in the severe clinical consequences, such as grade 3 or higher bleeding infections or febrile neutropenia. Generally, it was manageable by dose reduction and dose modification interruption. And there were also non-hematologic toxicities, but most of those were lower grade, grade 1 and 2, and also generally reversible by dose modification. So, in general, I think this is a very good option that is leading to sustained and significant increase in the hemoglobin and transfusion independence among lower-risk patients with MDS who had not responded or stopped responding to ESAs, and I hope it's going to be one good option for our patients.

Related Videos

Bladder Cancer
Immunotherapy

Shilpa Gupta, MD, on Urothelial Carcinoma: Long-Term Outcome of Enfortumab Vedotin Plus Pembrolizumab

Shilpa Gupta, MD, of Cleveland Clinic, discusses the results from the EV-103 study and the unmet need for effective first-line therapies in cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. After nearly 4 years of follow-up, the trial findings showed that enfortumab vedotin-ejfv plus pembrolizumab continues to demonstrate promising survival trends with rapid and durable responses in this population (Abstract 4505).

Lung Cancer

Penelope Bradbury, MBChB, on Pleural Mesothelioma: New Results From the IND227 Trial of Cisplatin and Pemetrexed With or Without Pembrolizumab

Penelope Bradbury, MBChB, of Canada’s Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, discusses phase III findings showing that, in patients with treatment-naive unresectable pleural mesothelioma, cisplatin and pemetrexed with pembrolizumab improved median overall survival with acceptable tolerability (Abstract LBA8505).

Prostate Cancer

Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, and Karim Fizazi, MD, on Prostate Cancer: Phase III Results on Talazoparib Plus Enzalutamide as First-Line Treatment

Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Karim Fizazi, MD, of Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris-Saclay, discuss findings from the TALAPRO-2 study, which showed that talazoparib plus enzalutamide improved radiographic progression–free survival over standard-of-care enzalutamide as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and HRR gene alterations. This regimen also delayed the time to deterioration in global health status and quality of life (Abstract 5004).

Colorectal Cancer

Cathy Eng, MD, and Thejus Jayakrishnan, MD, on Colorectal Cancer: Metabolomic Differences in Young-Onset vs Average-Onset Disease

Cathy Eng, MD, of Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, and Thejus Jayakrishnan, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, discuss significant differences in the citrate cycle, a core pathway of cellular metabolism associated with colorectal cancer. Metabolomic differences impacted by environmental exposures (arginine biosynthesis and dietary red meat) were also noted, suggesting possible links with younger age of onset in this disease (Abstract 3510).

Prostate Cancer

Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, and Praful Ravi, MRCP, MBBChir, on Localized Prostate Cancer: Prognostic Impact of PSA Nadir

Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, and Praful Ravi, MRCP, MBBChir, both of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discuss an individual patient-data analysis of randomized trials from the ICECAP collaborative. A PSA nadir of ≥ 0.1 ng/mL within 6 months after radiotherapy completion was prognostic for prostate cancer–specific, metastasis-free, and overall survival in patients receiving radiotherapy plus androgen-deprivation therapy for localized prostate cancer. These findings may help identify patients for therapy de-escalation trials (Abstract 5002).

Advertisement

Advertisement



Advertisement