Advertisement


Alberto Bossi, MD, on Prostate Cancer: PEACE-1 Trial Findings on Radiotherapy Plus Systemic Treatment

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Alberto Bossi, MD, of Institut Gustave Roussy, discusses phase III findings showing that combining prostate radiotherapy with systemic treatment did not improve overall survival in men with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer and low metastatic burden. However, best outcomes (radiographic progression–free-survival and overall survival) were observed in men receiving the standard of care plus abiraterone acetate plus prednisone with radiotherapy (Abstract LBA5000).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Alberto Bossi, MD: PEACE-1 is a randomized Phase III trial with four arms that has been designed some 11 years ago in order to study a very precise population of patients, which is patients presenting de novo of diagnosis with metastatic prostate cancer. There has been a huge landscape movement in the last years concerning this subgroup of patients and PEACE-1 has specifically been designed to answer two questions. First of all, the benefit of abiraterone on top of standard of care, and second, to detect if any benefit of local radiotherapy, prostate radiotherapy would be important for those patients, so two questions, four arms. Standard of care has been updated during the inclusion period of the study because we had some new evidence coming from the literature, and so the use of chemotherapy, docetaxel, has been at first introduced and compulsory at the end of the trial, four arms, so that have been compared and two main endpoints, radiographic progression-free survival and overall survival. Then a list of secondary endpoints, which we also discuss. What we discovered, in terms of overall survival, no difference between the use of local radiotherapy in those patients, both in the low volume population so patients presenting with low volume metastatic disease as in the high volume population, patients presenting with high burden of metastatic disease, no impact of radiotherapy. But using radiotherapy translates in a better radiographic progression-free survival, which was the second co-primary endpoint. We then had a list of secondary endpoints and we made studies on three of them. First, castration resistant state, and we discovered that giving radiotherapy in the prostate on those patients delays the onset of the castration resistant state, and this in a significant way. And second, that also in terms of secondary events locally in the prostate, radiotherapy may delay the need of a secondary treatment for those patients. Altogether, I think that in terms of quality of life for our patients these are very important outcomes. What's next? Well, first we have to dig into those data with much more details. There are still some open questions there. You are probably aware of the result of the STAMPEDE trial, the English trial which has exactly done the same as our trial and that has shown an improvement in overall survival, why our data do not show the same, so this is something we will try to dig later on. And secondary, there are a list of other endpoints which we also will try to study more details. The secondary endpoints are also important, especially in terms of quality of life for our patients. What is reassuring, and this is the end, what is reassuring is that no added toxicity was due to radiotherapy in the prostate and I think that this is very good and reassuring information for our patients and their family.

Related Videos

Issues in Oncology

Carmen E. Guerra, MD, MSCE, on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Clinical Trials: Expert Commentary

Carmen E. Guerra, MD, MSCE, of the University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center, discusses three key abstracts presented at ASCO: strategies to increase accrual of underrepresented populations in Alliance NCTN trials, how patient-clinician education can strengthen partnerships and improve diversity in breast and lung cancer trials, and mediators of racial and ethnic inequities in clinical trial participation among U.S. patients with cancer from 2011 to 2022 (Abstracts 6509, 6510, 6511).

Gynecologic Cancers

Bobbie J. Rimel, MD, and Mansoor R. Mirza, MD, on Endometrial Cancer: Patient-Reported Outcomes With Dostarlimab, Carboplatin, and Paclitaxel

Bobbie J. Rimel, MD, of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, and Mansoor R. Mirza, MD, of Denmark’s Rigshospitalet and Copenhagen University Hospital, discuss new findings on dostarlimab-gxly plus carboplatin/paclitaxel, which improved progression-free survival while maintaining health-related quality of life, further supporting its use as a standard of care in primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (Abstract 5504).

Lymphoma

Manali K. Kamdar, MD, on Primary Refractory and Early Relapsing DLBCL: Therapeutic Options

Manali K. Kamdar, MD, of University of Colorado Hospital, discusses the treatment landscape for the 30% to 40% of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) whose disease will relapse. Patients who experience relapse within 1 year of chemoimmunotherapy have poor outcomes with autotransplantation, but chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy has shown efficacy and manageable toxicity.

Lymphoma

Jennifer L. Crombie, MD, on DLBCL: Real-World Outcomes With Novel Therapies in Relapsed or Refractory Disease

Jennifer L. Crombie, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses the historically poor outcomes for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Her study examined real-world data on the use of novel therapies in this population and found that outcomes with second- and third-line regimens of polatuzumab vedotin-piiq plus bendamustine and rituximab and tafasitamab plus lenalidomide remain suboptimal, with worse outcomes particularly after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (Abstract 7552).

CNS Cancers

Lisa M. DeAngelis, MD, and Ingo K. Mellinghoff, MD, on Glioma: Phase III Results on Vorasidenib

Lisa M. DeAngelis, MD, and Ingo K. Mellinghoff, MD, both of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, discuss findings from the INDIGO trial showing that the IDH1/2 inhibitor vorasidenib improves progression-free survival for patients with residual or recurrent grade 2 glioma with an IDH1/2 mutation. These data demonstrate the clinical benefit of vorasidenib in this patient population for whom chemotherapy and radiotherapy are being delayed.

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement