Advertisement


Alberto Bossi, MD, on Prostate Cancer: PEACE-1 Trial Findings on Radiotherapy Plus Systemic Treatment

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Alberto Bossi, MD, of Institut Gustave Roussy, discusses phase III findings showing that combining prostate radiotherapy with systemic treatment did not improve overall survival in men with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer and low metastatic burden. However, best outcomes (radiographic progression–free-survival and overall survival) were observed in men receiving the standard of care plus abiraterone acetate plus prednisone with radiotherapy (Abstract LBA5000).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Alberto Bossi, MD: PEACE-1 is a randomized Phase III trial with four arms that has been designed some 11 years ago in order to study a very precise population of patients, which is patients presenting de novo of diagnosis with metastatic prostate cancer. There has been a huge landscape movement in the last years concerning this subgroup of patients and PEACE-1 has specifically been designed to answer two questions. First of all, the benefit of abiraterone on top of standard of care, and second, to detect if any benefit of local radiotherapy, prostate radiotherapy would be important for those patients, so two questions, four arms. Standard of care has been updated during the inclusion period of the study because we had some new evidence coming from the literature, and so the use of chemotherapy, docetaxel, has been at first introduced and compulsory at the end of the trial, four arms, so that have been compared and two main endpoints, radiographic progression-free survival and overall survival. Then a list of secondary endpoints, which we also discuss. What we discovered, in terms of overall survival, no difference between the use of local radiotherapy in those patients, both in the low volume population so patients presenting with low volume metastatic disease as in the high volume population, patients presenting with high burden of metastatic disease, no impact of radiotherapy. But using radiotherapy translates in a better radiographic progression-free survival, which was the second co-primary endpoint. We then had a list of secondary endpoints and we made studies on three of them. First, castration resistant state, and we discovered that giving radiotherapy in the prostate on those patients delays the onset of the castration resistant state, and this in a significant way. And second, that also in terms of secondary events locally in the prostate, radiotherapy may delay the need of a secondary treatment for those patients. Altogether, I think that in terms of quality of life for our patients these are very important outcomes. What's next? Well, first we have to dig into those data with much more details. There are still some open questions there. You are probably aware of the result of the STAMPEDE trial, the English trial which has exactly done the same as our trial and that has shown an improvement in overall survival, why our data do not show the same, so this is something we will try to dig later on. And secondary, there are a list of other endpoints which we also will try to study more details. The secondary endpoints are also important, especially in terms of quality of life for our patients. What is reassuring, and this is the end, what is reassuring is that no added toxicity was due to radiotherapy in the prostate and I think that this is very good and reassuring information for our patients and their family.

Related Videos

Lymphoma

Catherine C. Coombs, MD, on B-Cell Malignancies and Long-Term Safety of Pirtobrutinib

Catherine C. Coombs, MD, of the University of California, Irvine, discusses prolonged pirtobrutinib therapy, which continues to demonstrate a safety profile amenable to long-term administration at the recommended dose without evidence of new or worsening toxicity signals. The safety and tolerability observed in patients on therapy for 12 months or more were similar to previously published safety analyses of all patients enrolled, regardless of follow-up (Abstract 7513).

Breast Cancer

Jennifer A. Ligibel, MD, on Early Breast Cancer and Weight Loss: Results From the BWEL Trial

Jennifer A. Ligibel, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses a telephone-based weight loss intervention that induced clinically meaningful weight loss in patients with breast cancer who had overweight and obesity, across demographic and tumor factors. Additional tailoring of the intervention may possibly enhance weight loss in Black and younger patients as well (Abstract 12001).

Lung Cancer

Narjust Florez, MD, and Ticiana Leal, MD, on Metastatic NSCLC: Tumor Treating Fields Therapy After Platinum Resistance

Narjust Florez, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Ticiana Leal, MD, of Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, discuss the use of tumor treating fields therapy, in which electric fields disrupt processes critical for cancer cell viability. Already approved by the FDA to treat glioblastoma and mesothelioma, the treatment has extended overall survival in this phase III study of patients with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy, without exacerbating systemic toxicities (Abstract LBA9005).

Lymphoma

Jennifer L. Crombie, MD, on DLBCL: Real-World Outcomes With Novel Therapies in Relapsed or Refractory Disease

Jennifer L. Crombie, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses the historically poor outcomes for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Her study examined real-world data on the use of novel therapies in this population and found that outcomes with second- and third-line regimens of polatuzumab vedotin-piiq plus bendamustine and rituximab and tafasitamab plus lenalidomide remain suboptimal, with worse outcomes particularly after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (Abstract 7552).

Skin Cancer

Allison Betof Warner, MD, PhD, and Zeynep Eroglu, MD, on Metastatic Melanoma: New Data on Dabrafenib, Trametinib, and Navitoclax

Allison Betof Warner, MD, PhD, of Stanford University Medical Center, and Zeynep Eroglu, MD, of H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, discusses phase II findings showing that in patients with BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma, dabrafenib plus trametinib and navitoclax (DTN) was associated with a complete response rate of 20% and an overall response rate of 84%. Additionally, there was a trend toward improved overall survival in patients treated with DTN compared with dabrafenib plus trametinib alone; the difference in overall survival was more pronounced in patients with a smaller tumor burden (Abstract 9511).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement