Advertisement


Alberto Bossi, MD, on Prostate Cancer: PEACE-1 Trial Findings on Radiotherapy Plus Systemic Treatment

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Alberto Bossi, MD, of Institut Gustave Roussy, discusses phase III findings showing that combining prostate radiotherapy with systemic treatment did not improve overall survival in men with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer and low metastatic burden. However, best outcomes (radiographic progression–free-survival and overall survival) were observed in men receiving the standard of care plus abiraterone acetate plus prednisone with radiotherapy (Abstract LBA5000).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Alberto Bossi, MD: PEACE-1 is a randomized Phase III trial with four arms that has been designed some 11 years ago in order to study a very precise population of patients, which is patients presenting de novo of diagnosis with metastatic prostate cancer. There has been a huge landscape movement in the last years concerning this subgroup of patients and PEACE-1 has specifically been designed to answer two questions. First of all, the benefit of abiraterone on top of standard of care, and second, to detect if any benefit of local radiotherapy, prostate radiotherapy would be important for those patients, so two questions, four arms. Standard of care has been updated during the inclusion period of the study because we had some new evidence coming from the literature, and so the use of chemotherapy, docetaxel, has been at first introduced and compulsory at the end of the trial, four arms, so that have been compared and two main endpoints, radiographic progression-free survival and overall survival. Then a list of secondary endpoints, which we also discuss. What we discovered, in terms of overall survival, no difference between the use of local radiotherapy in those patients, both in the low volume population so patients presenting with low volume metastatic disease as in the high volume population, patients presenting with high burden of metastatic disease, no impact of radiotherapy. But using radiotherapy translates in a better radiographic progression-free survival, which was the second co-primary endpoint. We then had a list of secondary endpoints and we made studies on three of them. First, castration resistant state, and we discovered that giving radiotherapy in the prostate on those patients delays the onset of the castration resistant state, and this in a significant way. And second, that also in terms of secondary events locally in the prostate, radiotherapy may delay the need of a secondary treatment for those patients. Altogether, I think that in terms of quality of life for our patients these are very important outcomes. What's next? Well, first we have to dig into those data with much more details. There are still some open questions there. You are probably aware of the result of the STAMPEDE trial, the English trial which has exactly done the same as our trial and that has shown an improvement in overall survival, why our data do not show the same, so this is something we will try to dig later on. And secondary, there are a list of other endpoints which we also will try to study more details. The secondary endpoints are also important, especially in terms of quality of life for our patients. What is reassuring, and this is the end, what is reassuring is that no added toxicity was due to radiotherapy in the prostate and I think that this is very good and reassuring information for our patients and their family.

Related Videos

Bladder Cancer

Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke, MD, on Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: New Data on Erdafitinib and Cetrelimab From the NORSE Study

Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke, MD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses the combination of erdafitinib and cetrelimab, which demonstrated clinically meaningful activity and was well tolerated in cisplatin-ineligible patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma and fibroblast growth factor receptor alterations (Abstract 4504).

Skin Cancer
Immunotherapy

Georgina V. Long, MD, PhD, on Resected Melanoma: Biomarkers for and Efficacy of Adjuvant Nivolumab vs Placebo

Georgina V. Long, MD, PhD, of Melanoma Institute Australia and The University of Sydney, discusses new data showing that patients with resected stage IIB/C melanoma who were treated with adjuvant nivolumab had prolonged recurrence-free survival compared with placebo across all biomarker subgroups. The baseline biomarkers most predictive of prolonged recurrence-free survival with nivolumab were high interferon gamma score, high tumor mutational burden, CD8 T-cell infiltration, and low C-reactive protein (Abstract 9504).

Bladder Cancer

Christian Pfister, MD, PhD, on Bladder Cancer: New Overall Survival Data on Perioperative Chemotherapy

Christian Pfister, MD, PhD, of Rouen University Hospital, discusses phase III results from the VESPER trial, which showed that dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin provided a better overall survival rate at 5 years and improved disease-specific survival compared with gemcitabine as perioperative chemotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (Abstract LBA4507). 

Bladder Cancer
Immunotherapy

Shilpa Gupta, MD, on Urothelial Carcinoma: Long-Term Outcome of Enfortumab Vedotin Plus Pembrolizumab

Shilpa Gupta, MD, of Cleveland Clinic, discusses the results from the EV-103 study and the unmet need for effective first-line therapies in cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. After nearly 4 years of follow-up, the trial findings showed that enfortumab vedotin-ejfv plus pembrolizumab continues to demonstrate promising survival trends with rapid and durable responses in this population (Abstract 4505).

Gynecologic Cancers

Marie Plante, MD, on Cervical Cancer: New Data on Hysterectomy and Pelvic Node Dissection

Marie Plante, MD, of Canada’s Université Laval and the CHUQ Hotel Dieu de Québec, discusses phase III results from a study that compared radical hysterectomy and pelvic node dissection vs simple hysterectomy and pelvic node dissection in patients with low-risk early-stage cervical cancer. The pelvic recurrence rate at 3 years in the women who underwent simple hysterectomy is not inferior to those who had radical hysterectomy. In addition, fewer surgical complications and better quality of life were observed with simple hysterectomy (LBA5511).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement