Advertisement


Tomohiro Aoki, MD, PhD, on the Spatial Tumor Microenvironment and Outcome of Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma

2022 ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition

Advertisement

Tomohiro Aoki, MD, PhD, of the University of British Columbia and the Centre for Lymphoid Cancer at BC Cancer, discusses a novel prognostic model applicable to patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma who were treated with autologous stem cell transplantation. The model has shown the interaction between the biomarker CXCR5 on HRS cells (Hodgkin and Reed/Sternberg cells, hallmarks of Hodgkin lymphoma) with specific follicular T helper cells and macrophages, a prominent crosstalk axis in relapsed disease. This insight opens new avenues to developing predictive biomarkers (Abstract 71).

 



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Development of the spatially informed biomarker, that is the main goal of our study. Our study here is focusing on relapsed refractory Hodgkin lymphoma because, as you know, despite the recent treatment advancements, still about 20 to 30% of patients experience relapsed disease, and about half of them eventually succumb to their disease. Importantly, there's no biomarker we can utilize in daily clinical practice setting yet. So, our study goals are describing the tumor microbiome ecosystem for the relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma and develop some novel prognostic model for relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma. For these goals, we applied imaging mass cytometry, which enabled us to visualize more than 37 protein marker in the spatial context, and we applied IMC using the unique cohorts, which consist of 73 paired diagnostic and relapsed biopsy of Hodgkin lymphoma. Primary advantage of the imaging mass cytometry data is that we can capture the complex spatial information at single cell resolutions. To capture the complex information, we established the pipeline called spatial score, so that we can utilize the information for the biomarker development. First, we describe the unique contrast between early relapsed biopsy and relapse biopsy. In brief, we identified that early relapsed biopsy, in general, shares micro-environment patterns between diagnostic and relapsed biopsy. In contrast, where relapsed biopsy shows the significant difference between diagnostic and relapsed biopsies. Next, we sought to develop the micro-environments best prognostic model, using the spatial information. So first, using the best model and using amazing math rudimentary data, we identified the four variables which is significantly associated with the outcome in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma which includes CXCR5 positive HRS cells, CD4 positive T cells, macrophage and CXCR5 positive B cell population. Using those four variables, we have developed a novel prognostic model called RHL4S, which produced highly significant [inaudible 00:02:50] group in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma, in harmony, treated with high dose chemotherapy, followed by stem cell transplantation. We further identified the unique micro-environment patterns of the six certified positive HRS cells, which are spatially arranged together and form cell clusters. Their unique interactions with the six certified positive initial population, including macrophage and T cells. In summary, we have developed a novel prognostic model in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma and importantly, we have now opened up a new avenue of spatially informed biomarker. I believe that this new concept can be applicable to any of the cancer types, not limited to Hodgkin lymphoma. Now, we are verifying our findings and our ultimate goal is we can utilize those spatially informed biomarker in the daily clinical practice setting. Now we are translating our IMC data findings into the managed IT settings so that we can utilize the information into the daily clinical practice.

Related Videos

Leukemia

Elias Jabbour, MD, on CML and ALL: Olverembatinib Overcomes Ponatinib Resistance

Elias Jabbour, MD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses an analysis confirming that olverembatinib is a potentially viable treatment option for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia chromosome–positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), including those with CML whose disease did not respond to ponatinib or asciminib, or who had a T315I mutation (Abstract 82).

Leukemia

Jorge E. Cortes, MD, on CML: Efficacy and Safety of Vodobatinib

Jorge E. Cortes, MD, of Georgia Cancer Center at Augusta University, discusses new findings on vodobatinib, which was administered to patients with chronic-phase Philadelphia chromosome–positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and appeared to be efficacious and safe in people who had received therapy with two or three prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Vodobatinib remains a potential option for these highly refractory patients. A phase II study (NCT02629692) of vodobatinib is ongoing in CML patients whose disease has failed to respond to three or more TKIs, including ponatinib (Abstract 84).

Hematologic Malignancies
Immunotherapy

Joseph Schroers-Martin, MD, on Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorders: Tumor Microenvironment Determinants of Immunotherapy Response

Joseph Schroers-Martin, MD, of Stanford University, discusses immunogenomic features reflecting divergent biology in posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD). These include evidence of mismatch repair defects in Epstein-Barr virus–positive PTLD, tumor microenvironment depletion, and MYC pathway enrichment in certain patients (Abstract 72).

Leukemia

Anand P. Jillella, MD, on Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: A Simplified Patient Care Strategy to Decrease Early Deaths

Anand P. Jillella, MD, of Georgia Cancer Center at Augusta University, discusses results from the ECOG-ACRIN EA9131 Trial, which showed that using a simplified treatment algorithm and management recommendations made by a group of specialists, resulted in a dramatic improvement in 1-year survival of patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (Abstract 421).

Leukemia

Andrew Matthews, MD, on AML: Real-World Effectiveness of 7 + 3 Intensive Chemotherapy vs Venetoclax and a Hypomethylating Agent

Andrew Matthews, MD, of the Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, discusses findings from a large, multicenter study that showed superior outcomes with 7 + 3 chemotherapy (cytarabine continuously for 7 days, along with short infusions of an anthracycline on each of the first 3 days) vs venetoclax in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this real-world data set, the 7 + 3 cohort outperformed historical benchmarks in overall survival and early mortality, perhaps reflecting improved later lines of therapy and patient selection. Prospective studies (such as NCT04801797) must confirm the superiority of intensive chemotherapy (Abstract 426).

 

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement