Mark R. Litzow, MD, on ALL: Consolidation Therapy With Blinatumomab Improves Overall Survival
2022 ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition
Mark R. Litzow, MD, of the Mayo Clinic, discusses phase III results from the ECOG-ACRIN E1910 Trial, which show that adding blinatumomab to consolidation chemotherapy resulted in a significantly better overall survival in adult patients aged 30 to 70 years with newly diagnosed B-lineage acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) who were measurable residual disease–negative after receiving intensification chemotherapy. The authors believe this may represent a new standard of care for this population (Abstract LBA-1).
Transcript
Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Blinatumomab is a bispecific T-cell engager molecule that's been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for patients with relapsed and refractory B-lineage, acute lymphoblastic leukemia. And then more recently was approved for the treatment of patients who have measurable residual disease or MRD positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The aim of our study was to see if adding blinatumomab to chemotherapy had benefit for patients with MRD negative disease, who we overall think have a better prognosis. The design of the trial was to take patients between the ages of 30 and 70 with B-lineage ALL and newly diagnosed, and give them induction chemotherapy, standard chemotherapy, to get them into remission. Patients who achieved a conventional morphologic remission then had a cycle of intensification therapy to provide prophylaxis for their central nervous system. After that treatment, then they had a bone marrow biopsy and we assessed their MRD status by flow cytometry in a centralized lab.
And patients that were MRD negative at that point were then randomized to either get four cycles of consolidation chemotherapy, followed by one to two years of maintenance chemotherapy or get randomized to receive that same four cycles of chemotherapy, but also have four cycles of blinatumomab intertwined with the cycles of chemotherapy. Patients who are randomized to blinatumomab plus chemotherapy, received two monthly cycles of blinatumomab, recall that that's given by continuous infusion for four weeks. They then got several more cycles of the consolidation chemotherapy, then got another cycle of blinatumomab, then the fourth cycle of consolidation chemotherapy, and then another cycle of blinatumomab, and then went on to maintenance therapy.
And the goal of the study was to see if we could improve their overall survival. We enrolled 488 patients in the trial. 81% of those patients achieved a conventional morphologic complete remission. Some of them unfortunately relapsed shortly after that or had to be taken off study because of toxicity. But at the randomization for the MRD negative patients, we were able to randomize 224 patients, so 112 patients to each of the two arms, the chemotherapy alone or the chemotherapy plus blinatumomab.
And what we found was that the survival was much improved with blinatumomab and chemotherapy arm. And this was based on less relapses in that arm. Even though these patients are MRD negative, we know that they can still relapse and could still have residual disease. At three and a half years of follow up, the survival in blinatumomab plus chemotherapy arm was 83% versus 65% in the patients who got chemotherapy, and this was from the time of randomization.
We also showed a benefit for relapse-free survival as well. We're very excited about these results. We think they represent a new standard of care and that blinatumomab should be considered to be added to consolidation chemotherapy for patients for standard of care. We are discussing now how to build on these studies. We think that adding blinatumomab earlier in the treatment course may be beneficial, and there are studies that are beginning to look at that. We're also incorporating this into the other new modalities of therapy that you all are aware of, that are involved in the treatment of B-lineage ALL.
Related Videos
The ASCO Post Staff
Andrew Matthews, MD, of the Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, discusses findings from a large, multicenter study that showed superior outcomes with 7 + 3 chemotherapy (cytarabine continuously for 7 days, along with short infusions of an anthracycline on each of the first 3 days) vs venetoclax in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this real-world data set, the 7 + 3 cohort outperformed historical benchmarks in overall survival and early mortality, perhaps reflecting improved later lines of therapy and patient selection. Prospective studies (such as NCT04801797) must confirm the superiority of intensive chemotherapy (Abstract 426).
The ASCO Post Staff
Stephen M. Ansell, MD, PhD, and Patrizia Mondello, MD, PhD, both of the Mayo Clinic, discuss the 20% of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) who relapse early and experience a poor prognosis. The researchers found that FLs with high levels of IRF4 expression are associated with a suppressive tumor microenvironment, and selective IRF4 silencing restores antilymphoma T-cell immunity. Further investigation is warranted to identify the mechanisms by which IRF4 controls tumor immunity to develop precision therapies for this population (Abstract 70).
The ASCO Post Staff
Elias Jabbour, MD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses an analysis confirming that olverembatinib is a potentially viable treatment option for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia chromosome–positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), including those with CML whose disease did not respond to ponatinib or asciminib, or who had a T315I mutation (Abstract 82).
The ASCO Post Staff
Jennifer R. Brown, MD, PhD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses phase III findings of the ALPINE study, which showed that zanubrutinib is more efficacious and better tolerated than ibrutinib as a treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). In this first head-to-head comparison of the two BTK inhibitors, the superior progression-free survival of zanubrutinib was observed across all major subgroups, including high-risk patients (Abstract LBA-6).
The ASCO Post Staff
Joseph Schroers-Martin, MD, of Stanford University, discusses immunogenomic features reflecting divergent biology in posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD). These include evidence of mismatch repair defects in Epstein-Barr virus–positive PTLD, tumor microenvironment depletion, and MYC pathway enrichment in certain patients (Abstract 72).