Advertisement


Tycel J. Phillips, MD, on Mantle Cell Lymphoma: New Findings on Glofitamab Monotherapy

2022 ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition

Advertisement

Tycel J. Phillips, MD, of the City of Hope National Medical Center, discusses data that showed fixed-duration glofitamab monotherapy induced high and durable complete response rates in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who received obinutuzumab pretreatment. This is one of the largest data sets and longest follow-ups reported with a CD20/CD3 bispecific monoclonal antibody for patients with relapsed or refractory MCL (Abstract 74).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Historically, relapsed refractory mantle cell lymphoma has poor outcomes, especially those who are previously exposed to a BTK inhibitor. We have seen some changes in the landscape with the introduction of brexucabtagene autoleucel, which is sometimes hampered by toxicity and logistical challenges. Glofitamab is a bispecific antibody targeting CD20 and CD3 with two CD20 binding epitopes, which potentially provides a bit more potency compared to some of the other bispecific antibodies on the market. We previously presented data demonstrating the efficacy of this and acceptable mitigation strategy for CRS with step-up dosing. Additionally, in this study, we evaluated different pre-treatment doses of obinutuzumab, due to the competitive receptor occupancy binding of obinutuzumab and glofitamab, reducing further the risk of CRS, as well as with its rapid clearance not necessarily impacting clinical efficacy. In this study, we started off with obinutuzumab be either one or two grams on cycle one, day one, followed by glofitamab of cycle one, day eight at 2.5 milligrams; cycle one, day 15 at 10 milligrams; and cycle two, day one at 30 milligrams. Thereafter, glofitamab was given every three weeks at the 30 milligram dose for a total of 12 cycles. In this study, we enrolled patients with relapse refractory mantle cell lymphoma who received a median of three prior lines of therapy. Majority of the patients on the study were male patients, majority of the patients had advanced stage disease, a third of the patients had high risk MIPI, two thirds of the patients had prior exposure to a BTK inhibitor, and the majority of the patients were refractory to last line of therapy. In this study, what we saw was still high overall efficacy irrespective of the dose of obinutuzumab given as a pre-treatment, and this also correlated in the BTK refractory or exposed patient population. What we did also see is there was a higher overall response rate in those who received two grams of obinutuzumab and this also correlated into the BTK exposed patient population. If we look at duration of response, the duration of response on this study is a bit short compared to what we would see with the data with brexucabtagene autoleucel, but with a median follow up of a little less than a year we do see some durability of responses. We see some patients remain in remission even off of therapy, thus indicating that there's potentially for some durability of this treatment. If we look at patients with a complete remission, we see that 20 of 27 patients who obtained complete remission, still remain in remission on study. If we exclude four patients who came off treatment with CAR-T infections, we have 20 of 23 patients with a median duration of response not reached, indicating that there is substantial durability potential in this treatment response. Also, of note, all the patients who've completed 12 cycles of therapy have not yet have progressed on treatment at this current time. If we dive into the adverse events, the most common adverse event on treatment is cytokine release syndrome as we see the majority of our patients. The good thing with this treatment is we see the majority of this CRS events are grade one and grade two. We do have a scattered few of grade three and grade four CRS events. Some of the other events of note are neutropenia, tumor flare, elevation of AST and anemia, as well as we have a few neurological events that we will discuss later. Diving in deeper into the cytokine release syndrome, we see a lower percentage and frequency of CRS events with a two gram of obinutuzumab pre-treatment and there were no grade four CRS events noted with the two gram of obinutuzumab pre-treatment. All TRS events resolved on study treatment and none of these CRS events led to discontinuation irrespective of the amount of obinutuzumab given, whether it was one or two grams. If we dive into neurological complications, especially ICANS, there were five ICANS events on the study. Four which occurred in the one gram obinutuzumab pre-treatment and the one that occurred in the two gram obinutuzumab pre-treatment group was a great one ICANS event and did resolve on treatment. The other issues that we discussed are infection because of how this treatment works, we did see upper respiratory infection and some other infections specifically with COVID-19. There, specifically, were four COVID-19 related events and deaths on study treatment. One occurred after the adverse event reporting program, but overall, these necessarily did not lead to any sort of substantial impact or efficacy into what we see in this study treatment. Moving forward, we see that glofitamab monotherapy with obinutuzumab pre-treatment was effective in this patient population of relapsed refractory mantled cell lymphoma patients. As of today, the plan is to move forward with a randomized phase three study to get a better idea of the sense of efficacy, duration of response, and how this treatment responds in certain patient characteristics, which we will not able to collect on this study versus the standard of care. We will all look forward to seeing how this study plays out and where the glofitamab slots in in the treatment algorithm for patients with relapse refractory mantle cell lymphoma.

Related Videos

Leukemia
Genomics/Genetics

Irene Roberts, MD, on Leukemogenesis in Infants With Trisomy 21

Irene Roberts, MD, of Oxford’s Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, discusses children with Down syndrome, who have a more than 100-fold increased risk of developing acute myeloid leukemia before their fourth birthday compared to children without Down syndrome. Their risk of acute lymphoblastic leukemia is also increased by around 30-fold. Dr. Roberts details current knowledge about the biologic and molecular basis of this relationship between leukemia and Down syndrome, the role of trisomy 21 in leukemogenesis, and the clinical implications of these findings.

Lymphoma
Genomics/Genetics

Stephen M. Ansell, MD, PhD, and Patrizia Mondello, MD, PhD: New Findings on How the IRF4 Gene Shapes Tumor Immunity in Follicular Lymphoma

Stephen M. Ansell, MD, PhD, and Patrizia Mondello, MD, PhD, both of the Mayo Clinic, discuss the 20% of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) who relapse early and experience a poor prognosis. The researchers found that FLs with high levels of IRF4 expression are associated with a suppressive tumor microenvironment, and selective IRF4 silencing restores antilymphoma T-cell immunity. Further investigation is warranted to identify the mechanisms by which IRF4 controls tumor immunity to develop precision therapies for this population (Abstract 70).

Lymphoma

Tomohiro Aoki, MD, PhD, on the Spatial Tumor Microenvironment and Outcome of Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma

Tomohiro Aoki, MD, PhD, of the University of British Columbia and the Centre for Lymphoid Cancer at BC Cancer, discusses a novel prognostic model applicable to patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma who were treated with autologous stem cell transplantation. The model has shown the interaction between the biomarker CXCR5 on HRS cells (Hodgkin and Reed/Sternberg cells, hallmarks of Hodgkin lymphoma) with specific follicular T helper cells and macrophages, a prominent crosstalk axis in relapsed disease. This insight opens new avenues to developing predictive biomarkers (Abstract 71).

 

Leukemia

Andrew Matthews, MD, on AML: Real-World Effectiveness of 7 + 3 Intensive Chemotherapy vs Venetoclax and a Hypomethylating Agent

Andrew Matthews, MD, of the Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, discusses findings from a large, multicenter study that showed superior outcomes with 7 + 3 chemotherapy (cytarabine continuously for 7 days, along with short infusions of an anthracycline on each of the first 3 days) vs venetoclax in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this real-world data set, the 7 + 3 cohort outperformed historical benchmarks in overall survival and early mortality, perhaps reflecting improved later lines of therapy and patient selection. Prospective studies (such as NCT04801797) must confirm the superiority of intensive chemotherapy (Abstract 426).

 

Lymphoma

Eva Hoster, PhD, on Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Predictive Value of Minimal Residual Disease on Efficacy of Rituximab Maintenance

Eva Hoster, PhD, of Munich University, discusses results from the European MCL Elderly Trial, which confirmed the strong efficacy of rituximab maintenance in minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) after induction. Omitting maintenance based on MRD-negativity is thus discouraged. Considering the short time to progression, more effective treatment strategies should be explored in MRD-positive patients to improve long-term prognosis (Abstract 544).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement