Ursula A. Matulonis, MD, and Domenica Lorusso, MD, PhD, on Gynecologic Cancers: New Findings on Trabectedin vs Clinician’s Choice Chemotherapy

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting


Ursula A. Matulonis, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Domenica Lorusso, MD, PhD, of Italy’s Gemelli University Hospital, discuss phase III data from the MITO23 trial on single-agent trabectedin vs clinician’s choice of chemotherapy in patients with recurrent ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancers of BRCA-mutated or BRCAness phenotype. Although trabectedin has demonstrated antitumor activity in relapsed platinum-sensitive disease, it does not appear to improve survival outcomes when compared with standard chemotherapy in the BRCA-mutated population (Abstract LBA5504).


Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Ursula A. Matulonis: ... again, it is so great to see you. Domenica Lorusso: It's my great pleasure to be here. Ursula A. Matulonis: It really is just wonderful to see you here in Chicago. And congratulations on all of your trials that you are leading. I mean, you are a rockstar. Domenica Lorusso: Oh no, no, this is not, but I am so proud to be part... It's huge to be part of this particular moment of clinical research in gynecological malignancies. Ursula A. Matulonis: Yeah. Domenica Lorusso: We are lucky we are living an unprecedented moment for our tumors. Ursula A. Matulonis: I agree with you. So tell us about the MITO 23 study about the mechanism of action of Trabectedin, because we don't have that drug available in the United States for ovarian cancer and then kind of the rationale for the trial design. Domenica Lorusso: So we have Trabectedin in Europe, it has been approved in combination with the pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for the treatment of platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Trabectedin is a very interesting drug from my point of view, because it is a mineral DNA group binding, but also it's a several interaction with the micro environment, including some immunological action and anti antigenic action. So it's a complex drug. Preliminary data in clinical cell line of ovarian cancer, but also clinical data in sarcoma patient suggest the peculiar efficacy of Trabectedin in BRCA mutation because of the genes involved in HRR seems to play a particular role in the mechanism of action. And we are the preliminary phase two single agent trial meet of 15, which we have published in which we reported 40% of the role response rate in a population of 100 BRCA mute or BRCAness phenotype patient. And this constitute the rationale in our opinion, to test this drug against the standard of care in the same population, BRCA and BRCAness. The definition of BRCAness was clinical in the trial. So patients who have received and responded to at least two prior chemotherapy lines, platinum based. Ursula A. Matulonis: And the trial design, tell us about the trial design of really Trabectedin alone this time. So not combined with PLD yeah, versus standard treatment. Domenica Lorusso: Exactly. It is a randomized phase treat trial. It is an academic trial. So let you know, is becoming a difficult and difficult to perform academic trial now. And this is a academic trial completely sponsored by my hospital and we enrolled 244 patients. Trabectedin was a single agent, as you say was the experimental arm. And the control alarm was represented by physician choice chemotherapy between carboplatin, weekly paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, gemcitabine, and topotecan, so different option. Domenica Lorusso: The statistical hypothesis was to design a superiority trial. We want to demonstrate the superiority of Trabectedin in over standard for overall survival, which was the primary endpoint. And unfortunately we failed. Trabectedin did not report over survival benefit with respect to standard arm and did not report PFS benefit with respect to standard arm did not increase response rates. So all the endpoints primary and secondary were unfortunately negative. And I have to say in some exploratory analysis, we try to evaluate the benefit of Trabectedin with respect to platinum, or no platinum in the control arm. And also in this case, we did not report any superiority, but I have to say that the observation was 0.8 for carboplatin comparison and 0.8 now for non-platinum comparison. So Trabectedin is not superior to standard of care. No, no, no way. Ursula A. Matulonis: It's a really tough population. Yeah. To treat. Domenica Lorusso: Yeah. Well, we perform the forest plots analysis trying to address if there were some signals of heterogeneity of the efficacy in some of the subgroups BRCA mute or BRCAness type, the number of prior line of treatment platinum free interval, but we were not able to identify any population of benefit more than standard from Trabectedin. Ursula A. Matulonis: Gotcha. Based upon these results, how do you see the use of Trabectedin moving forward? Domenica Lorusso: Also, the trial is negative. There is no possibility to transform a negative superiority trial in a non-inferiority trial. This is my personal point of view, even though sometimes we see such conclusions. So Trabectedin is not superior, but if you simply look at the medium PFS, median OS, response rate in a so heavily treated population, because in our trial, 72% of patients have received at least three prior line of therapy. And 35% of them have already received PARP inhibitor. Domenica Lorusso: So this is even pretreated PARP and chemotherapy population. If you simply look at PFS, SOS, and response rate, there are, in my opinion, clear signals of activity of Trabectedin in single agent. What means for the clinician? We can use the drug in Europe only in combination with PLD. But PLD is moving earlier in the treatment algorithm because we combine it with platinum in patient who require platinum re treatment. So in this scenario when possible, I think that Trabectedin in single agent can be offered as an alternative option. Or in patient to start the combo. And you can stop PLD for any toxicity reason. The clinician can be confident that moving on with Trabectedin in single agent, they are offering an active drug to the patient. Ursula A. Matulonis: Yeah. I think this is a, even though it's, there are some negative results here. I think this is a really important trial. I mean, I think it's an important trial because it's an academic trial. And as you said, these are very hard to do. So congratulations. And I think there's really a lot to be learned here and that what you found is going to really help patients. Domenica Lorusso: I think we offer a great opportunity to our patient. I think that this drug would merit probably further exploration, but the most important thing also, I have to say it was the possibility to perform an academic trial in a lot of center who work for the pleasure of doing research. Because it was not supported the company provided the drug free of charge, but there were no compensation for patient treatment. And I think this trial represents a good opportunity because the academic can do high quality clinical research. Ursula A. Matulonis: Exactly. Thank you for being here today and congratulations on the results you presented and it's great to see you. Domenica Lorusso: My great pleasure as always. Thank you so much. Ursula A. Matulonis: You're welcome.

Related Videos


Jenny S. Guadamuz, PhD, on Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Telemedicine Use Among U.S. Patients With Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Jenny S. Guadamuz, PhD, of Flatiron Health, discusses the use of telemedicine services in community oncology clinics for patients initiating treatments for 21 common cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Black, uninsured, non-urban, and less affluent patients were less likely to use telemedicine services. Although telemedicine may expand access to specialty care, the proliferation of these services may widen cancer care disparities if equitable access to these services is not ensured, according to Dr. Guadamuz (Abstract 6511).


Eunice S. Wang, MD, on AML: Long-Term Results With Crenolanib Plus Chemotherapy

Eunice S. Wang, MD, of Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses long-term phase II findings of a trial evaluating crenolanib plus chemotherapy in newly diagnosed adults with FLT3-mutant acute myeloid leukemia. The study showed a composite complete remission rate of 86%. With a median follow-up of 45 months, median overall survival has not been reached. A phase III trial is ongoing (Abstract 7007).

Pancreatic Cancer

Alfredo Carrato, MD, PhD, on Pancreatic Cancer: Nab-Paclitaxel, Gemcitabine, and FOLFOX for Metastatic Disease

Alfredo Carrato, MD, PhD, of Alcala de Henares University in Spain, discusses phase II results from the SEQUENCE trial, which showed that nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and modified FOLFOX showed significantly higher clinical activity than the standard nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in the first-line setting of patients with untreated metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (Abstract 4022).

Bladder Cancer

Shilpa Gupta, MD, on Urothelial Cancer: Defining Who Is 'Platinum-Ineligible'

Shilpa Gupta, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, discusses an updated consensus definition for standard therapy and clinical trial eligibility for patients with metastatic urothelial cancer who are platinum-ineligible, criteria that are proposed to guide treatment recommendations for this population. This may be especially important now that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has restricted the use of first-line pembrolizumab to those who are considered platinum-ineligible (Abstract 4577).

Multiple Myeloma

Paul G. Richardson, MD, on Multiple Myeloma: New Data on Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone, With or Without ASCT

Paul G. Richardson, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses phase III findings from the DETERMINATION trial, which showed that, for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) with or without autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and lenalidomide maintenance to disease progression resulted in the longest median progression-free survival reported for each approach, and a highly significant difference in progression-free survival in favor of early transplant. While overall response rates were similar, rates of MRD favored early transplant also, but toxicity was greater and quality of life was transiently but significantly diminished. No overall survival advantage has been observed to date (Abstract LBA4).