Allison Betof Warner, MD, PhD, on TIL Therapy for Advanced Melanoma: Innovative Clinical Advances in Treatment
Thematic Newsreels
Allison Betof Warner, MD, PhD, reviews important clinical research in the treatment of advanced melanoma, including tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy, the role of this innovative treatment in advanced melanoma, and relevant data, peer-reviewed literature, and FDA approvals in 2024. She also provides a look ahead at what is on the horizon in 2025 with regard to care for patients with advanced melanoma.
Jennifer Gile, MD, of Willamette Valley Cancer Institute, reviews findings from the POLARIX study, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, international phase III trial that evaluated pola-R-CHP—a modified regimen of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP), in which vincristine was replaced with polatuzumab vedotin—as compared with standard R-CHOP, in patients with previously untreated intermediate-risk or high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). With a 5-year update from the trial being published recently, Dr. Gile discusses long-term results, the regimen’s performance in key high-risk subgroups, and how the study altered the front-line management of this disease.
Jennifer Gile, MD, of Willamette Valley Cancer Institute, talks about the first positive phase III trials in the high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) space—POLARIX and frontMIND. POLARIX established the superiority of a modified regimen of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) called pola-R-CHP, in which vincristine was replaced with polatuzumab vedotin, over standard R-CHOP; frontMIND showed that the addition of the CD19 monoclonal antibody tafasitamab plus the immunomodulatory drug lenalidomide to R-CHOP also improved outcomes over standard R-CHOP. Dr. Gile discusses current considerations when choosing between these regimens and how future research may lead to even more refined patient selection.
The ASCO Post Staff
Kent Shih, MD, of Tennessee Oncology, shares three patient cases that illustrate how gene-expression profiling (GEP) in patients with melanoma helps shape the decision to proceed to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and how often and thorough follow-up should be with medical oncology.
The ASCO Post Staff
Kent Shih, MD, of Tennessee Oncology, presents three patients cases that show how the use of gene-expression profile testing guides patient and practitioner decision-making when choosing the appropriate path of adjuvant treatment among individuals with melanoma.
Benjamin P. Levy, MD, of Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, reviews currently available therapies for patients with KRAS G12C–mutated non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), noting the importance of genomic testing to identify individuals eligible for treatment with these agents. He discusses the two FDA-approved second-line drugs in this space—sotorasib and adagrasib—touching on their efficacy and associated adverse events. He also mentions divarasib, an investigational next-generation KRAS G12C inhibitor, which showed superiority over both sotorasib and adagrasib in a recent head-to-head phase III trial.
