Allison Betof Warner, MD, PhD, on TIL Therapy for Advanced Melanoma: Innovative Clinical Advances in Treatment
Thematic Newsreels
Allison Betof Warner, MD, PhD, reviews important clinical research in the treatment of advanced melanoma, including tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy, the role of this innovative treatment in advanced melanoma, and relevant data, peer-reviewed literature, and FDA approvals in 2024. She also provides a look ahead at what is on the horizon in 2025 with regard to care for patients with advanced melanoma.
Jennifer Gile, MD, of Willamette Valley Cancer Institute, talks about the first positive phase III trials in the high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) space—POLARIX and frontMIND. POLARIX established the superiority of a modified regimen of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) called pola-R-CHP, in which vincristine was replaced with polatuzumab vedotin, over standard R-CHOP; frontMIND showed that the addition of the CD19 monoclonal antibody tafasitamab plus the immunomodulatory drug lenalidomide to R-CHOP also improved outcomes over standard R-CHOP. Dr. Gile discusses current considerations when choosing between these regimens and how future research may lead to even more refined patient selection.
The ASCO Post Staff
Kent Shih, MD, of Tennessee Oncology, presents three patients cases that show how the use of gene-expression profile testing guides patient and practitioner decision-making when choosing the appropriate path of adjuvant treatment among individuals with melanoma.
Jennifer Gile, MD, of Willamette Valley Cancer Institute, reviews findings from the POLARIX study, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, international phase III trial that evaluated pola-R-CHP—a modified regimen of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP), in which vincristine was replaced with polatuzumab vedotin—as compared with standard R-CHOP, in patients with previously untreated intermediate-risk or high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). With a 5-year update from the trial being published recently, Dr. Gile discusses long-term results, the regimen’s performance in key high-risk subgroups, and how the study altered the front-line management of this disease.
The ASCO Post Staff
Atish D. Choudhury, MD, PhD, a medical oncologist and clinical/translational investigator at the Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses current guideline recommendations for the use of relugolix and leuprolide, relugolix as a combination backbone, and important considerations when applying these data to clinical practice.
References
1. De La Cerda J, Dunshee C, Gervasi L, et al: A phase I clinical trial evaluating the safety and dosing of relugolix with novel hormonal therapy for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Target Oncol 3:383-390, 2023.
2. George DJ, Saad F, Cookson MS, et al: Impact of concomitant prostate cancer medications on efficacy and safety of relugolix versus leuprolide in men with advanced prostate cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 3:383-392, 2023.
3. Brown G, Belkoff L, Hafron JM, et al: Coadministration of apalutamide and relugolix in patients with localized prostate cancer at high risk for metastases. Target Oncol 1:95-103, 2023.
In hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, co-occurring ESR1 and PIK3CA mutations create therapeutic complexity. Oral SERDs, including elacestrant, retain activity despite PIK3CA co-mutation and may offer an efficacy–toxicity balance compared with PI3K/AKT pathway inhibitors. Treatment selection should incorporate molecular profile, anticipated efficacy, toxicity, and shared decision-making, states Neil M. Iyengar, MD.
