Advertisement


Christelle de la Fouchardiere, MD, on Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Phase III Trial Results With Gemcitabine Plus Paclitaxel

ESMO Congress 2022

Advertisement

Christelle de la Fouchardiere, MD, of France’s Centre Léon Bérard, discusses phase III findings from the PRODIGE 65–UCGI 36–GEMPAX UNICANCER study, which evaluated whether the combination of gemcitabine and paclitaxel improves overall survival compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after FOLFIRINOX failure or intolerance (Abstract LBA60).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The GEMPAX study is a phase III randomized trial comparing in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma second-line therapy with gemcitabine and paclitaxel versus gemcitabine alone. The primary endpoint of this study was overhaul survival. Patients included were having metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, they were having experienced disease progression of failure after FOLFIRINOX, and maintaining a good ECOG performance status. They were randomized with a 2:1 ratio between GEMPAX, the weekly combination of gemcitabine and paclitaxel, 3 weeks over 4 versus gemcitabine alone. They stopped treatment at disease progression or toxicity. There were four stratification factors, ECOG PS, CA19-9 at baseline, first-line PFS, and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio. The main results of this study is that we didn't observe any significant benefit in overall survival with the addition of paclitaxel to gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in this setting. But this is the first prospective phase III trial evaluating second-line therapy after FOLFIRINOX and we observe a good improvement of progression-free survival, a significant one, and also a significant increase in overall response rate, which is highly clinically relevant in this poor prognosis disease. Furthermore, we observed more treatment discontinuation in the GEMPAX arm and also imbalance in third-line therapies that could explain the absence of overall survival benefit. Then, we think that gemcitabine plus paclitaxel may be the standard second-line therapy after FOLFIRINOX failure or intolerance in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients. A substantial proportion of patients in this study received third-line therapies, reflecting the eye medical need, and also the requiring further clinical trials for this pathology.

Related Videos

Skin Cancer

Neil D. Gross, MD, on Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Recent Findings on Cemiplimab

Neil D. Gross, MD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses data from a phase II study, which showed that neoadjuvant cemiplimab-rwlc in patients with stage II–IV (M0) resectable cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma is active and may enable function-preserving surgery in some cases (Abstract 789O).

Breast Cancer
Genomics/Genetics

Antonio Marra, MD, on Metastatic Breast Cancer: Patterns of Genomic Instability and Their Effect on Treatment

Antonio Marra, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, discusses a mutational signature analysis that reveals patterns of genomic instability linked to resistance to endocrine therapy with or without CDK4/6 inhibition in patients with estrogen receptor–positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (Abstract 210O).

Lung Cancer

Charles Swanton, PhD, on Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Induced by Air Pollution

Charles Swanton, PhD, of The Francis Crick Institute, discusses a newly discovered mechanism of action for air pollution–induced non–small cell lung cancer in which particles linked to climate change appear to promote cancerous changes. The finding might pave the way for new potential approaches to lung cancer prevention and treatment (Abstract LBA1).

Kidney Cancer
Immunotherapy

Robert J. Motzer, MD, on Renal Cell Carcinoma: New Results With Nivolumab and Ipilimumab

Robert J. Motzer, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, discusses phase III results of the CheckMate 914 trial, which explored the efficacy of adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs placebo in the treatment of patients with localized renal cell carcinoma who are at high risk of relapse after nephrectomy (Abstract LBA4).

Skin Cancer

John B.A.G. Haanen, MD, PhD, on Melanoma: Phase III Data on Treatment With Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes vs Ipilimumab

John B.A.G. Haanen, MD, PhD, of The Netherlands Cancer Institute, discusses recent phase III findings, which show that tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) improve progression-free survival compared with ipilimumab by 50% in patients with advanced melanoma after not responding to anti–PD-1 treatment. Around 50% of TIL-treated patients had a response, and 20% had a complete response (Abstract LBA3).

Advertisement

Advertisement



Advertisement