Alicia Latham, MD, MS, on Using ctDNA to Detect Endometrial Cancer
2025 ASCO Annual Meeting
Alicia Latham, MD, MS, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, discusses the feasibility of using Pap-derived ctDNA for the detection of sporadic and Lynch syndrome–associated endometrial cancer (Abstract 10503).
Transcript
Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The study is important because for the longest time women's only option if they had an increased risk for gynecologic cancer because of hereditary predisposition like BRCA or Lynch syndrome or some of these other hereditary susceptibilities was they were recommended to and still are recommended to undergo risk-reducing hysterectomy. So it's a major quality of life issue. Right now, the only possible screening option for women with Lynch syndrome for uterine cancer is endometrial biopsy. The NCCN recommends that women can consider this. But unfortunately we know that they don't really work very well in terms of detecting uterine cancer as a pure screening test. And they're also very invasive and uncomfortable and cause a lot of pain. The idea behind the study is to try to develop a new way to screen for uterine cancer by using cell-free DNA, which we all know as more of a blood-based test, but in actuality, you can extract cell-free DNA from multiple body fluids. And so what the study has done is we looked at 16 patients with known uterine cancer that were going in for surgical operation, collected both a blood test and a cervical sample and extracted cell-free DNA from both body fluids. And then we compared tumor mutations, we sequenced them, compared tumor mutations in the actual tumor cancers to those that were found in the blood and those that were found in the cervical mucus sampling. And we found in what we're calling Pap ctDNA that over 90% of our mutations were detected in these early-stage cancers. In fact, it was 93% in FIGO grade 1 uterine cancer. In comparison, the blood test only detected about one-quarter of these. So we have a lot of work to do. This is a small feasibility study. We're in the process of expanding this more. I'm working on looking at other tumor types such as ovarian, which I've already been asked about, and hopefully we’ll be able to have an option for women for screening for these cancers for which they have not had effective screening.
The ASCO Post Staff
Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, FASCO, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, discusses findings from the phase III ASCENT-04/KEYNOTE-D19 study, which compared sacituzumab govitecan-hziy plus pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab in previously untreated patients with PD-L1–positive advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (LBA109).
The ASCO Post Staff
Jamie E. Chaft, MD, FASCO, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, reviews results of the NeoADAURA trial, which looked at neoadjuvant osimertinib with or without chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone in patients with resectable EGFR-mutated non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (Abstract 8001).
The ASCO Post Staff
Karen Eubanks Jackson, Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Sisters Network Inc. and recipient of the 2025 ASCO Patient Advocate Award, discusses her 30-year-long effort to support patients with breast cancer in the Black community. Sisters Network is focused on raising awareness of early screening for breast cancer, providing financial assistance, and addressing the disparities Black women face in breast cancer care and outcomes.
The ASCO Post Staff
Erika Hamilton, MD, Director, Breast Cancer Research at Sarah Cannon Research Institute, reviews data from the global, randomized, phase III VERITAC-2 study, which compared vepdegestrant, an oral PROTAC (PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera) estrogen receptor degrader, to fulvestrant among patients with ER-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Vepdegestrant is the first PROTAC to be evaluated in a phase III trial (Abstract LBA1000).
The ASCO Post Staff
William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses two abstracts on lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) in relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). In Abstract 7037, liso-cel with ibrutinib demonstrated better efficacy and safety compared with liso-cel monotherapy, with statistically significant differences for complete response rate and overall response rate. In Abstract 7039, patients with R/R CLL/SLL who had received two or more prior lines of therapy had improved response, delayed progression, and prolonged survival with liso-cel compared with a real-world cohort treated with standard-of-care therapy.