Advertisement


Alicia Latham, MD, MS, on Using ctDNA to Detect Endometrial Cancer

2025 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Alicia Latham, MD, MS, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, discusses the feasibility of using Pap-derived ctDNA for the detection of sporadic and Lynch syndrome–associated endometrial cancer (Abstract 10503). 



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The study is important because for the longest time women's only option if they had an increased risk for gynecologic cancer because of hereditary predisposition like BRCA or Lynch syndrome or some of these other hereditary susceptibilities was they were recommended to and still are recommended to undergo risk-reducing hysterectomy. So it's a major quality of life issue. Right now, the only possible screening option for women with Lynch syndrome for uterine cancer is endometrial biopsy. The NCCN recommends that women can consider this. But unfortunately we know that they don't really work very well in terms of detecting uterine cancer as a pure screening test. And they're also very invasive and uncomfortable and cause a lot of pain. The idea behind the study is to try to develop a new way to screen for uterine cancer by using cell-free DNA, which we all know as more of a blood-based test, but in actuality, you can extract cell-free DNA from multiple body fluids. And so what the study has done is we looked at 16 patients with known uterine cancer that were going in for surgical operation, collected both a blood test and a cervical sample and extracted cell-free DNA from both body fluids. And then we compared tumor mutations, we sequenced them, compared tumor mutations in the actual tumor cancers to those that were found in the blood and those that were found in the cervical mucus sampling. And we found in what we're calling Pap ctDNA that over 90% of our mutations were detected in these early-stage cancers. In fact, it was 93% in FIGO grade 1 uterine cancer. In comparison, the blood test only detected about one-quarter of these. So we have a lot of work to do. This is a small feasibility study. We're in the process of expanding this more. I'm working on looking at other tumor types such as ovarian, which I've already been asked about, and hopefully we’ll be able to have an option for women for screening for these cancers for which they have not had effective screening.

Related Videos

Colorectal Cancer

Christopher M. Booth, MD, on a Structured Exercise Program for Patients With Colon Cancer

Christopher M. Booth, MD, of Queen’s University, reviews findings from the randomized phase III Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG) CO.21 (CHALLENGE) trial, which evaluated the impact of a structured exercise program on disease-free survival in patients with stage III or high-risk stage II colon cancer (Abstract LBA3510). 

Lung Cancer

David R. Spigel, MD, FASCO, on NSCLC Treatment Planning: Role of 14-Gene Molecular Assay

David R. Spigel, MD, FASCO, Chief Scientific Officer of Sarah Cannon Research Institute, reviews data on the role of a 14-gene molecular assay in selecting patients with stage IA–IIA non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as high risk (LBA8027). 

Lung Cancer

Bjorn Henning Gronberg, MD, PhD, on SCLC: Adjuvant Immunotherapy After CRT

Bjorn Henning Gronberg, MD, PhD, of Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) and St. Olavs Hospital, presents phase II findings on the efficacy of atezolizumab after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (LBA8005).  

Lung Cancer

Jamie E. Chaft, MD, FASCO, on Resectable EGFR-Mutated NSCLC: NeoADAURA Results

Jamie E. Chaft, MD, FASCO, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, reviews results of the NeoADAURA trial, which looked at neoadjuvant osimertinib with or without chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone in patients with resectable EGFR-mutated non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (Abstract 8001). 

Breast Cancer

Erika Hamilton, MD, on ER-Positive HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Vepdegestrant vs Fulvestrant

Erika Hamilton, MD, Director, Breast Cancer Research at Sarah Cannon Research Institute, reviews data from the global, randomized, phase III VERITAC-2 study, which compared vepdegestrant, an oral PROTAC (PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera) estrogen receptor degrader, to fulvestrant among patients with ER-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Vepdegestrant is the first PROTAC to be evaluated in a phase III trial (Abstract LBA1000). 

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement