Advertisement


Nicholas C. Turner, MD, PhD, on INAVO120: Final Overall Survival Analysis

2025 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Nicholas C. Turner, MD, PhD, of the Royal Marsden Hospital, presents final overall survival data from the INAVO120 trial of inavolisib/placebo plus palbociclib and fulvestrant in patients with PIK3CA-mutated, HR-positive, HER2-negative, endocrine-resistant advanced breast cancer (Abstract 1003).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Here at ASCO, we're presenting the overall survival results of the ANAVO-120 trial. This is a trial for patients with metastatic hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer that has got PIK3CA mutations and specifically for patients that are relapsing on endocrine therapy. We know that this is an aggressive type of breast cancer and we're very much in need of new therapies. And so the ANAVO-120 trial randomized these patients in the first-line setting to the standard of care, which was fulvestrant and palbociclib, or the addition of the PI3 kinase inhibitor inavolisib in the triplet. Inavolisib is a novel PI3 kinase inhibitor. It inhibits PIK3CA alpha, but also it degrades the alpha mutant protein and that probably improves the therapeutic window with inavolisib compared to other PI3 kinase inhibitors. And very importantly, inavolisib is combinable with fulvestrant and palbociclib at the maximum single agent doses. And so what we're doing in that triple combination is we're targeting the estrogen receptor, CDK4/6, and the PI3 kinase inhibitor. And by targeting all of these three key aspects of this type of breast cancer, we're really starting to get really significant efficacy. So in the primary readout of ANAVO-120, we demonstrated that adding in inavolisib substantially improved progression-free survival. And now with longer follow-up, we're also demonstrating that adding in inavolisib improved overall survival with a hazard ratio of 0.67, passing the statistical significance barrier. So that's improving overall survival by 33% on average. A median improvement is 7 months. But we also can look at some other really important endpoints in the study, in particular time to first use of chemotherapy. I mean, this is an endpoint that is very important for people, and the addition of inavolisib delayed the time to chemotherapy on average by almost two years. Now why are we seeing such a big improvement in the study? Partly it's that first-line efficacy substantially improving PFS by over half, as well as a substantial improvement in the response rate. And that of course carries through to delaying time to chemotherapy, but also because we're seeing such a reduction in tumor burden with the triplet that also enabled people in the second line to avoid chemotherapy more often. And it's all translated through to that almost doubling in time to chemotherapy. So this is potentially a really important new treatment option for these patients who've relapsed on endocrine therapy with PIK3CA mutant breast cancer.

Related Videos

Prostate Cancer

Nicholas D. James, PhD, FRCP, MBBS, on Using AI to Identify Benefit From Prostate Cancer Therapy

Nicholas D. James, PhD, FRCP, MBBS, of The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, describes the use of a multimodal artificial intelligence (AI) model to identify benefit from second-generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitors in patients with high-risk nonmetastatic prostate cancer participating in the STAMPEDE trial (Abstract 5001). 

 

Pancreatic Cancer

Sameek Roychowdhury, MD, PhD, on Telemedicine in Clinical Trials

Sameek Roychowdhury, MD, PhD, of the Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, discusses a recently opened telemedicine clinical trial of pemigatinib in patients with advanced or metastatic FGFR-mutated pancreatic cancer, and the germination of a new initiative, TNT Cancer, which focuses on leveraging telemedicine to bring trials nationwide.

Colorectal Cancer

Heinz-Josef Lenz, MD, on MSI-H/dMMR Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Expanded Analyses From CheckMate 8HW

Heinz-Josef Lenz, MD, of the University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, reviews analyses from the CheckMate 8HW trial, which evaluated nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs chemotherapy or nivolumab monotherapy for microsatellite instability–high/mismatch repair–deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (Abstract 3501). 

Lung Cancer

Raffaele Califano, MD, on EGFR-Mutant Advanced NSCLC: MARIPOSA-2

Raffaele Califano, MD, of the Christie NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Manchester, discusses outcomes by osimertinib resistance mechanisms in MARIPOSA-2, a study that evaluated the efficacy of the bispecific antibody amivantamab-vmjw plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC after disease progression on osimertinib (Abstract 8639). 

Lung Cancer

Luis G. Paz-Ares, MD, PhD, on Extensive-Stage SCLC: Comparison of First-Line Regimens

Luis G. Paz-Ares, MD, PhD, of Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, H12O-CNIO Lung Cancer Unit, Universidad Complutense and Ciberonc, discusses data from the TIGOS trial, a phase III study comparing the first-line use of atigotatug (an antifucosyl-GM1 monoclonal antibody) plus nivolumab fixed-dose combination with chemotherapy vs atezolizumab with chemotherapy in patients with  extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (Abstract TPS8127).

 

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement