Advertisement


Yucai Wang, MD, PhD, on Richter Transformation of CLL: Findings on Combination Therapy With an Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Yucai Wang, MD, PhD, of the Mayo Clinic, discusses the increased efficacy of combination therapy with pembrolizumab plus a BCR kinase inhibitor compared with pembrolizumab alone in patients with Richter transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL; Abstract 7050).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
So, Richter's transformation is a rare but devastating complication of chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma. The prognosis of this disease is poor without established standard of care treatments. Our institution did a phase two clinical trial investigating the efficacy of pembrolizumab in this disease. Previously, we have reported preliminary efficacy results of this trial. So in the first nine patients with Richter's transformation, we observed a response rate of 44%. In this updated analysis, we report updated efficacy data of single-agent pembrolizumab and the combination therapy with pembrolizumab and a BCR inhibitor. So in this trial, patients were first treated with single-agent pembrolizumab every three weeks for up to 12 months. Patients who only have stable disease after three cycles of treatment or those who progress at any time during this single-agent treatment phase can add a inhibitor of the B-cell receptor, either with a BTK inhibitor or a PI3K inhibitor. So in this updated analysis, we enrolled a total of 26 patients, nine in the initial cohort, as reported a number of years earlier, and 17 in an expansion cohort. Looking at the patient and the disease baseline characteristics, this is consistent with what you would observe in this patient population. To highlight, most of the patients had unmutated IgHV and about 40% of the patients had TP53 alterations. This is a heavily pretreated population with a median of three lines of prior therapy, with up to 11 lines of therapy for CIL and five lines of therapy for Richter's transformation. Over half of the patients were previously exposed to BTK inhibitor ibrutinib already, and the massive majority of those patients actually had disease progression on this agent. So again, a high-risk patient population, difficult to treat. So in this trial, we observed that with single-agent pembrolizumab treatment, the objective response rate was 23%, or six out of 26 responses. It was two CR and 4 PRs. What's interesting is that for the 16 patients who went on to receive a doublet therapy with pembrolizumab either in combination with ibrutinib or idelalisib, we saw a high response rate of over 60%. So again, these are patients who progressed through pembrolizumab, and most of the patients have been previously exposed to ibrutinib, so this 60% response rate is very encouraging. In terms of survival outcomes, in a single-agent phase they observed the median progression-free survival was three months, and the median progression-free survival in the doublet therapy phase was about eight months. In total, the median overall survival is about one year, and the overall survival rate at two years is 27%. So again, in this heavily pretreated population with high-risk disease features, this doublet therapy certainly looks very encouraging in inducing a response and to maintain that. So these data do suggest that a PD-L1 blockade in combination with a BCR inhibitor is efficacious in treating Richter's transformation and it warrants further exploration. We do have another ongoing trial examining the combination of PD-L1 blockade in combination with a BTK inhibitor and the venetoclax in this patient population, and we look forward to sharing those results in the future.

Related Videos

Issues in Oncology

Andrew Srisuwananukorn, MD, and Alexander T. Pearson, MD, PhD, on Artificial Intelligence in the Clinic: Understanding How to Use This 21st Century Tool

Andrew Srisuwananukorn, MD, of The Ohio State University, and Alexander T. Pearson, MD, PhD, of the University of Chicago, discuss the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the clinic, its potential benefits in diagnosis and treatment, resources available to help physicians learn more about AI, and what’s coming for the next generation of medical school students.

Breast Cancer

Eva M. Ciruelos, MD, PhD, on HER2-Positive and PAM50 Luminal Breast Cancer: Primary Results From the PATRICIA Trial

Eva M. Ciruelos, MD, PhD, of Spain’s Hospital 12 de Octubre and the Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre, discusses phase II data showing that the combination of palbociclib, trastuzumab, and endocrine therapy improved progression-free survival in patients with previously treated PAM50 luminal A or B, HER2-positive advanced breast cancer, as compared with treatment of physicians’ choice (Abstract 1008).

Lung Cancer

Tomasz Jankowski, MD, PhD, on Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: New Data on a Telomere-Targeting Agent

Tomasz Jankowski, MD, PhD, of Poland’s Medical University in Lublin, discusses a phase II study of THIO, a telomere-targeting agent followed by cemiplimab-rwlc for a difficult-to-treat population of patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (Abstract 8601).

Skin Cancer

Christian U. Blank, MD, PhD, on Melanoma: Potentially Practice-Changing Results From the NADINA Trial

Christian U. Blank, MD, PhD, of the Netherlands Cancer Institute, discusses findings of an investigator-initiated phase III trial showing that neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab followed by response-driven adjuvant treatment improved event-free survival in patients with macroscopic, resectable stage III melanoma compared with adjuvant nivolumab (LBA2)

Prostate Cancer
Genomics/Genetics

Alicia Morgans, MD, MPH, and Susan Halabi, PhD, on Prostate Cancer: New Findings on Classifying Patients Into Risk Groups

Alicia Morgans, MD, MPH, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Susan Halabi, PhD, of the Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University School of Medicine, discuss a clinical-genetic model that identified novel circulating tumor DNA alterations that are prognostic of overall survival and may help to classify patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer into risk groups useful for selecting trial participants (Abstract 5007).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement