Advertisement


Yasmin H. Karimi, MD, on Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Follow-up on Subcutaneous Epcoritamab Monotherapy

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Yasmin H. Karimi, MD, of the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses 2.5-year follow-up data on epcoritamab monotherapy for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma. The subcutaneous regimen continues to demonstrate durable responses (Abstract 7039).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
EPCORE NHL-1 was a phase 2 trial evaluating Epcoritamab, a CD20, CD3-bispecific antibody in the treatment of relapsed refractory large cell lymphoma in the second line and beyond setting. In this poster, we presented longer term follow-up results, MRD results, as well as results from the optimization cohort. In the study, patients with relapsed refractory disease were enrolled and treated with Epcoritamab step-up dosing with full dose given on cycle 1, day 15. In the optimization cohort, the dosing schema remained the same. However, CRS prophylaxis was 15 milligrams, dexamethasone, and 500 milliliters of hydration. In the optimization cohort, hospitalization for CRS monitoring after full dose treatment was not required. 157 patients with large B-cell lymphoma were treated in the expansion cohort. The median age was 68 years, and patients had a median of three prior lines of treatment. This was a heavily pretreated patient population with 39% of patients having received a prior CAR-T and 83% refractory to the last line of treatment. The overall response rate in the study was 59% with 41% experiencing a complete response. A median follow-up time of 31 months. The median duration of CR has not yet been reached. An estimated 54% of complete responders remained in CR at 30 months. In patients in complete response, 80% of patients achieved MRD negativity at cycle 3 and 92% of patients experienced MRD negativity at any time point as assessed by clonoSEQ MRD. The most common treatment emergent adverse events were cytokine release syndrome, occurring at 51% of patients, fatigue, fever, neutropenia, diarrhea, nausea, anemia, and infections. There were 29% of patients that had a grade three or higher serious infection, and 10% discontinued therapy due to infection. As this trial was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic and the omicron variant, there were 32 cases of COVID and nine deaths due to COVID. In the optimization cohort, the uniform use of dexamethasone and hydration, the incidents and severity of CRS occurred in about 37% of patients, and with the majority being low grade. Most CRS occurred after the first full dose of treatment and CRS events all resolved. Hospitalization was not mandatory and was at the discretion of the investigator. 60% of patients received outpatient therapy and only one patient required subsequent inpatient admission. After outpatient treatment, the remaining CRS events were managed without hospitalization. In summary, with over 2.5 years of follow-up of single agent Epcoritamab in relapse refractory large cell lymphoma, including high risk patient populations with prior CAR-T and primary refractory disease, the data continues to show ongoing durable responses in patients who achieve a CR and 62% of patients remain in CR at two years. In the optimization cohort data, in addition to another abstract printed in ash with outpatient Epcoritamab lends support to the safety of fully outpatient administration.

Related Videos

Breast Cancer

Sherene Loi, MD, PhD, on Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Weighing the Prognostic Value of ctDNA Detection

Sherene Loi, MD, PhD, of Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, discusses a circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis from a cohort of patients with early-stage breast cancer who were enrolled in the monarchE trial. This large cohort was studied to look at the usefulness of a personalized tumor-informed assay for ctDNA detection in early stage high-risk patients (LBA507).

Bladder Cancer

Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, on Urothelial Carcinoma: The DESTINY-Pan Tumor02 Study and New Findings on Sacituzumab Govitecan

Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, of Barts Cancer Institute and the University of London, and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, discuss clinical outcomes of sacituzumab govitecan-hziy after prior exposure to enfortumab vedotin-ejfv in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma, as well as the safety and efficacy of fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki in patients with HER2-expressing bladder tumors (Abstracts 4502 and 4509).

Lymphoma

David J. Andorsky, MD, on DLBCL and FL: New Data on Use of Subcutaneous Epcoritamab

David J. Andorsky, MD, of the Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, discusses EPCORE NHL-6, an ongoing study of patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL). As outpatients, the study participants were given subcutaneous epcoritamab-bysp to see whether they could be safely monitored and cytokine-release syndrome appropriately managed in the outpatient setting (Abstract 7029).

Skin Cancer

Axel Hauschild, MD, on Melanoma: Findings From the PIVOTAL Trial of Daromun vs Surgery

Axel Hauschild, MD, of Germany’s University of Kiel and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, discusses phase III study results on neoadjuvant intralesional daromun vs immediate surgery for patients with fully resectable, locally advanced melanoma (Abstract LBA9501).

Bladder Cancer

Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, and Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, on Urothelial Carcinoma: Expert Commentary on Two Key Abstracts

Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, of Barts Cancer Institute and the University of London, discuss phase III findings from two studies: the first, investigating enfortumab vedotin-ejfv and pembrolizumab vs platinum-based chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer; and the second, looking at nivolumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin vs gemcitabine and cisplatin alone in patients with lymph node–only metastatic disease enrolled in the CheckMate 901 trial (Abstracts 4581 and 4565).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement