Advertisement


Thierry Facon, MD, on Multiple Myeloma: Results From the IMROZ Study on Isatuximab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Thierry Facon, MD, of the University of Lille and Lille University Hospital, discusses phase III findings showing for the first time that isatuximab, an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, when given with the standard of care (bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone, or VRd) to patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are transplant-ineligible, may reduce the risk of disease progression or death by 40.4% vs VRd alone (Abstract 7500).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The purpose of the study was to assess the clinical benefit of adding isatuximab, which is an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody to bortezomib lendalidomide and dexamethasone referred as the VRd regimen. So this study is the first study combining a CD38 monoclonal antibody to the VRd platform. And this study is conducted in transplant-ineligible patient with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Importantly, the VRd regimen is a very well-established standard of care for the elderly and also for transplant-eligible patients. And also importantly, these elderly patients have still an unmet medical need, and it's extremely important for this particular patient to have a very strong and effective first-line therapy. So the study was conducted as a phase III international study in 21 countries, and we enrolled 446 patients randomly allocated to either Isa-VRd, or VRd, followed by Isa-Rd, or Rd alone. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. So the study met its primary endpoint of PFS with a very strong benefit in favor of the isatuximab arm. The median PFS was not reached for the Isa-VRd arm and was 54 months for the VRd arm. The five-year PFS rate was 45% for VRd versus 63% for Isa-VRd. The hazard ratio was 0.596. So this was both statistically and clinically a very significant difference. Besides this PFS benefit, we had also an important benefit in terms of response, including high quality responses. The complete response rate was 64% for VRd versus 75% for Isa-VRd. We assessed minimal residual disease. So MRD and MRD negativity was seen in MRD, negative CR was seen in 55% of the Isa-VRd patients versus 41% of the VRd patients. Sustained MRD negativity for more than one year was almost double in the Isa-VRd arm from 24% to 47%. In terms of safety, this regimen was well-tolerated. The safety profile was in line with the safety profiles of each agent, and these agents are known for many years. So we did not see any new safety signal, and the safety of this regimen was considered to be good for this elderly patient. Also, considering that we did exclude patients over the age of 80 years. The conclusion is just to say that this Isa-VRd regimen will become likely a new standard of care for transplant-ineligible patients below the age of 80 years. So this is an important result based on a very strong efficacy and an adequate safety profile.

Related Videos

Leukemia
Immunotherapy

Allison M. Winter, MD, on Richter Transformation: New Data on a CAR T-Cell Treatment

Allison M. Winter, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, discusses real-world outcomes with lisocabtagene maraleucel in patients with Richter transformation, a difficult-to-treat population with a poor prognosis. Data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research showed this therapy provided clinical benefit with a high complete response rate (Abstract 7010).

Breast Cancer

Ana C. Garrido-Castro, MD, on Managing Metastatic Breast Cancer in 2024

Ana C. Garrido-Castro, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses recent approvals of multiple novel therapies for metastatic breast cancer, weighing their potential benefits and risks, understanding the mechanisms that drive response and resistance, and exploring how to optimally sequence them to enhance survival and quality of life.

Colorectal Cancer

Jeanne Tie, MD, MBChB, on Colon Cancer: New Data on ctDNA Guiding Adjuvant Therapy

Jeanne Tie, MD, MBChB, of Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, discusses data on survival and updated 5-year results from the DYNAMIC trial, which supports a role for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis, including serial sampling, in the management of patients with stage II colon cancer (Abstract 108).

Leukemia
Lymphoma

William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, on CLL/SLL: Updated Findings on Ibrutinib and Venetoclax

William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses up to 5.5 years of follow-up data from the phase II CAPTIVATE study, showing that in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), fixed duration ibrutinib plus venetoclax continues to provide clinically meaningful progression-free disease in those with high-risk genomic features as well as in the overall population (Abstract 7009).

Lung Cancer

Tony S.K. Mok, MD, on NSCLC: Adagrasib vs Docetaxel in KRAS G12C–Mutated Disease

Tony S.K. Mok, MD, of The Chinese University of Hong Kong, discusses phase III findings from the KRYSTAL-12 study, which showed that adagrasib improved progression-free survival and overall response rate over docetaxel in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer harboring a KRAS G12C mutation who had previously received a platinum-based chemotherapy with anti–PD-(L)1 treatment.

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement